Archive for July, 2011


Who’s Who In the Zoo – By Dr. Truess (Rhymes with Seuss)

Who’s Who in the Zoo?  
By Dr. Truess (rhymes with Suess).

Who’s who in the “patriot” zoo?  It’s so full of worms and primordial goo – MY – what can one do?
Watch your step, cause there’s lots of bad pooh – smelly stuff that will stick on your shoe!

There’s Turner, and Jones, and SO MANY who blow —
So hard on their horns, that their brains are WAY slow.

There’s Noory and Bell, Pallin and Beck —
Shooting the Tea Party all to Heck —

They’ll pitch you their wares – donate big to the cause —
They’ll be the ones to protect ALL our laws.

They’ll tell you SOME truth, but in prescribed doses –
As they shield and protect truly villainous noses —

It’s this, and its that, but take THIS to heart –
That they’ll never expose the ZIONISTS’ PART.

And those who DARE do so, those like Ott, Alma True?
They’ll be quickly attacked by the ADL Crew!!!

They’ll first challenge credentials; then by hook or by crook –
Shout lies to the world:  “he’s a CIA Spook!!!!”

Then they’ll be publicly denounced as criminally insane —
by our “specialty agents,”  — Horowitz and Kane!

Under the Banner of “Holocaust” Shame —
We can quickly deflect any “provocateur” Blame —

Cause we’re “God’s Chosen Bloodline” – it’s all in our Name —
(But our God is “Molech” and WE fan his flame!)

While thousands of Children are ritually killed –
Our “Sacred” fire consumes all trace of blood spilled.

For we seek first the Kingdom of Baal and the Beast –
The New (Old) World Order of Babylonian Feast!

It’s all about SEX MAGIC, not your typical CRUD —
All there in the pages of our Holy TALMUD!

Stubblebine and Rima – the stooge and the witch –
know firsthand and well the slime in this ditch.

Bert’s Earth First Battalion is yet Staring at Goats —
In the name of Baphomet – “We’ll slit your throats” —

We’ll do our damnedest to get our work done —
COINTELPRO basics course one hundred and one! (101)

We know that TRUTH must never be clear –
For that is the one thing we truly do fear —

So —- we’ll lie and we’ll cheat and we’ll throw under the bus –
Anyone who dares to TRY expose us!

So, WHO’S WHO IN THE ZOO?  The answer is simple –
BEWARE those who never divulge:  the TRUE CAUSE of the POISON infecting the PIMPLE.

 ZIONISM = SATANISM!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

QUOTE OF THE DECADE!!

The Quote of the Decade

“The fact that we are here today to debate raising America ‘s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure.  It is a sign that the US Government can not pay its own bills.  It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government’s reckless fiscal policies.  Increasing America ‘s debt weakens us domestically and internationally.  Leadership means that, “the buck stops here.’  Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren.  America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better.”

Senator Barack H. Obama, March 2006

Nothing else needs to be said!   If as Obama declared this “debt ceiling” saga is a “Three-Ring Circus” – then without a doubt Obama is the CLOWN!!!

This is a very complex and multi-faceted topic.  It involves exposing something called “Kabalah” (the CUBE) as well as “Enochian Magic” and the darkest sorcery ever performed on Planet Earth.   It involves exposing demonology and inter-dimensional “conjuring” of entities called Nephilim or Jinn.   In short, this topic exposes the very antithesis of PURE, UNDEFILED CHRISTIANITY – which simply is the “Edomite-Jew” Sorcerers and their Satanic rituals.

You see, in order for the Sons and Daughters of Cain (or Kane as they are sometimes known, either a female “Mother Goddess” or male “SORCERER”) to punch a hole in this earth’s electromagnetic plane, (aka the ‘veil’, aka ‘the Watchtowers’, aka the ‘enmity’ between the children of Eve and Satan) certain protocols of quantum physics must be followed.   The BLACK CUBE (Kabalah) has instructed the literal Children of Satan the world over how the conjuring and controlling of powerful demonic entities (they falsely believe they can actually control these entities) can be accomplished;  that by utilizing certain geometrical lines combined with very specific harmonic frequencies of sound – the protective “WATCHTOWERS” can be temporarily disabled, allowing very real and very powerful demonic “fallen angels” to communicate with the sorcerer or the “Mother Goddess” witch.

Stanley Kubrick’s final Hollywood movie, “Eyes Wide Shut” reveals this hidden truth.   In the movie, Tom Cruise’s character meets an old friend – a MUSICIAN who tells him of a special gig – where he is payed very well simply to repetitively play a series of special HARMONIC CHORDS during a deeply occult ritual.  He does this while blindfolded the entire time.    This is the central theme of the entire movie – and a very real secret that possibly cost Kubrick (a Hollywood insider if there ever was one) his very life.

528 Frequency Chords in Illuminati Ritual.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Keep in mind that this ritual is not of modern origin.  It has been practiced by the Edomite Satanists since the days of Babylon.   It is a multi-generational practice and it involves HUMAN SACRIFICE and the SATANIC “SAC-RA-MENT”  the consumption of the SAC-rificed victim’s literal blood and flesh.

The British General, LORD Cornwallis, was an initiate who fully understood this dark and unholy secret.  Likely to save face following his “surrender” to Washington, Cornwallis in a last-ditch effort to salvage his ego, divulged the hidden agenda of the Edomite bloodlines by declaring to Washington and his adjutants:

“A holy war will now begin on America, and when it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown.”

Cornwallis went on to explain to his shocked audience what would seem initially to be a self contradiction: “Your churches will be used to teach the Jew’s religion and in less than two hundred years the whole nation will be working for divine world government. That government that they believe to be divine will be the British Empire. All religions will be permeated with Judaism without even being noticed by the masses, and they will all be under the invisible all-seeing eye of the Grand Architect of Freemasonry.

Lord Cornwallis’ declaration to Washington and his staff as a royal English occult insider was witnessed and recorded by a man named Jonathan Williams, who published a book exposing this event in the year 1781 titled Legions of Satan.

It is clear to this writer that Cornwallis’ predictions have all happened.  Cornwallis, as a participant in the Illuminati rituals, knew well that his military defeat was only the beginning of the fulfillment of a global SATANIC PROPHECY that would be universal and that unrest would continue until mind control could be accomplished via a Satan’s EDOMITE religion.

Again, what Cornwallis predicted has come to pass. A brief study of American religious history reveals that the Luciferian, Edomite, “B’nai B’rith scourge of Masonry was systematically infused into every church in America with their veiled Phallic religion. Darby and the Plymouth Brethren brought a Jewish  brand of “Christianity” to America. 33rd Degree Masons Rutherford and Russell started Jehovah Witnesses’ corrupt version of Judaism which is now worldwide with their message of the divine “kingdom” replacing the simple, pure Gospel of Christ. 33rd Degree Mason Joseph Smith started Mormon Judaism with its Edomite-Jewish teaching of millennialism.  We see Mormon “apostle” Orson Hyde establishing “Zionism” by means of a highly occultic “dedicatory prayer circle” conducted at the very Mount of Olives where Christ walked – dedicating all of Lucifer’s “Holy Melchizedek Priesthood” power and authority to have the Babylonian Seed of Cain control the entire Middle East by means of their Satanic conjuring.

Moreover, at the turn of the twentieth century the “Scofield Bible” with a Babylonian-Jewish interpretation of the prophecies made its appearance. Following the  wide use of this “helpful” aid the vast majority of the American “Christian” churches have silently become synagogues.

In the words of blogger Mantuan Bard: “We now have Baptist Jews, Methodist Jews, Church of God Jews, apostate Catholic Jews, and many Protestant Jews throughout America. We are aliens in our own country because of false religion and false teachings. All are praying for divine deliverance into that “Divine Government” which Cornwallis knew to be the British Empire. A false religion has been used to deceive us into allegiance to our enemies of Yorktown and Bunker Hill. No! Not a gun has been fired but the invisible and malignant process of conquering America with the Jew’s religion has gone on unabated. The Union Jack has been planted in our hearts with religious deception. All has happened “legally,” “constitutionally,” “freely” and completely within our most sacred trust — our churches.”

Indeed!

This is a message that the late William Cooper expounded upon in great detail.  No wonder he was gunned down!!

 

For the inside “Story Behind the Story” of the 528 Hz. “FREQUENCY OF THE PLANET SATURN (Satan)” take a few minutes and watch these two presentations.  They are very important pieces of the puzzle.

And finally – PLEASE DON’T BE DECEIVED BY LEONARD HOROWITZ AND HIS DECLARATIONS THAT 528 IS THE “GREEN-YELLOW” FREQUENCY OF LOVE.   It is not.  528 hz is the single most powerful “magic window frequency” employed by the biblical “Horites” (where the surname “Horowitz” originated) ancestry to perform black magic sorcery since the days of Cain.    Follow the bloodline trail in Genesis and throughout the entire Pentateuch and this becomes readily apparent.  This is the progeny of Esau (who is Edom) as recorded in Genesis Chapter 36.  The Horites made a strategic alliance with the Demons of antiquity, according to the Holy Bible.  They have used Enochian Magic since it was first revealed to Enoch, the SON OF CAIN (Genesis 4:17) in order to consult and direct the demonic entities into this “earth plane” to further their Luciferian agenda.   THIS IS THE GRAND SECRET!!   The “Horites” have been the scourge of planet earth for thousands of years.  The agenda is quite simple, really.  It is to capture the heart, mind and souls of all mankind in the Luciferian/Edomite blasphemies.

Don’t be deceived, Christians.  Hor-witz of the Horites did not invent the wheel with his “book” on 528 hz.  This DNA-altering frequency (the key to “shape-shifting” and DNA alteration in “shamanism”) has been used by Mother Goddesses and Sorcerers of the Dark Arts since it was first revealed to Enoch the son of Cain.  Here is just one example — a “Mother Goddess”  taking the Edomite black-sorcery title “Shekinah” (who in the Kaballah invokes the ARCH-DEMON Azazel) shows how the 528 hz had been historically invoked via the human vocal chords, or “Cantors” (the origins of the word in-cant-ation involves “cantor”).  This was practiced in Egypt by the Pharaoh (Pharisee) Annubis – who could walk the earth as either a wolf/jackal, or a man.  This is the origins of Native American “Skin-walkers” — called Innupits by the Utes and Piute Tribes (phonetically identical to Annubis oddly enough.)

“Language of Light”?   Indeed, but please understand Lucifer is the “Son of the Morning” – the “Illuminated One”.  This “528 hz” is indeed the Language of Lucifer – the green-yellow Serpent-God of antiquity.

And what of “Ascension”?   Remember Christ’s teaching that those who “Exalt Themselves” shall be “Abased” or brought down.  It is only through HUMILITY and ACCEPTANCE OF CHRIST, can one ever hope to ascend from the pit of Hell.   It is not a HUMANISTIC MEDITATION PROCESS – it is a free Gift of Grace from The Father, and Him alone!

