Archive for October, 2010


So you state that President Obama is depressed?  How did you come by this information?  From a direct source still working within the White House on a daily basis.  As I had stated previously, tensions at the White House have reached a critical stage.  The infighting among staff is off the charts.  More recently, the president has increasingly withdrawn emotionally from the day to day demands of his job – he has become what was described to me as “empty”.

Empty?  That is correct – empty.

Do you mean to say the president is not doing his job?  Not exactly.  He is there, he is getting briefed throughout the day, but President Obama appears to have emotionally shut down, not entirely mind you, but a great deal. It has worsened since I was last there.  His natural detachment has become almost chronic to the point of being disconcerting to staff around him.  It appears President Obama is suffering from severe depression.

You’re not a doctor, how are you qualified to make such a charge?  No, I’m not a doctor, but from all the reports coming back to me, and from what I did see with my own eyes prior to leaving the White House myself, I think it is a very reasonable assumption to make.  President Obama is emotionally shutting down.  He is a terribly depressed man.

And why do you think this is happening?  Well for one, he was completely unprepared for the job of being President of the United States.  The demands on one’s time, the emotional and physical toll, are considerable.  Second, the failure of the administration to effectively communicate to the American people.  You have to understand that Obama believed that his ability to orate would be enough – that is proving to have been a considerable mistake on Obama’s part, and he is not dealing particularly well with that reality.

But you are no longer at the White House, correct?  That is correct.

So why then should your opinion on the condition of President Obama be viewed as legitimate?  I certainly understand a healthy dose of scepticism.  I still wish to remain anonymous, and for those still supporting the president, I would understand how they would wish to dismiss any reports that diminish President Obama in any way.  The fact remains though, I know what I know.  And I know what I have been told by very reliable sources still at the White House.  There are staff increasingly dissatisfied with this president. When that happens, word starts to get out.

But still…(interrupting) I would also add what you well know.  I have been quite accurate on my previous discussions with you. I indicated there would be a mass exodus of staff from the White House days and even weeks prior to those leaving became public.  Larry, David, Rahm, and more have or are in the process of leaving.  Your readers need only check the dates of when you published with the public announcements of those departures to confirm that fact.  I have been very truthful.  I indicated Pelosi was under intense pressure and challenge from within her own party.  That has also proven to be accurate.  What I have told you to date has been the very thing that has developed surrounding the White House – and what I am telling you now is also just as accurate.

But why share it with me and not others?  (smiles) Well, for one, we know each other, correct?  There is that.  You do your little blogging ventures, both great and small, and I do my thing.  Second, I am using you just as much as you are using me.  Let’s not pretend that is not the case.  If someone who could do me harm professionally for having shared this information with you attempts to do so, I have a certain degree of deniability based on your own near inconsequential standing – no disrespect intended.  I would also add that you are not the only one I am talking to.  Lastly, call this process a test balloon, the kind that is often run up in politics. We are gauging the reaction by those within the party, as well as critical supporters outside the party.  In essence – can we count on Obama for 2012?  We are conceding November 2010.  We are about to get our asses kicked. Ok, so be it – let’s get our –expletive- together for 2012.  The most critical component of that of course, is Barack Obama.  Will he hold up?  Can he prove as effective a candidate for 2012 as he was in 2008?

But you indicated before you did not think another four years of an Obama administration would be good for the country.  And now you are saying he is suffering from depression.  Why would the Democratic Party want to run Obama again in 2012?  Well for one, he’s the sitting president.  To attempt to not have him as our nominee would be a significant disruption to the party, a disruption that may prove difficult to recover from in the near-term.  Second, I stated that another four years, if they were like these first two years, would not be good for the country. I still believe that, but also I am still hopeful the president can realize his potential, reinvigorate himself to the job, and become the president I and others still believe he can in fact be.

So just how bad is the president’s depression?  It is my understanding it is pretty bad.

Is he being treated?  You will need to be more specific, do you mean by a doctor?

Yes.  Well of course

he is being treated.  He’s the President of the United States.

What I mean specifically is medication.  Is the president receiving medication for his depression?  (Long pause)  I believe…yes, I believe he is.  I believe he has been for some time actually.  As to something more specific, I do not know.  Nor do I care to say.


Just to confirm then – it is your belief that President Obama is on anti-depression medication Yes – that is what I just told you.


And you are ok with my printing that?  Yeah, or I wouldn’t have told you.  I see no shame in being treated for such a condition.  I think it much better someone dealing with that kind of thing by getting proper treatment.  It’s far better than the damn smoking.

Smoking? The president is still smoking then?  Yeah – I thought that was pretty common knowledge. Yeah, the president is still smoking.  The problem is, he’s apparently smoking a great deal, and for a man approaching his 50th year, having smoked for so long, that cannot be a good thing.  I’ll put it this way – the smoking is considerable enough that it has become an issue.

An issue?  Who has the issue specifically?  I would assume his family.  I know the White House – his staff. Certainly his doctors.  They have noted the increase in his smoking over the last year.  It has apparently alarmed some of them considerably.

So what are we talking about here? More than a pack a day?  Oh yeah, more than that. The guy is under a lot of stress, that is no secret.  I smoked for a long time myself.  It is a very tough thing to quit successfully, so I certainly know about the struggle to try and do so.

So how would you describe the overall mood of the White House these days?  Troubled. Concerned.  Uncertain.  And angry.  A lot of anger.

And what about the mood of the president himself?  The same.

You have been kind enough to leave our readers with a tidbit of information to further prove the validity of your claims.  What can you leave us with this time regarding what is coming from the White House or the Democratic Party that has not yet been picked up by the mainstream media?


Just prior to the midterm elections, a significant figure within the party is going to break out and talk publicly to the media about much of what has and is going on both at the White House and Congress.  We need to have a bit of a cleansing process as a party, and this individual is now willing to do just that. It may actually be more than one. From there we can start the process of rebuilding and recovery. It will be much the same as we did back in 1994. That playbook is still as legitimate today as it was then.  Don’t count out the Democratic Party – we will be back, and back in a big way, and I still believe back in time for 2012.




Read more:

Obama Begins Cashing in On Carbon Credits in KENYA

The new world currency apparently will be tied to “carbon credits” as the standard of value.   Never mind that global warming (aka CLIMATE-GATE) is a massive hoax and fraud.  Rather than issue worthless fiat paper money, why not issue ‘carbon credits’ on a global scale.  Keep in mind that any and all brokered “credits” generate massive fees for Goldman Sachs, Al Gore, and Barack and Michelle Obama – via their “Chicago Carbon Exchange.”  Of course, Obama’s birth country of Kenya is leading the way!!