 

 

House Passes DeFazio’s Amendment to Audit the Pentagon.  GREAT JOB CONGRESSMAN!!!!

This is all about accountability in government – something that to date has BEEN SORELY LACKING.

No More DUAL ISRAELI CITIZENS such as Dov Zackheim controlling the Pentagon’s purse strings!!  Never forget the 2.3 trillion dollars that went to Israel via Zackheim!!!!  NEVER FORGET that the wing of the Pentagon destroyed on 9-11-2001 held the financial records showing the paper trail!!!  NEVER FORGET that WTC Building 7 was “ground zero” for the SEC and FBI investigations into the culpability of Zackheim and his co-conspirators!!!!  NEVER FORGET that Larry Silverstein and Rupert Murdoch are colleagues of Dov ZACKHEIM in this mass murder to get gain scheme!!!!!   NEVER FORGET these TRUTHS, America!!!!

Be sure and review my Power Point Presentation – Top Secret America —- Top Secret America

This was prepared and delivered a year ago at the “Axiom” Conference in SLC Utah.  I was promised a professional video tape of the presentation.  This was to be accomplished by Alex Jones’ video team.  It never materialized.   One can only wonder WHY!!!

This is the ultimate truth behind the events of 9-11.  Zackheim and company had Motive (2.3 trillion dollars or more embezzled to Israel).  They had Opportunity – (Zackheim had access via SPC and Silverstein to ALL AREAS of the WTC). They had MEANS (Mossad and the Pentagon supplied weapons grade thermite, and tactical mini-nukes in the twin tower’s underground pillars.)

Now you know why the B’Nai B’Rith Anti-Defamation League has sent Horowitz and Kane, the “alternative health” industry’s “agent provocateurs” to attack me and my colleagues.   In Horowitz’ e-mail to me:  “HOW DARE YOU REVEAL YOURSELF AS A ‘JEW-HATING MAN’?”

http://www.defazio.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=717:house-passes-defazio-amendment-to-audit-the-pentagon-&catid=63:2011-news

HOUSE PASSES DEFAZIO AMENDMENT TO AUDIT THE PENTAGON

Amendment would audit Pentagon spending and provide budgetary transparency

 

WASHINGTON, DC – Yesterday, Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-OR) offered a bipartisan amendment to force the Pentagon to produce auditable financial statements providing a clearer picture of how it spends tens of billions of taxpayer dollars each year. The House passed the amendment unanimously.

Currently, federal law exempts the Pentagon from conducting an audit. DeFazio’s amendment would reverse this exemption.

“The Pentagon has spent more than $10 trillion since 1990 and will spend over $4 trillion over the next four years without ever passing an audit,” said DeFazio. “As Congress debates substantial cuts to programs that help middle class families, we need a clear picture that allows us to target wasteful and duplicative spending. The Pentagon needs to be audited just like every other federal agency in order to achieve significant budget savings.”

Federal law requires all federal agencies to produce auditable financial statements on a yearly basis.  However, the Pentagon has never passed an audit and over the last 30 years the Department of Defense  Inspector General and the General Accounting Office (GAO) have documented serious errors in the Pentagon’s financial record keeping. For example, a March 2000 Inspector General report found that nearly one third of the accounting entries in the Pentagon’s $7.6 billion budget were untraceable. In FY 2010, nearly half of the contracts awards in the Pentagon’s $366 billion were not fully completed.

“There is no reason that the largest and most expensive agency in the federal government should hide its financial books from scrutiny,” said DeFazio. “We need to ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently and effectively and this amendment would help achieve that goal.”

The Pentagon was given an exemption to federal law in 2005, allowing it to avoid completing audits on a yearly basis.  The exemption was contained in Section 376 of the Fiscal Year 2006 National Defense Authorization Act.  DeFazio’s amendment has the effect of repealing the exemption.

 

BACKGROUND

 

In 1990, Congress passed a law requiring all federal agencies – including DoD – to present auditable financial statements.

But for the last two decades, the Pentagon has never passed an audit.  In fact, beginning in 1995, the Government Accountability Office documented serious errors in the agency’s financial statements and designated DoD’s financial management problems as “high risk.”

In response, in 2001, Congress directed DoD to improve its financial management policies, procedures, and internal controls to make sure its audits were accurate and complete.  This gentle nudge from Congress did not change DoD’s ways.

In 2005, Congress barred the Department of Defense from obligating or expending funds to complete an audit until the Secretary submits a financial management improvement plan.  The ban on completing an audit is contained in Section 376 of the Fiscal Year 2006 National Defense Authorization Act.

In 2009, Congress set a “goal” – not a mandate – to complete an audit by September 30, 2017.  Yet, during a September 2010 hearing, Pentagon officials stated that meeting the 2017 timeline may not be realistic and the agency may need more money from Congress to achieve full auditability.

The Department of Defense continues to shirk its fiduciary responsibilities under the law as Congress continues to appropriate record level defense budgets.

Edgar Steele Story PART II

Sex, Lies & Audiotape (Part II)
by Edgar J. Steele

Here Come de Fix

I had an inkling that the fix was in on the morning of the second day of the pretrial hearing concerning our forensic audiology eperts. The lead prosecutor, Assistant US Attorney Traci Whelan, was smiling, humming to herself and positively chirping happily to others before court convened. Never have I seen an attorney, least of all her, look so happy and confident going into a crucial hearing. Clearly, she knew what would be the court’s ruling, though experience should have told her she was losing on the issue of audiology experts and losing badly. She knew. How, do you suppose?

Of course, I already explained (Part I) how the judge later would rule (later that same day) that we could not put either of our audio experts on the witness stand during the trial.

A Work in Progress

My wife, after listening to the recordings several times on different occasions, also swears that they have “evolved” through time, with different wording in places. It seems that, each time someone noticed something blatantly wrong with the recordings, they then changed, apparently solving problems.

I knew that the recordings would be good when I first was told about them – of “Mission Impossible” quality, in fact. Even so, I was unprepared for what I heard as my Public Defender, Roger Peven, played them for me. Peven made it clear at the outset that he believed the recordings were genuine, and his conviction remains unshaken to this day, for all I know. I confess that Peven’s certitude shook me to the core, but nothing like the recordings themselves did.

Listening to the recordings was one of the most excruciating experiences of my life. I heard a voice that sounded like my own, saying some of the most outrageous things possible. At points, I heard familiar words and phrases that I often use. I even heard whole segments that I recalled saying in the past. Only later would I reflect upon how over the top was the total effect; how scripted it all sounded.
Hearing what seemed to be my voice discussing the deaths of my wife and her mother with this bumbling and oafish handyman, of all people, pushed me over the edge. I became violently ill upon returning to my cell. In retrospect, I now realize that I suffered what commonly is known as a nervous breakdown.Evil Edgar

My Cyndi! My best friend and lover. My sweetheart. My Girl. How could it happen? For two weeks, I was in agony, pacing aimlessly in my cell, sick to the point of vomiting almost daily.

At the time, I had a world of respect for my public defender, Roger Peven, so his opinions carried a good deal of weight with me. He thought the recordings were real, so I had to consider the possibility that my personality had split under the pressure of four major surgeries in six months and all the drugs I had been taking at the time (more on this in a future installment I call “Evil Edgar”). After all, I did seem to have a great many blank spots in my memory, like a videotaped movie with whole scenes erased, seemingly at random. Could it be?

Meanwhile, I finally persuaded the jailhouse doctor to prescribe an anti-depressant for me. Increasing the dosage twice in the weeks to come seemed finally to bring me some relief. I was sleeping again.

Ceaselessly, as a dog with a bone, I replayed sections of those recordings in my head. The segment that bothered me the most was a brief monologue “I” delivered on the danger of Cyndi not dying and merely being turned into a paraplegic for whom I would be forced to care for. (Nonsense! I would be honored and pleased to care for her the rest of my life! I could no sooner walk away from her than voluntarily stop breathing air.)

“Don’t touch him,” I supposedly said on one recording, referring to Cyndi’s (nonexistent) boyfriend. Wait a minute, I thought, if she had a boyfriend (she never has), why wasn’t he the plot’s target, instead of my wife? I loved her enough to be jealous of her, but not enough to want her alive? Slowly, serious doubts began bubbling to the surface of my mind.

A Little Truth

Some parts of the recordings did ring true, such as my paying Fairfax $400 for two tires he had bought to replace what he damaged on my pickup. At trial, that $400 was portrayed as my down payment on the hit, though the Handyman Hit Man also claimed he already had been paid in silver bullion (yes, before the “down payment!”). Ask yourself why I would give him a $400 down payment if I already had paid him in full for the “hit,” $10,000 in silver bullion that Fairfax, at trial, finally was to admit that he himself took from its hidey-hole. Yet another hard-to-believe piece of the government’s case. A lie? “Obviously.”

Much of the recordings was foreign to me, though. Why, I asked myself, would I pay to have Cyndi’s mother killed? She never had been anything but good to the children and me. Besides, though I hate to say it because of the impact upon Cyndi, she already is dying and spends as much time in the hospital as she does at home (where she lives alone in another state). Clearly, she already doesn’t have long to live. Know that I regret the pain that saying this means for my Cyndi, but I feel it must be said. Of course, since Cyndi’s mother lives in another state, a plot also against her would confer legal jurisdiction on the Federal Government (the FBI).

Both recordings started with the same introduction by FBI Agent Sotka before he allegedly planted the recorder on Larry the Idahun Hit Man. And both recordings started precisely at “6:02 pm.” Odd, eh? Just coincidence, I am sure.

And, wouldn’t there have been small talk between Fairfax and Sotka at the start and end of those recordings (e.g. “Hello,” “got your tic tacs?” “Good luck,” “how did it go?” “Good bye.”)?

Also, though the prosecutor made a big thing about a train whistle heard that marked the passage of a train over two miles away every day at about 6:15 pm, she failed to draw the jury’s attention to the fact that the whistle appeared nine times on one of the recordings, but not at all on the other. Besides, though one can hear that train when standing in front of the house (or parked on the road out front), it is impossible to hear in the barn, where both recordings supposedly took place.

I was almost convinced after just one hearing of the two recordings. Meanwhile, Cyndi, who is much more familiar with my voice than I, required just one hearing to pronounce them both fakes, a fact withheld from me until after the trial, nearly a year later, when she and I finally were allowed to talk with each other about the case. It took me a long time to reach that conclusion, though I was certain of it during the first month or so after I was arrested.

Lies

The governments two faked recordings were the biggest lies told at the trial, Cyndi later was to write of differences within those recordings: “What I found odd is that there were distinct differences between non-plot subjects being discussed and the plot being discussed.
1. “Non-plot conversations: easier to hear, voice resembled my husband’s voice.”

2. “Plot conversations: much harder to hear, husband’s voice seems strange, different and odd to me… intonation was wrong… fluctuation in the voice was wrong… diction and pronunciation of words were wrong… sentences were off grammatically… ends of words were as if they were cut off or being dropped; Ed speaks clearer than that.”

Cyndi also noted that, “There were a lot of things that I had heard my husband say to (Larry Fairfax) many times in conversations about a work project that (Fairfax) was doing for us.” This time, however, those phrases popped up appended to plot details supposedly under discussion between Fairfax and myself.

Cyndi also later would write that, “there were a lot of things that seemed like they were out of other conversations that my husband had in his office or our bedroom.” Such as, “Following Ed’s aortic aneurysm in Nov. 2009, he spoke a lot about never wanting to end up in a vegetative state or a paraplegic and that he would rather be dead than for his children or I left to take care of him.”

More Lies
The discussion between Cyndi and FBI Agent Sotka following the playing of the recordings was especially revealing: “When I tried to tell the FBI agents that I didn’t trust these tapes and they didn’t prove anything to me, Agent Sotka only became argumentative, defensive and went to great lengths to try to convince me that I was wrong and how they wouldn’t lie. Sotka didn’t want to hear my opinion of the tapes. He made it very clear that he didn’t want to hear anything other than what they wanted me to say.”

At this meeting, Cyndi was shown a document verifying the recordings “were authentic and not altered.” Interestingly, during a court hearing several months later, the government was to claim that it had not yet had an opportunity to analyze the recordings in response to our “surprise” claim that they were false.

Sotka’s big admission at trial: During his testimony, FBI Agent Sotka for the first time admitted that, after downloading (copying) the recordings to a computer, he made second-generation CD copies, he destroyed the originals, after they allegedly had been made, so that only Agent Sotka ever heard the originals. Yes, you heard that right. Sotka admitted under oath to being the only person who ever had heard the original recordings, after which he destroyed them. This finally came out because Sotka was unable to produce the original mini discs at trial, as demanded by our subpoena. They had been erased, he was finally forced to admit.

Still More Lies

Sotka stalled for ten days, until June 21, when he finally agreed to let Cyndi hear the recordings. Even then, however, Sotka would claim the third recording (of conversations during my arrest of June 11) was “not yet ready.” They never have let Cyndi hear that third recording, nor me, either, nor was it played at trial. What was needed to get it ready, do you suppose? The same “processing” that required them to keep Cyndi away from the first two recordings for ten days?

Reportedly, it has now slipped out that the third recording has a one-hour gap, which is why, I suppose, released just a transcript of that recording, transcript not yet provided to Cyndi or to me. Just coincidence, I am sure, that the third recording would prove both FBI Agent Sotka and ISP Trooper Spike in their (evidentially improper) testimony about my reaction to their lies to me about the deaths of both Cyndi and her mother. At the end of that tens days, during which Cyndi was prevented from hearing the recordings ( I wasn’t to be allowed to her them for another two months), the pipe bomb was discovered on our car.

When finally allowed to listen to the first two recordings, Cyndi plainly heard the word “bomb,” but not the word “car,” which was to appear, as if by magic, sometime later. Sotka told Cyndi he had listened to the two conversations as they were being recorded (yet another lie, it turned out), even taking notes, but somehow missed mention of any “bomb.” Sotka later was to testify that he listened to the recordings twice before he destroyed the originals. Of course, if he had heard “bomb,” then he would have had to warn Cyndi, which Sotka never did. After she drove back from Oregon? Nor did Sotka’s supervisor or AUSA Whelan, who listened to the June 9th recording (the recording that now has the word “bomb”) the very next morning (June 10th), warn Cyndi. Or, perhaps “bomb” was never on the original tapes at all. It seems that both Assistant US Attorneys Whelan and Hawes, not to mention their boss and any member of FBI and Justice Department employees, would have heard “bomb” on the recordings if it was there early on… doesn’t it?

Cyndi drove around for a week (from June 9th to the 15th), through three different states, before the bomb’s discovery. When do you suppose the bomb was added to her car? Could it have been after the word “bomb” was added to the tape? After I was arrested? Just asking.

The Sex

In a truly bizarre development, one month later FBI Agent Sotka was to admit to my wife that he “liked” her. Make of that what you will. I’m not sure what Sotka meant, but I don’t think I like it.

No, that wasn’t the “sex” promised by the title, but you have heard just some of the many, many lies that FBI Agent Sotka told in this case. I admit that I adapted the title of this chapter from a mediocre movie of several years ago, but there is sex to come (so to speak), when I tell you about all my Ukrainian “girlfriends” (over 100 of them)… (I suppose you could call that lots of sex, since every single one of these young ladies is drop-dead gorgeous).

Keep in mind those world-class experts we retained to examine the recordings for authenticity; the forensic audiology experts who both independently found the recordings to be packed with indications of dubbing, splicing and editing. That is the single most critical fact in the case, a fact that the judge refused to allow us to get before the jury. The omission led to my conviction.

Previous: Sex, Lies & Audiotape (Part I)
Next: Who? Why?

Copyright ©2011,Edgar J. Steele
Forward as you wish. Permission is granted to circulate this article
and its related audio file among private individuals and groups,
post on all Internet sites and publish in full in all not-for-profit
publications. Contact author for all other rights, which are reserved.

FBI Stings Edgar Steele — Conviction Appears Rigged

Attorney Edgar Steele was clearly on the B’nai B’rith ADL hit list.  He represented Aryan supremacists and actually promoted their rhetoric – exposing to the best of his ability the “Khazarian” agenda.   He was eloquent and believable in his presentations.

So, the FBI supplied an undercover maintenance man to work for Mr. Steele.   This undercover agent allegedly tape-recorded Mr. Steele plotting to blow up his wife’s vehicle.

It seems the Idaho FBI has an endless supply of “hit men” undercover agents.  See http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/mobile/52212101-90/polatis-rogers-hire-kill.html.csp

The KEY PIECE of “evidence” was an audio tape recording.  Strange  – Edgar’s wife Cynthia Steele remains his biggest and most vocal supporter.  She believes completely in his innocence.   There is a VERY STRONG POSSIBILITY that this audio tape was MANUFACTURED.

Here is Steele’s explanation of the events at the “trial”.

Sex, Lies & Audiotape (Part I)
by Edgar J. Steele

The jury never heard even a hint about the single most important piece of evidence in the Government’s case in my defense at trial: proof that the government’s evidence, the two recordings, were phony. Without those recordings, the government’s case against me literally disappeared.

What’s that? You say that there must be something wrong? That I am failing to tell you everything? Nope. Ask anybody who was at that pre-trial hearing that took longer than my entire defense at trial. Judge Winmill ruled that I could not present any evidence disputing the authenticity of the audiotapes.

Why?

Why? For two reasons, said the judge – one for each of the two forensic audiology experts we flew in from New York and New Mexico, respectively, for the hearing and the trial.

Not Qualified?!?

The first expert, Dennis Walsh, with over 20 years experience in handling and analyzing audio recordings for the New York City Police Department, who owns a company that does nothing but analyze recordings, was declared “not qualified” to render an opinion. Not qualified? Excuse me? Walsh was doing this before it was science! In a moment, I will give you Walsh’s conclusions; then you will see why the court and the government had to prevent his testimony at any cost.

Irrelevant?!?

My second expert, Dr. George Papcun (pronounced “Pap’-sun”), could not possibly be deemed unqualified, given the fact that he is the world’s leading expert in forensic audiology. Papcun literally invented the discipline’s terms and wrote the book “that others throughout the world rely upon.” Papcun couldn’t testify, said the judge, because he was irrelevant, because nobody had put the authenticity of the tapes into question. Yes, you heard that correctly, regardless of how ridiculous it sounds. And the judge said it right out loud, with a straight face. Why wasn’t the listing of Walsh and Papcun as experts with the court (and filing their written opinions that the recordings were false) enough to put the authenticity of the recordings “into question?” Why didn’t my husband-wife-privileged jailhouse call, in which I averred the “tapes” had to be false, enough to trigger the authenticity issue? For that matter, why wasn’t my “not guilty” plea enough? Why wasn’t my expert’s testimony for 1-½ days in a pretrial hearing “enough?” Incidentally the judge ruled that I had waived that privilege, so that the call became the source of yet another federal charge calling for 20 years in prison.

Then the judge said he might change his mind if a “party to the recordings” testified during the upcoming trial (now just 3 days away) that something had been deleted or added to them. B-b-but, Judge – that leaves only Larry Fairfax, the Idahun Hit Man, since I wasn’t really a “party” to them. So, Judge, you are saying that, if I waive my Constitutional right not to take the stand, I might somehow be able to dispute the recordings’ authenticity? Really? Of course, you know that a defendant always testifies last, if at all? You are forcing me to choose between my constitutional rights and a key witness? The key witness? I felt as though I had “gone through the looking glass” and now was subject to the tyranny of the Red Queen.

I don’t know if Judge Winmill knew that Dr. Papcun long ago had prepaid $48,000 (non-refundable) for his and his wife’s dream vacation of a lifetime to Tahiti, scheduled to depart just two days later. Dr. Papcun had offered to stay for the trial despite that vacation (that could not be rescheduled), if the judge ruled that he could testify and if we could put him on the stand early, out of order and ahead of the state’s case against me. But the judge said Papcun couldn’t testify, so off he flew to Tahiti.

When Yes Means No

I honestly don’t know if the judge knew Dr. Papcun’s vacation before the trial, but he sure knew about it during the second week of trial when he inexplicably reversed himself, saying Papcun (but not Walsh, of course) could testify at trial, provided he was in the courtroom at 8:30 am, two days later. The US Attorney knew about Papcun’s vacation in advance, because she was secretly requiring the jail to provide her recordings of all my calls from jail, even those made to lawyers, during which I discussed Papcun at length. Now it was too late to subpoena Papcun, but we could get him back on the next commercial flight if we hurried. He agreed to come back, but asked if there was any other way. We thought there was another way.

Yes, I know I promised to quote for you both experts’ written opinions, but a couple more incredible twists to the Papcun saga yet remain to be told. My lawyer informed the judge that Dr. Papcun was on the other side of the world and, though there just barely was enough time to get him back to Boise by commercial jet by the Judge’s deadline and though he was willing to come, could we simply have him testify by videophone satellite uplink, over the internet? “Yes,” said the judge. However, the very next morning and with only 24 hours to go, the judge acceded to the US Attorney’s renewed demand that Papcun testify only in person. Why? So that she could “more effectively cross-examine” Dr. Papcun! Keep in mind that this selfsame US Attorney had cross-examined both Dr. Papcun and Mr. Walsh in person and on the same witness stand, just 3 days before trial, for 1-½ days!

This is the same judge who ruled that I had no constitutional right to confront witnesses against me at trial, allowing the videotaped deposition of Tatiyana Loganova to be played for the jury.

The smell arising from this sordid little interlude just gets stronger, doesn’t it? Well, hold on, because it gets worse.

The Stench of Real Injustice

 

With less than 24 hours to go, the only way we now could get Papcun to Boise by 8:30 am the next morning would be by charter jet. We found one, incredibly enough, located in a place where it actually could make it to Tahiti, pick up Dr. Papcun and fly him to Boise just prior to the Judge’s deadline… for $180,000! Cash in advance, of course.

 

My friends sucked it up and calculated that, together, they could just barely pull together $180,000 that same morning. When they called the jet charter company back, however, less than one hour after getting the all-clear signal from it, the tension on the phone line was palpable. No, they didn’t want to rent us the jet, after all. No, they had no idea who could or would, on such short notice. “Have a nice day.” <click> With that, my hopes for an acquittal disappeared.

We couldn’t challenge the recordings, so the jury concluded they were real, of course. The only thing my lawyer was allowed to say during closing argument was that there was a “problem with the recordings,” and that only because my wife and daughter had sworn on the stand they were phony and that it didn’t even sound like me in many places. Despite the fact that my wife and daughter literally are the world’s leading experts on how I sound and, though their testimony went unrefuted, the government convinced the jury that I really had said all those terrible things.

Audiotape

Now, let’s see what Dr. Papcun said in his pretrial written report:

“Both recordings contain numerous electronic signatures… such as would be caused by dubbing… and/or editing…”

“Both recordings contain gaps…”

“Both recordings are of poor quality… with the recording volume at a very low level, which would conceal irregularities and defects in the recordings.”

“There are discrepancies in the relative volumes of the speakers.”

On one of the tapes, “there appears an extraneous voice.”

“… I conclude, within a reasonable degree of scientific probability that the recordings… are unreliable.”

“With commonly available methods, it is possible to remove material, insert material and alter the meaning of conversations.”

Dr. Papcun also said that “electronic transients may be caused by various events such as the following: turning equipment on and off, changing components, connecting or disconnecting components, microphone malfunctions, other equipment malfunctions (and/or) attempts at splicing or otherwise editing or modifying recordings.” Every single one of the foregoing “events” was ruled out by uncontroverted evidence presented by the government, all except the last item, that is: “attempts at splicing or otherwise editing or modifying recordings.”

Remember my other expert, Dennis Walsh? He adopted all of Dr. Papcun’s conclusions and went even further. Walsh’s written opinion also said:

“I conclude, with a reasonable degree of scientific probability that the recordings contain different speakers purported to be that of Edgar Steele.” (emphasis added)

In direct testimony on the witness stand during the 1-½ day pretrial hearing on audiology experts, Mr. Walsh went still further and stated his certainty that the tapes had been “manufactured” and were wholly unreliable.

Next: Here Come de Fix

 

Copyright ©2011,Edgar J. Steele   Forward as you wish.Contact author for all other rights, which are reserved.

 

Murd – Och = Mur – Der = Genocide!

Murdoch and Vaccines: Exposure of Crimes Reveals a Much Larger Story

By William Newton

“… the evidence of sleazy and scandalous behavior of the Murdoch papers has expanded geometrically.” Michael Collins

Rupert Murdoch’s news empire faces intense media and legal scrutiny.  Current revelations focus on Murdoch’s News of the World hacking into the Dowler family’s voice messages during the kidnapping of their 12 year old daughter Milly, and Murdoch’s London Times for allegedly having illegally obtained the financial, property and medical information of former UK Labour Party Leader Gordon Brown during the time he was chancellor. [Image]

A 2010 exposure of Murdoch’s Times of London revealed that it had published forged documents purporting to show that Iran planned to do nuclear experiments for an atomic weapon, and as Collins points out, it was Murdoch’s “drumbeat of misinformation” that helped mislead people into believing that Saddam Hussein was involved in the 9/11 attack, supporting Bush’s invasion of Iraq, though intelligence was “unsubstantiated, contradicted, or even non-existent,” according to the Senate Intelligence Committee Unveils Final Phase II Reports on Prewar Iraq Intelligence from June 5, 2008.

But what has not yet been covered is the media circus Murdoch’s London Times created internationally as it fabricated lies against a respected British doctor, with consequences that could impact the lives of billions of children in the world.

The London Times headlines read:

Callous, unethical and dishonest’: Dr Andrew Wakefield
MMR scare doctor Andrew Wakefield makes fortune in US,
Andrew Wakefield & MMR – the investigation – by Brian Deer,
London Times: MMR doctor Andrew Wakefield ’abused his position of trust.’

Andrew Wakefield was a respected British gastroenterologist who began research into digestive problems in autistic children in collaboration with other doctors in the UK, after being called by parents seeking help.  His work indicated severe digestive issues and he asked for more investigation of the MMR vaccine.

Brian Deer is the reporter who savaged Dr Wakefield from the pages of the Sunday Times, a paper managed by Rupert Murdoch’s son James Murdoch who is on the board of GlaxoSmithKline which makes the MMR.  Deer researched his case with the help of Medico-Legal Investigations, a private enquiry company whose only source of funding is the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry.  Deer was both the journalist writing on Wakefield and the person who brought a case of fitness to practice medicine to the General Medical Council, and then wrote about the proceedings as well.

Parents whose children were treated by Wakefield were denied the right to be heard before a real court on claims against the vaccine manufacturers.  The High Court judge who denied them was Sir Nigel Davis, whose brother is an executive board member of Elsevier, publishers of the Lancet which removed Wakefield’s 1998 paper on the subject, and is on the Board of GlaxoSmithKline.

With the London Times giving Brian Deer free reign to attack Wakefield, media closed in like shark.  Coincidentally, the head of Reuters serves on the Board of Merck, and Miriam Stoppard who writes at the Daily Mirror newspaper is married to Sir Christopher Hogg, who was Chairman of GlaxoSmith Kline in 2004.  Dr Kumar, the Chairman of the GMC Fitness to Practice Panel who ruled against Dr Andrew Wakefield, would not answer questions about his shareholdings in GlaxoSmithKline, and said there was no such thing as vaccine damage and that any parents who claimed that their children had suffered such would be treated with scorn and contempt.

Wakefield lost his license to practice and left the UK.  What had he done that Murdoch’s machine went into action, creating fictions about him, getting his work pulled from the Lancet, getting him brought before the GMC to ultimately lose his license?

Wakefield suggested that until further studies, the measles vaccine should be given as a separate vaccine rather than in combination as the MMR (measles, Mumps, Rubella).  He did not suggest that children not take a measles vaccine, only that there be caution until the MMR was investigated further. This reasonable suggestion was met immediately by the single measles vaccines being taken off the market.

Wakefield’s work with Professor Walker-Smith and Professor Simon Murch had touched a nerve.  The pharmaceutical industry, an industry that makes six times more than any industry on Wall Street is heavily invested in vaccines (in the US, the companies do not have to prove efficacy to get FDA approval) and is moving on every front to have their product mandated.

To suggest that one of the main vaccines for children might be destroying them mentally and physiologically was a problem, yet the study showed severe digestive system damage and mitochondrial dysfunction, as well.  Mitochondrial dysfunction has been confirmed by other studies, but taking down Wakefield in a big way became a means of discrediting anyone questioning vaccines.  Wakefield was cast as a fraud and so all those voicing concerns were dismissed by reference to him.

This Alan Golding documentary gives background which can allow people to judge the credibility of Murdoch’s reporter for themselves:

To understand how serious all this is, and thus how much is at stake for millions if not billions of children, one needs to appreciate how profound it is for mitochondria not to function normally. Science Daily explains:

“Children with autism are far more likely to have deficits in their ability to produce cellular energy than are typically developing children, a new study by researchers at UC Davis has found. The study, published in theJournal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), found that cumulative damage and oxidative stress in mitochondria, the cell’s energy producer, could influence both the onset and severity of autism, suggesting a strong link between autism and mitochondrial defects…. Mitochondria are the primary source of energy production in cells and carry their own set of genetic instructions, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), to carry out aerobic respiration. Dysfunction in mitochondria already is associated with a number of other neurological conditions, including Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, schizophrenia ….”

One study cited in Wikipedia says:

“Mitochondrial disorders may be caused by mutations, acquired or inherited, in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) or in nuclear genes that code for mitochondrial components. They may also be the result of acquired mitochondrial dysfunction due to adverse effects of drugs, infections, or other environmental causes (see MeSH). … Defects in nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes are associated with hundreds of clinical disease phenotypes including anemi, dementia, hypertension, lymphoma, retinopathy, seizures, and neurodevelopmental disorders.”

In opening up the issue mitochrondrial dysfunction and urging a shift back to a single measles vaccine (an earlier vaccine), Wakefield may have stumbled onto something explosive.  The MMR vaccine appears to be the third generation of vaccines, what are called DNA vaccines. They involve shooting genetically engineered material into the body, often using gene guns that were used into the genetic engineering of seeds, in order to achieve DNA “uptake.”

From Wikipedia on methods of delivery of DNA Vaccines:

“The two most popular approaches are injection of DNA in saline, using a standard hypodermic needle, and gene gun delivery. … Injection in saline is normally conducted intramuscularly (IM) in skeletal muscle, or intradermally (ID), with DNA being delivered to the extracellular spaces. This can be assisted by electroporation; by temporarily damaging muscle fibres with myotoxins such as bupivacaine; or by using hypertonic solutions of saline or sucrose. Immune responses to this method of delivery can be affected by many factors, including needle type, needle alignment, speed of injection, volume of injection, muscle type, and age, sex and physiological condition of the animal being injected.

“Gene gun delivery, the other commonly used method of delivery, ballistically accelerates plasmid DNA (pDNA) that has been adsorbed onto gold or tungsten microparticles into the target cells, using compressed helium as an accelerant.

“Alternative delivery methods have included aerosol instillation of naked DNA on mucosal surfaces, such as the nasal and lung mucosa, and topical administration of pDNA to the eye and vaginal mucosa. Mucosal surface delivery has also been achieved using cationic liposome-DNA preparations, biodegradable microspheres, attenuated Shigella or Listeria vectors for oral administration to the intestinal mucosa, and recombinant [genetically engineered] adenovirus vectors.”

The DNA vaccines depend on DNA uptake.  However,”[t]his phenomenon has not been the subject of much research, so the actual mechanism of DNA uptake is not known.”

And what is meant by DNA uptake?  Does it mean as it sounds, that genetically engineered material is taken up by the DNA of those being injected with it?  And if so, does that mean that these vaccines are genetically altering (or “engineering”) those receiving the vaccines?

Is it possible that the mitochondrial dysfunction seen in autistic children is a result of their DNA having been compromised?  The new DNA vaccines derive from failed gene therapy.  Are the new DNA vaccines a continuation of experiments in genetic engineering, being conducted on millions of children?

Cloned animals also suffer from mitochondrial dysfunction. Professor Joe Cummins writes:

“In the cloned animals, mitochondria are transferred to the eggs along with the nucleus from somatic cells, leading to a mixture of mitochondrial genes from egg and the somatic cell from which the nucleus was obtained. This mixture of mitochondria (called heteroplasmy) introduces incompatibility between mitochondrial and nuclear genetic material that contribute to the high rates of abnormalities and deaths among clones and leads to cell and tissue disruption as the cloned animal develops. The impact of mitochondrial dysfunction is great because the mitochondria provide energy for the cells.”

It seems that people have already been genetically engineered.  “Dr. Joseph Cummins, professor emeritus of biology at the University of Western Ontario, says, ‘It seems likely that the transplants are going on, but very, very quietly in a regulatory vacuum, perhaps.’”

Also see these citations from that article:

Genetically-Engineered Humans. Barritt, Jason A., et al. “Mitochondria in Human Offspring Derived From Ooplasmic Transplantation.” Human Reproduction, 16.3 (2001), pp 513-6.

“First Cases of Human Germline Genetic Modification Announced.” British Medical Journal 322 (12 May 2001), p 1144.

“Genetically Modified Human Babies?” Australian Broadcasting Corporation, 8 May 2001.

Hawes, S.M., C. Sapienza, and K. E. Latham. “Ooplasmic Donation in Humans: The Potential for Epigenic Modifications.” Human Reproduction 17.4 (2002), 850-2. • Hill, Amelia.

“Horror at ‘Three Parent Foetus’ Gene Disorders.” Observer (London), 20 May 2001.

The 23 new DNA vaccines have been linked to autism.  Are the new DNA vaccines altering and/or damaging children’s DNA, the code of life?

An overview of Murdoch’s connections to the pharmaceutical industry and international bankers cannot answer that question but at a minimum suggest serious problems with vaccines with the greatest wealth power in the world promoting them, nonetheless. MedicalVeritas.org is credited with this piece:

“Lloyd Blankfein is co-chairman with media mogul Rupert Murdoch in the David Rockefeller-founded Partnership for New York City (PFNYC), chartered by the Royal Family of England. This group is currently advancing a world leading biotechnology trust, heavily invested in “genetopharmaceuticals” and flu vaccine genetic engineering. [Emphasis added.]

“Members of this group, along with George Soros-directed assets, virtually monopolized the genetics industry during the 1990s, culminating in the corporate privatization of the Human Genome Project.

“Involvement of these economic leaders in the vaccine industry is most revealing and even shocking as the following facts evidence:

“The Baxter Corporation, indicted for spreading HIV contaminated blood products during the late 1970s through the 1980s; a cheap lethal heparin substitute in 2008; and H5N1 contaminated seasonal flu vaccines in early 2009, was directed by Mr. Tony White, Soros’s appointee to lead the privately owned Applera Company following their obvious heist of the Human Genome Project during the late 1990s. The sudden privatization of what had previously been public, non-profit, patentable property, also implicated co-sponsors–the U.S. Department of Energy and The Wellcome Trust of London.

“Today, the American Baxter Company is a major H1N1 vaccine maker for European nations, and at the center of controversy concerning the expanding outbreak of recombinant H1N1-hemorrhagic pneumonia. Many experts conclude the 2009 H1N1 triple reassortant sourced from a lab, similar to its 1977 relative.

“Rupert Murdoch’s mother, Elizabeth, Dame Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire, and daughter-in-law, Sarah Murdoch, steward the Royal Women’s Hospital and Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, respectively, in Australia. They oversaw their staff conduct H1N1 vaccine trials on infants, children, and pregnant women in 2009, collaborating with Merck’s subsidiary, CSL.

“Furthermore, Rupert Murdoch’s son James oversees GlaxoSmithKline, another major H1N1 vaccine maker. Regarding efficacy, and more importantly safety, the CSL/Merck H1N1 vaccine tested in Murdoch-family directed facilities was simply assumed to be both safe and effective according to its package insert. The new and old vaccine had ‘no controlled clinical studies demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination with’ the company’s seasonal flu vaccine, ‘AFLURIA.’

“Likewise, vaccine safety was speciously assumed following assessment days comparing those who received AFLURIA (with or without mercury preservative, confounding everyone’s analysis) with those who received some undisclosed “European-licensed trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine as an active control.” This “active control” was preserved with mercury.

“In plainer language, an unidentified arguably neurotoxic vaccine served as a ‘placebo control.’ Since no inactive placebo control such as saline was used, the study design was obviously flawed, confounding, biased, and arguably fraudulent. It may have precluded observing statistically significant differences between experimental and control groups falsely evidencing safety from lacking adverse event differentials. This intentional obfuscation exclusively benefited those with conflicting interests, and/or those inclined to rely on safety assurances to the detriment of public health and medical science. Yet, Murdoch-directed News Corp. assets heavily promoted these risky H1N1 vaccines as urgently required, safe and effective.

“Curiously, in 2008, The Wellcome Trust of London’s Biocentre, the UK’s largest non-governmental source of funds for biomedical research, created a special grant program to heavily fund research into alleged mysterious neurodegenerative diseases linked by censored science to thimerosal mercury.

“The Wellcome Trust’s alleged divestment of conflicting pharmaceutical interests following Burroughs Wellcome’s sale of stock to Glaxo PLC, created GlaxoWellcome, currently GlaxoSmithKlein. This allegation of ‘divestment’ is discredited by more than the fund’s involvement in the Human Genome Project’s pirating, implicating George Soros and David Rockefeller-linked investors. Again, GlaxoSmithKlein makes the H1N1 vaccine, and Rupert Murdoch’s heir apparent, James Murdoch, oversees their Board of Directors.

“And that’s not all. . . Rupert Murdoch’s Co-Chairman of the PFNYC, Lloyd Blankfein is a major shareholder in the Goldman-Sachs/AstraZeneca partnership. He directed AstraZeneca’s $15 billion acquisition of MedImmune, the H1N1 FLUMIST maker.

“Besides James and Rupert’s News Corp directing film makers Twentieth Century Fox and Warner Brothers, the Western World’s mass-mediated mind-set is reinforced by PFNYC “partner” and Reuters News Service CEO, Thomas H. Glocer. Glocer sits on the Board of Directors of Merck & Company, whose (CSL) H1N1 vaccine, and (Merck’s) Pneumovax vaccine, is broadening markets as the main ingredient–laboratory engineered H1N1 virus–mutates, as in the Ukraine, becoming more deadly.

“Additionally, those poorly-paid inadequately-trained pharmacists administering vaccines in supermarkets, draining doctors’ revenue streams, reflect the ‘hostile takeover’ of clinical medicine by Goldman-Sachs’s limited partner, PFNYC ‘Corporate Partner,’ and world-leading ‘buyout firm,’ Kolberg, Kravitz, Roberts & Company (KKR) This ‘immunization’ industry-altering practice is promoted as a “cost-saving” invention according to KKR’s director of Safeway supermarkets, Steven Burd, founder of the Coalition to Advance Healthcare Reform (CAHR), popularly called ‘Obamacare.’”

Whatever the answer to questions about the new DNA vaccines, it is obvious that Rupert Murdoch’s connections to the pharmaceutical industry and vaccines are very deep.  No investigation of Murdoch’s crimes should omit his efforts to use his media empire to prevent exposure of potential dangers from the MMR vaccines and possibly all the new DNA vaccines.

Ritual Murder – MUST WATCH VIDEO!!!

Ritual Murder is not just a “Jewish” problem.  It is a Mormon problem, and a Roman Catholic “Problem” as well.

On July 19, 1990, a “General Authority” of the LDS “Mormon” Church named Glen Pace wrote a memo that he eventually leaked to the Utah Media concerning Satanic Ritual Abuse.  In this memo, Pace declared:

Of the sixty victims with whom I have met, fifty-three are female and seven are male. Eight are children. The abuse occurred in the following places: Utah (37), Idaho (3), California (4), Mexico (2), and other places (14). Fifty-three victims are currently living in the State of Utah. All sixty individuals are members of the Church. Forty-five victims allege witnessing and/or participating in human sacrifice. The majority were abused by relatives, often their parents. All have developed psychological problems and most have been diagnosed as having multiple personality disorder or some other form of dissociative disorder.

This full memo can be read in its entirety at:  http://mormontruth.blogspot.com/2006/01/glen-l-paces-memo-on-ritualistic-child.html

I’ll be totally honest here.  I received Pace’s memo in its entirety in 1994.   Investigating it fully is what led me to eventually leave the Mormon Church.  I uncovered that Mormonism = Zionism = Jewish Elitism and ultimately, RITUAL MURDER on a very large scale.   I know, this topic is very hard for most people to even begin to comprehend.   Yet, it is most certainly true.  It is NOT fiction or myth.

My thanks to Dr. Harrell Rhome, and the authors of the following videos.   WELL DONE, and VERY OBJECTIVE!!  (Keep in mind that the tool used by these Satanists in these human sacrifice is a very long and sharp “NAIL” — used to puncture the skin of the victim hundreds of times.  In Mormonism’s TEMPLE RITES — initiates are given the “Sign of the Nail” and the “Sure Sign of Nail” — or the “Nail in the Sure Place”.   In Hebrew Lexicon the symbol for NAIL is also the symbol for SIX.   Six, in turn, is the secret name for SATAN.   Get the picture??

Animal Sacrifice is clearly a precept and mainstay of the Khazarian “Jewish Religion”.    Is it just animals such as chickens and goats that are “sacrificed” in this obviously Satanic ritual, or do the Khazarian  “global elite” prefer human beings – especially children for their bloody sacrifices to Molech?

As the above video illustrates, the “Day of Atonement” – aka Yom Kippur involves offering a blood “sacrifice” to a being called Azazel.   Just who, (or what) is Azazel?  According to the Book of Enoch, Azazel is  one of the leaders of the rebellious “fallen angels” (demons) known as Watchers in the time preceding the flood; he taught men the art of warfare, of making swords, knives, shields, and coats of mail, and women the art of deception by ornamenting the body, dying the hair, and painting the face and the eyebrows, and also revealed to the people the secrets of witchcraft and corrupted their manners, leading them into wickedness and impurity!   And Horowitz and Kane call ME “Satanic”?   Please!!   Then the world clicks their collective tongues and wonder what possesses beings like Levi Aron to commit such horrific, demonic acts on innocent children.

As the bizarre story of Orthodox Jew Levi Aron and the dismemberment of 8-yr-old Leiby Kletzky continues to unfold, the public finally learns that there were THREE bloody carving knifes in Aron’s freezer, not just one.   Did Aron have two other accomplices in this macabre act?

GRISLY HARVEST

Young Leiby Kletzky was clearly loved and adored by his parents.  They made flyers and saturated the neighborhood until he was found.   Leiby was eventually found, but was located too late.    How many young children like Leiby have turned up missing, and have never been heard of again – much less found dismembered in a freezer and a suitcase in a dumpster?   The NUMBERS in the U.S. alone are shocking and staggering.

According to the “Child Abduction Resource Center’s website http://www.globalmissing.com/USAmissing.htm we learn:

To date two studies have been completed. The first National Incidence Studies of Missing, Abducted, Runaway, and Thrownaway Children (NISMART-1) was released in 1990, and the second, known as NISMART-2, was released in October 2002. According to NISMART-2 research, which studied the year 1999, an estimated 797,500 children were reported missing; 58,200 children were abducted by nonfamily members; 115 children were the victims of  long-term non-family abductions called “stereotypical kidnappings”; and 203,900 children were the victims of family abductions. A December 2004 NISMART bulletin (pdf)compares selected findings of NISMART-1 to NISMART-2.
Do the math, folks.   797,600 children were reported missing in 1999.   58,200 were abducted by nonfamily members, 115 were “kidnapped”, and 203,900 were the victims of “family abductions.”   That leaves 535,285 children completely unaccounted for during the calendar year 1999.
I know, this is extremely hard to fathom.   It is true, however.  Over a half million children each year are undoubtedly being victimized in some manner in this great country called America.   I personally do not believe that all 535,285 “throwaway” children in 1999 ended up dismembered in macabre Satanic rituals — at least I would hope and pray this is not the case.  However, I do suggest that there are indeed THOUSANDS, maybe TENS OF THOUSANDS, of innocent children that do indeed perish in this manner.  They are “throwaways” of society after all.  Orphans, or worse — infants who are unwanted and rejected.   This reality is not too hard to comprehend and understand when one contemplates that in a supposedly “Christian” nation, over 1.2 million ABORTIONS each and every year were lawfully performed, (over 53 million performed since the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision.)    If millions of abortions have been performed, why is it so hard to believe that thousands of nameless children have been ritually murdered?

One should also not forget the demonic activity of another Jew named Jeffrey Dahmer – who ritually murdered 17 other young men and boys in a similarly horrific manner as Levi Aron.   What exactly happened to Jewffrey Dahmer at age 6 causing him to become so mentally deranged as an adult?   The basic psychological profile of Dahmer is found at:

http://crime.about.com/od/serial/a/dahmer.htm

Dahmer Mugshot

Jeffrey Dahmer was responsible for a series of gruesome murders of 17 young men from 1988 until he was caught on July 22, 1991, in Milwaukee.

Dahmer’s Childhood Years

Dahmer was born on May 21, 1960, in Milwaukee, Wisconsin to Lionel and Joyce Dahmer. From all accounts Dahmer was a happy child who enjoyed typical toddler activities. It was not until the age of six, after undergoing hernia surgery, that his personality began to change from a jubilant social child to a loner who was uncommunicative and withdrawn. His facial expressions transformed from childhood smiles to a motionless blank stare, a look which remained with him throughout his life.

Pre-Teen Years

In 1966, the Dahmers moved to Bath, Ohio. Dahmer’s insecurities grew after the move and his shyness kept him from having many friends. While his peers were busy listening to the latest songs, Dahmer was busy collecting road kill and stripping the animal carcasses and saving the bones.

Other idle time was spent alone, buried deep inside his fantasies. His nonconfrontational attitude with his parents was considered an attribute yet in reality it was his apathy towards the real world that made him appear obedient.

Disturbing High School Years

Dahmer continued being a loner during his years at Revere High School. He had average grades, worked on the school newspaper and developed a bad drinking problem. His parents, possibly distracted from their own struggles, divorced when Jeff was almost 18. He remained living with his father who traveled a lot and was busy nurturing a relationship with his new wife.

After high school Dahmer enrolled at the Ohio State University and spent most of his time skipping classes and getting drunk. After two semesters he dropped out and returned home. His father issued him an ultimatum – get a job or join the Army. In 1979 he enlisted for six years into the Army, but his drinking continued and in 1981, after serving only two years, he was discharged because of his drunken behavior.

First Kill

Unknown to anyone, Jeffery Dahmer was mentally disintergrating. In June of 1988, he was struggling with his own homosexual desires, mixed with his need to act out his sadistic fantasies. Perhaps this struggle is what pushed him to pick up a hitchhiker, 19-year-old Steven Hicks. He invited Hicks to his father’s home and the two drank and engaged in sex, but when Hicks was ready to leave Dahmer bashed him in the head with a barbell and killed him.

He then cut up the body, placing the parts in garbage bags, which he buried in the woods surrounding his father’s property. Years later he returned and dug up the bags and crushed the bones and disbursed the remains around the woods. As insane as he had become, he had not lost site of the need to cover his murderous tracks. Later his explanation for killing Hicks was simply, he didn’t want him to leave.

Prison Time

Dahmer spent the next six years living with his grandmother in West Allis, Wisconsin. He continued drinking heavily and stayed in trouble with the police. In August 1982, he was arrested after exposing himself at a state fair. In September 1986, he was arrested and charged with public exposure after masturbating in public. He served 10 months in jail, but was arrested soon after his release after sexually fondling a 13-year-old boy in Milwaukee. He was given five-years probation after convincing the judge that he needed therapy.

His father, unable to understand what was happening to his son, continued to stand by him, making certain he had good legal councel. He also began to accept that there was little he could do to help the demons which seemed to rule Dahmer’s behavior. He realized that his son was missing a most basic human element – a conscience.

Murder Spree

In September 1987, while on probation on the molestation charges, Dahmer met 26-year-old Steven Toumi and the two spent the night drinking heavily and cruising gay bars, then went to a hotel room. When Dahmer awoke from his drunken stupor he found Toumi dead.

Dahmer put Toumi’s body into a suitcase which he took to his grandmother’s basement. There he discarded the body in the garbage after dismembering it, but not before gratifying his sexual necrophilia desires.

Passive Sex

Unlike most serial killers, who kill then move on to find another victim, Dahmer’s fantasies included a series of crimes against the corpse of his victims, or what he referred to as passive sex. This became part of his regular pattern and possibly the one obsession that pushed him to kill.

On His Own

Killing his victims in his grandmother’s basement was becoming increasingly difficult to hide. He was working as a mixer at Ambrosia Chocolate Factory and could afford a small apartment, so in September 1988, he got a one bedroom apartment on North 24th St. in Milwaukee.

Dahmer’s Ritual

Dahmer’s killing spree continued and for most of his victims the scene was the same. He would meet them at a gay bar or mall and entice them with free alcohol and money if they agreed to pose for photographs. Once alone, he would drug them, sometimes torture them and then kill them usually by strangulation. He would then masturbate over the corpse or have sex with the corpse, cut the body up and get rid of the remains. He also kept parts of the bodies including the skulls, which he would clean much like he did with his childhood road kill collection and often refrigerated organs which he would on occasion eat.

Known Victims

Name – Age – Date Murdered

  • Stephen Hicks – 18 – June, 1978
  • Steven Tuomi – 26 – September, 1987
  • Jamie Doxtator – 14 – October, 1987
  • Richard Guerrero – 25 – March, 1988
  • Anthony Sears – 24 – February, 1989
  • Eddie Smith – 36 – June, 1990
  • Ricky Beeks – 27 – July, 1990
  • Ernest Miller – 22 – September, 1990
  • David Thomas – 23 – September, 1990
  • Curtis Straughter – 16 – February, 1991
  • Errol Lindsey – 19 – April, 1991
  • Tony Hughes – 31 – May 24, 1991
  • Konerak Sinthasomphone – 14 – May 27, 1991
  • Matt Turner – 20 – June 30, 1991
  • Jeremiah Weinberger – 23 – July 5, 1991
  • Oliver Lacy – 23 – July 12, 1991
  • Joseph Bradeholt – 25 – July 19, 1991

Horowitz and Kane, by their own admission, have publicly declared that they have been actively soliciting the San Francisco FBI Office to “investigate” A. True Ott as a dangerous subversive, hate-mongering, anti-semitic, anti-government, murdering “domestic terrorist Satanist” with a large organization (The Hister) at his direction.

These most-serious charges filed in a FBI field office by these sadist liars are patently false, of course.    Just as patently false, tragically, as the bizarre case of patriot Juris Doctor Edgar Steele, who nevertheless is today rotting away in a prison cell for daring to be “stupid enough” to expose the Zionist cabal and to defend pro bono those who are accused of being Aryan Supremacists.

Steele, the clear victim of an organized FBI “Sting” (aka Investigation) with audiotaped “evidence” supposedly covertly taped by a clearly criminally corrupt FBI “undercover informant” was quite obviously manufactured via the latest audio-splicing voice technology (expert witnesses employed to expose this process was indeed used were not allowed by the judge to testify for the defense at trial).   It is very probable that similar damning, yet totally false evidence can likewise be manufactured if duly ordered by the filthy-rich, morally bankrupt Khazarian Tribal Chiefs at the so-called Anti-Defamation League.  These organized crime gangsters ala Meyer Lansky have no compunction in spending millions of dollars to bribe corrupt law enforcers in order to put away innocent people whose only “crime” is exercising their 1st Amendment rights.  Moreover, it would appear that the San Francisco FBI office is the ripest field for this endeavor.   HEGELIAN DIALECTIC IN ACTION ONCE AGAIN — Problem + Reaction = Prescribed Solution – in this case to SILENCE one of the innocent Lambs who just happens to have knowledge of the TRUTH and more importantly, is not afraid to bleat loud and long.

Supporting Evidence:

 

Mossad and the Jewish Problem

by Dr. William Pierce

For several years, I have been warning in these broadcasts about the growing infiltration and subversion of American law-enforcement agencies by Jewish pressure groups. This process, which has been going on at a significant rate for more than two decades, accelerated during the Clinton administration, especially after the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995, when Jewish groups put themselves forward as “experts on terrorism,” based on their experience in repressing Palestinians and on their undercover snooping into dissident groups in the United States. They offered training seminars to the FBI and other Federal police agencies, to various military units, and to state and local police agencies.

“We will show you how to recognize terrorists and potential terrorists and how to deal with them. We will tell you about these dangerous dissident organizations, these ‘hate’ groups, and we will help you to prevent another terrorist bombing, such as the one carried out by Timothy McVeigh in Oklahoma City,” the Jewish groups told the police and military agencies. The most visible of these groups was the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, but as we will see, there also were other, less visible Jewish groups at work.

Never mind that Timothy McVeigh had not belonged to any dissident group but had acted solely as an angry individual determined to send the government a message that its behavior in massacring the members of the Branch Davidian church in Waco, Texas, would not be tolerated. Never mind that the Anti-Defamation League and other Jewish groups offering their services really were pushing the military and law-enforcement agencies to shift their emphasis toward the investigation and repression of dissidents and the enforcement of a brand-new category of laws — so-called “hate crime” and “speech crime” laws — rather than toward the prevention of terrorism.

Never mind those things; it was the Clinton era, and Bill Clinton had brought more Jews into the government than any previous President. Jews were riding high in the Clinton administration, from Monica Lewinsky to Madaleine Albright. When the Jews wanted something, the Jews got it, and smart bureaucrats, including those in the military and law-enforcement agencies, knew better than to ask questions.

Bill Clinton’s extraordinary partiality to Jews lasted right up to the moment he left office, with a vastly disproportionate number of the last-minute pardons and commutations of sentences that he issued on January 20 last year going to Jewish criminals. The most notorious of these was the international Jewish super-swindler Marc Rich, who was able to persuade the head Jew in the Anti-Defamation League, Abe Foxman, to intercede with Clinton on his behalf.

All of this partiality has served Mr. Clinton well. In his first year after leaving office, he received $9.2 million in speaking fees, most of it from Jewish organizations. He received $400,000 last year from one Jewish organization alone, the Jewish National Fund, for three speeches. More than nine million dollars for some 70 speeches during the course of a year. Fascinating, isn’t it? You can find more information on Mr. Clinton’s career as a speaker to Jewish groups for huge fees in the June 18 issue of the New York Times, if you look carefully enough.

Well, that was Bill Clinton, a Democrat and a flamboyantly crooked lawyer from Arkansas who appealed to the lowest elements in the electorate and had a love affair with the Jewish mass media. Most voters hoped for more from George Bush and the Republicans. Unfortunately, what we’ve gotten is more of the same. In fact, Jewish infiltration and subversion of our military and law-enforcement agencies has proceeded even faster since Mr. Bush took office. Bush certainly doesn’t need the money from speaking fees, but he nevertheless has given virtual run of the government to Jews. Under Mr. Bush as under Mr. Clinton, what the Jews want the Jews get, and no one in the government has the courage or the integrity to challenge this situation.

We talked last week about the FBI turning loose 200 Israeli espionage agents that it arrested in the United States last year and about its refusal to arrest the anthrax terrorist, who killed five people and terrorized the whole country with his mailings of anthrax-infected letters. In the anthrax case, the FBI still is putting on a big show of trying to find the perpetrator. FBI spokesmen claim that more personnel and resources are allocated to catching the anthrax terrorist than to any other case except the 9/11 attack itself. I claim that this is all a fraud: that the FBI knows who the perpetrator is but has orders not to arrest him, because he is a Jew who carried out the anthrax mailings in an attempt to cast suspicion on Muslims and to generate public hostility against Israel’s enemies. If this became public knowledge, there would be a substantial drop in support among ordinary Americans for Israel and for Mr. Bush’s current war in the Middle East.

The big question is, why would the FBI go along with such a coverup? Even with orders directly from Attorney General John Ashcroft or from George Bush himself, any FBI official who went along with the coverup would be taking a huge risk. Why do that for the sake of Israel? Who would protect the FBI people involved if the coverup got blown? The “partnership” between the Anti-Defamation League and the FBI that both ADL National Director Abe Foxman and FBI Director Robert Mueller have been bragging about doesn’t seem enough to account for such a flagrant dereliction of duty on the part of the FBI. Surely, someone in the FBI would blow the whistle.

Actually, someone has blown the whistle, but you’d hardly know it from reading the news. Of course, there’s been much coverage of one recent FBI whistle-blower, Coleen Rowley, a special agent in the FBI’s Minneapolis field office, in connection with FBI officials ignoring reports she sent to Washington headquarters last August — that was before the September 11 attack — about a suspected terrorist, Zacarias Moussaoui, who was attempting to learn to fly 747 jets. But there’s been very little coverage of another FBI whistle-blower, Sibel Edmonds, and the coverage of her far more alarming revelations has been quite cryptic, to say the least.

There was a story in the Washington Post ten days ago, on June 19, about several FBI whistle-blowers, one of whom was Sibel Edmonds, who worked as a translator of wiretapped messages in the FBI’s Washington, DC, office. Despite her name, Edmonds is, in fact, a Jewess. But she is a rare Jewess, without a very strong sense of loyalty to her tribe. Indeed, an alarmingly high percentage of the FBI’s wiretap translators are Jews, and nearly all of them who translate Middle Eastern languages are Jews. Most of these have a much stronger sense of their Jewishness than does Edmonds, as Edmonds found out when they tried to recruit her into the Mossad, Israel’s super-secret agency for espionage, terror, and assassination.

The Washington Post story relates her account of the recruitment attempts in cryptic language that clearly is intended to avoid mentioning the words “Jew,” “Israel,” or “Mossad,” lest our gallant, little democratic ally in the Middle East or its partisans in this country be cast in a bad light. I’ll now read to you the relevant portions of that June 19 story in the Washington Post:

 

That whistle-blower, Sibel Edmonds, 32, a former wiretap translator in the Washington field office, raised suspicions about a co-worker’s connections to a group under surveillance. Under pressure, FBI officials have investigated and verified the veracity of parts of Edmonds’ story, according to documents and people familiar with an FBI briefing of congressional staff…. The FBI confirmed that Edmonds’ co-worker had been part of an organization that was a target of top-secret surveillance and that the same co-worker had “unreported contacts” with a foreign government official subject to the surveillance….The FBI said it was unable to corroborate an allegation by Edmonds that she was approached to join the targeted group. Edmonds said she told Dennis Saccher, a special agent in the Washington field office who was conducting the surveillance, about the co-worker’s actions and Saccher replied, “It looks like espionage to me.” Saccher declined to comment when contacted by a reporter.

Edmonds was fired in March after she reported her concerns. Government officials said the FBI fired her because her “disruptiveness” hurt her on-the-job “performance.” Edmonds says she believes she was fired in retaliation for reporting on her co-worker.

Edmonds began working at the FBI in late September [of last year]. In an interview she said she became particularly alarmed when she discovered that a recently hired FBI translator was saying that she belonged to the Middle Eastern organization whose taped conversations she had been translating for FBI counterintelligence agents. Officials asked that the name of the target group not be revealed for national security reasons….

Edmonds said that on several occasions the translator tried to recruit her to join the targeted foreign group. “This person told us she worked for our target organization,” Edmonds said in an interview. “These are the people we are targeting, monitoring.”

Edmonds would not identify the other translator, but the Post has learned from other sources that she is a 33-year-old U.S. citizen whose native country is home to the target group. Both Edmonds and the other translator are U.S. citizens who trace their ethnicity to the same Middle Eastern country. Reached by telephone last week, the woman, who works under contract for the FBI’s Washington field office, declined to comment.

In December, Edmonds said the woman and her husband, a U.S. military officer, suggested during a hastily arranged visit to Edmonds’ Northern Virginia home on a Sunday morning that Edmonds join the group. ‘Are you a member of the particular organization?,’ Edmonds recalled the woman’s husband saying. ‘It’s a very good place to be a member. There are a lot of advantages of being with this organization and doing things together’ — this is our targeted organization — ‘and one of the greatest things about it is you can have an early, an unexpected, early retirement. And you will be totally set if you go to that specific country.’

Edmonds also said the woman’s husband told her she would be admitted to the group, especially if she said she worked for the FBI. Later, Edmonds said, the woman approached her with a list dividing up individuals whose phone lines were being secretly tapped: Under the plan the woman would translate conversations of her former co-workers in the target organization, and Edmonds would handle other phone calls. Edmonds said she refused and that the woman told her that her lack of cooperation could put her family in danger.

Edmonds said she also brought her concerns to her supervisor and other FBI officials in the Washington field office. When no action was taken, she said, she reported her concerns to the FBI’s Office of Professional Responsibility, then to Justice’s inspector general.

“Investigations are being compromised,” Edmonds wrote to the inspector general’s office in March. “Incorrect or misleading translations are being sent to agents in the field. Translations are being blocked and circumvented.”

Government officials familiar with the matter who asked not to be identified said that both Edmonds and the woman were given polygraph examinations by the FBI and that both passed.

I’m sorry that the cryptic language made that report more difficult to understand than it otherwise would have been: a certain unnamed “Middle Eastern country,” an unnamed co-worker of Sibel Edmonds who is a native of that unnamed Middle Eastern country, an unnamed “target organization” in that unnamed Middle Eastern country, and so on. The Washington Post tells us that the cryptic language is necessary “for national security reasons.” That’s certainly a phony excuse. Do you really believe that the folks in the Israeli Embassy reading this article can’t figure out who is being talked about? The real reason for not mentioning names is not to keep the Mossad from finding out that they’re being investigated; it’s to keep any Sally Soccermoms or Joe Sixpacks who might stumble across the story on their way to the comic strips or the sports pages from getting a clue as to who’s really calling the shots at the FBI these days.

Let me just run over the scenario again. After the Oklahoma City bombing, during a time when the FBI was being criticized for letting the bombing happen, Jewish groups promoted themselves as “experts” on terrorism and offered to train FBI agents and other law-enforcement and military personnel. One of these Jewish groups was the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, a group heavily involved in illegal activity and with longstanding ties to Jewish organized crime figures, such as international super-swindler Marc Rich and Las Vegas gangster Moe Dalitz. Another of these Jewish groups was Israel’s espionage and terror organization, Mossad, which specializes in the assassination of Israel’s enemies in other countries, using letter bombs, car bombs, exotic poisons, and trained hit-men armed with silencer-equipped submachine guns.

The impropriety of FBI involvement with either of these Jewish organizations should have been obvious, but in the Clinton era, no bureaucrat in Washington dared say anything critical of Jews or Israel. George Bush has a different style, but no more scruples than Bill Clinton. By the time he became President, the corruption had proceeded so far that it was easy for him to decide to join it instead of trying to lick it. And early in his administration another major terrorist event — that of September 11 — gave Jewish groups another rationale for strengthening their “partnership” with U.S. law-enforcement agencies. With Anti-Defamation League agents working on the outside and redefining the types of criminal activity with which the FBI should concern itself, and Mossad agents working inside and preempting for themselves all investigations of interest to Israel, including all investigations of Israeli espionage, it is no wonder that the FBI’s efficiency, morale, and prestige have plummeted, and things that would have been unthinkable a decade ago — such as refusing to prosecute the members of the largest espionage ring ever broken up in the United States and engaging in an internal coverup of the anthrax terrorism case — could occur.

This is a depressing situation — and as I have warned repeatedly, an extremely dangerous situation. We are in grave danger of losing all of our remaining liberty and soon thereafter becoming extinct as a people, as a race. There certainly is no hope at all of rectifying this situation from the top, through the elected politicians and the top bureaucrats. Did you hear George Bush make his pronouncement on Monday about the conflict between the Jews and the Palestinians? Yasser Arafat, the elected leader of the Palestinians, must go because he has been “tainted by terrorism.” Anyone who, like Arafat, has condoned terrorism is unacceptable as a negotiating partner for the Israelis and must be replaced by someone who has clean hands. Really! I can imagine all of the Jewish leaders, including that “man of peace,” as Bush calls him, Ariel Sharon, rolling on the floor with laughter during Bush’s statement. I would not be surprised if it were Sharon himself, the Butcher of Beirut, the mass murderer of Palestinian women and children, the preeminent terrorist and war criminal in the Middle East, who wrote that statement for Bush.

George Bush is a man utterly without honor, without principles, without a shred of genuine patriotism or racial loyalty. As long as the Jewish media continue to give him good press, he is perfectly content to be Ariel Sharon’s step’n’fetchit and to say and do whatever he is told to say and do. Underneath Bush is Attorney General John Ashcroft, a nutcase religious fanatic whose historical role model is Tomas de Torquemada and who believes that the Jews can do no wrong because that’s what it says in the Bible. And then there is FBI Director Robert Mueller, a pitiful specimen of an unprincipled career bureaucrat indeed, a man who is completely unperturbed by the ongoing Jewish subversion and takeover of the FBI.

Our one basis for hope is the fact that the takeover is not yet complete. If it were complete, there would be no debate, no investigation by some FBI agents of the Mossad, no newspaper articles with cryptic language like the one I read to you from the Washington Post. The fact is there are many FBI special agents who are not happy about what is being done to the FBI. And there are hundreds of thousands of perceptive and intelligent White Americans who also are not happy. Unfortunately, very few of these people have the courage to do or even say anything about what is happening.

And there is one other factor besides a lack of courage, although it is a related factor, and that is the inability to address our problem in a truly fundamental way, a truly radical way. There are many patriotic Americans who would be alarmed to learn that a foreign espionage organization, the Mossad, has infiltrated the FBI and is able to subvert the FBI’s operations, but there are fewer patriotic Americans willing and able to draw the necessary conclusions about the overall role of Jews in America. They see the problem as simply a problem with the Mossad. They resist tying the Mossad problem to the Anti-Defamation League problem and to the problem of Jewish influence in the government generally. They resist seeing the connection between the problem of Jewish influence in the government and Jewish influence in the mass media of news and entertainment.

They resist seeing these things because to see them, to examine them, to think about them and draw conclusions from them, is to become anti-Jewish, anti-Semitic. And they have been so strongly conditioned against that for so long that they simply can’t deal with it. Many who are brave enough and honest enough to speak out about a Mossad problem cannot even think about the much larger Jewish problem of which the Mossad problem is only a relatively small part. And as long as we refuse to think about the problem, as long as we are afraid to think about it, we cannot hope to solve it.

And really, we’d better begin thinking about this problem very soon. Time is running out for America and for our people.

http://www.natvan.com/free-speech/fs0208b.html

The FBI: Going Rogue

By John W. Whitehead
2/14/2011

“The minute the FBI begins making recommendations on what should be done with its information, it becomes a Gestapo.”–J. Edgar Hoover

The history of the FBI is the history of how America–once a nation that abided by the rule of law and held the government accountable for its actions–has steadily devolved into a police state where laws are unidirectional, intended as a tool for government to control the people and rarely the other way around.

The FBI (then named simply Bureau of Investigation) was established in 1908 by President Theodore Roosevelt and Attorney General Charles Bonaparte as a small task force assigned to deal with specific domestic crimes, its first being to survey houses of prostitution in anticipation of enforcing the White Slave Traffic Act. Initially quite limited in its abilities to investigate so-called domestic crimes, the FBI slowly expanded in size, scope and authority over the course of the 20th century.

During World War I, the FBI was tasked with investigating “enemy aliens,” which included anarchists and communists. During World War II, the FBI investigated various radical elements in society, as well as draft evaders and foreign nationals from belligerent nations. The agency also helped enforce the government’s nefarious policy of Japanese internment following the Pearl Harbor attack. In both 1939 and 1943, the FBI received presidential directives to investigate threats to national security. To that end, during the infamous McCarthy era, the FBI became heavily involved in the government’s efforts to expose Americans with ties to communism, conducting surveillance, pressuring employers to hire or fire particular individuals, and feeding information to the media to influence public opinion. By the end of the Korean War, what had once been a small task force of a few dozen agents became an investigative force of 6,200 agents.

Yet it was during the social and political upheaval of the 1960s that the FBI’s transformation into a federal policing and surveillance agency really began, one aimed not so much at the criminal element but at those who challenged the status quo–namely, those expressing anti-government sentiments. According to J. Edgar Hoover, the FBI’s first and most infamous director, “the United States was confronted with ‘a new style in conspiracy–conspiracy that is extremely subtle and devious and hence difficult to understand…a conspiracy reflected by questionable moods and attitudes, by unrestrained individualism, by nonconformism in dress and speech, even by obscene language, rather than by formal membership in specific organizations.’”

Among those most closely watched by the FBI during that time period was Martin Luther King Jr., a man labeled by the agency as the “most dangerous and effective Negro leader in the country.” With wiretaps and electronic bugs planted in his home and office, King was kept under constant surveillance by the FBI from 1958 until his death in 1968, all with the aim of “neutralizing King as an effective Negro leader.” King even received letters written by government agents suggesting that either he commit suicide or the details of his private life would be revealed to the public. The FBI file on King, whom the agency suspected of communism but failed to prove, is estimated to contain 17,000 pages of materials documenting his day-to-day activities. Incredibly, even 40 years later, the FBI maintains a stranglehold on information relating to this “covert” operation: per a court order, information relating to the FBI wiretaps on King will not be released until 2027.

John Lennon was another such activist targeted for surveillance by the FBI. Fearing Lennon might incite anti-war violence, the Nixon administration directed the FBI to keep close tabs on the ex-Beatle, resulting in close to 400 pages of files on his activities during the early ‘70s. But the government’s actions didn’t stop with mere surveillance. The agency went so far as to attempt to have Lennon deported on drug charges. As professor Jon Wiener, a historian who sued the federal government to have the files on Lennon made public, observed, “This is really the story of F.B.I. misconduct, of the President using the F.B.I. to get his enemies, to use federal agencies to suppress dissent and to silence critics.”

Unfortunately, not even the creation of the Intelligence Oversight Board (IOB) by President Ford in 1976 could keep the FBI’s surveillance activities within the bounds of the law. Whether or not those boundaries were respected in the ensuing years, they all but disappeared in the wake of the 9/11 attacks. This was true, especially with the passage of the USA Patriot Act, which gave the FBI and other intelligence agencies carte blanche authority in investigating Americans suspected of being anti-government. While the FBI’s powers were being strengthened, President George W. Bush dismantled the oversight capabilities of the IOB, which was entrusted with keeping the FBI in check.

Even the Obama administration, a vocal critic of the Bush policies, has failed to restore these checks and balances on the FBI. Indeed, the Obama administration has gone so far as to insist that the FBI can obtain telephone records of international calls made from the U.S. without any formal legal process or court oversight. This rationale obviously applies to emails, as well.

Little wonder, then, that FBI abuses keep mounting. Most recently, a report by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) reveals that since 9/11, the FBI has been responsible for at least 40,000 violations of the law. Most of the violations are of “internal oversight guidelines,” while close to one-third were “abuse of National Security Letters,” and almost one-fifth are “violations of the Constitution, FISA, and other legal authorities.” Specific violations include “failure to submit notification of the investigation of a US person to FBI Headquarters for three years… failure to report a violation within 14 days of its discovery [and] continuing to investigate a US person when the authority to do so had expired.”

The FBI’s abuse of National Security Letters (NSL) has been brought to light by both the EFF as well as Justice Department investigations. NSLs were created in the 1970s for espionage and terrorism investigations. In effect, NSLs allow the FBI to bypass the Fourth Amendment’s requirement of a court-sanctioned search warrant in seeking information by allowing an agent to demand information on his or her mere say-so. They were originally intended as narrow exceptions in consumer privacy law, enabling the FBI to review in secret the customer records of suspected foreign agents. However, they have since been used for clandestine scrutiny of American citizens, U.S. residents and visitors who are not alleged to be terrorists or spies. As Barton Gellman noted in a 2005 piece in The Washington Post, “The FBI now issues more than 30,000 national security letters a year, a hundredfold increase over historic norms. The letters–one of which can be used to sweep up the records of many people–are extending the bureau’s reach as never before into the telephone calls, correspondence and financial lives of ordinary Americans.” It has since been revealed that the FBI issued more than 140,000 national security letters between 2003 and 2005, many involving people with no obvious connections to terrorism.

In many cases, many of those now under surveillance by the FBI are ordinary American citizens doing nothing more than exercising their First Amendment right to free speech by criticizing the government. Moreover, according to a previously classified document, the FBI conducted clandestine surveillance on some U.S. residents for as long as 18 months at a time without a search warrant, proper paperwork or oversight. The FBI has also continued to carry out surveillance on groups involved in various protest activities–mainly peace activities. For example, a case of mass raids by FBI agents against peace activists occurred in late 2010. On September 24, the homes of five peace activists in the Minneapolis area were raided by FBI agents at around seven in the morning. The agents filtered through all of the possessions in the activists’ homes and seized electronic devices such as computers and cell phones as well as other documents. Ostensibly, the mission was undertaken in order to investigate possible ties to foreign terrorist groups, but immediate evidence of such a connection was lacking. The activists targeted have been members in the antiwar and labor communities for many years.

Today, the FBI employs more than 35,000 individuals and operates more than 56 field offices in major cities across the U.S., as well as 400 resident agencies in smaller towns, and more than 50 international offices. In addition to their “data campus,” which houses more than 96 million sets of fingerprints from across the United States and elsewhere, the FBI is also, according to The Washington Post, “building a vast repository controlled by people who work in a top-secret vault on the fourth floor of the J. Edgar Hoover FBI Building in Washington. This one stores the profiles of tens of thousands of Americans and legal residents who are not accused of any crime. What they have done is appear to be acting suspiciously to a town sheriff, a traffic cop or even a neighbor.”

The agency’s reach is more invasive than ever, thanks to nearly unlimited resources (its minimum budget alone in fiscal year 2010 was $7.9 billion), the government’s vast arsenal of technology, the interconnectedness of government intelligence agencies, and information sharing through fusion centers–data collecting intelligence agencies spread throughout the country that constantly monitor communications (including those of American citizens), everything from internet activity and web searches to text messages, phone calls and emails. What’s more, you can be sure that the reauthorization of the Patriot Act by Congress will only further legitimize the FBI’s efforts to spy on American citizens, thereby destroying whatever shred of privacy remains.

So where does this leave us?

Martin Luther King Jr. was one of the first to recognize that as a nation we seem to have significantly passed from a nation of laws to a nation of men. Whereas the United States Constitution was once the rule of law, guarding our freedoms and shielding us from government abuses, we have entered a phase in our nation’s life where the government largely operates above the law. The activities of the FBI are a perfect illustration of this.

Yet we would do well to remember that governments primarily exist to secure rights. This idea is central to constitutionalism, which serves to limit governmental power and ensure that the government performs its basic function: preserve and protect our rights, especially our unalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and our civil liberties. Otherwise, we are destined to live in a police state.

http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/commentary.asp?record_id=698