I first reported on this immediately after the CDC issued its report. Now others are also writing on this topic. GREAT NEWS!!!
A. True Ott, PhD
By Dr. Stephen C. L’Hommedieu
August 17, 2011
CDC Creating a “Zombie Horror” Consciousness
“How do I prepare for a zombie apocalypse?” Supposedly, this was the question raised by the general public that motivated the CDC into action with the release of “Preparedness 101: Zombie Apocalypse.”  It’s a ridiculous question by most standards, but apparently not for the CDC. That’s because the CDC’s “Zombie Apocalypse” is targeting a younger audience to accomplish a number of important objectives. This includes planting the seeds of “zombie horror” consciousness.
An important feature of this state of consciousness is how negative psychological elements of zombie horror imagery and its fictional life-threatening situations can be recalled within the context of an actual emergency to impact your perceptions. The objective would be to exploit the fear factor in hope that many of you adopt a similar model of zombie-terrorized behavior. This facilitates the impact of media hype to influence your judgment under emergency circumstances, reminiscent of the H1N1 swine flu “pandemic.”
Ultimately, the silent persuasion of zombie horror is intended to induce similar perceptions of hopelessness and despair. In other words, false perceptions could move you to accept that you’re without any good choice. In your mind, to survive a zombie apocalypse, you would feel compelled to do things that may oppose your moral and ethical standards and beliefs, violate your personal and constitutional rights, or possibly cause undue harm to you and your family.
The Meaning of CDC Technical Assistance and Investigation Goals
Following Dr. Kahn’s list of good emergency recommendations we find the CDC “technical assistance” provisions. This is presented in a non-threatening form of standard medical emergency procedures. But if it were applied with unprincipled intent, which has become a standard practice with vaccine initiatives, it could easily serve as a license for abuse. Think of it as a future medical version of the “Patriot” Act. Consider how there is room for some elaboration to the meaning of these terms. This should serve as a warning to prepare you for the magnitude of government intervention that could be unleashed during the next emergency.
Patient Management and Care: Under emergency circumstances you will most likely have little authority, if any, to utilize the health care of your choice. You may find yourself having to accept the “choice” of being vaccinated against your will to protect public health. Supposing a vaccine mandate was forced upon the public, and you were to refuse, you could expect some form of forceful intimidation, confinement, restrictions and/or significant penalties.
Tracking Contacts: This could also mean S.W.A.T. or other armed law enforcement may be given authority to seek you out and illegally enter your home or facility without your permission or a warrant. You could then be seized and subject to “infection control” should you display any suspicious signs or symptoms associated with an infectious agent, such as nausea, tremors, sweating, shortness of breath, or contentious behavior, although similar symptoms could be provoked when held at gunpoint.
The meaning of “Tracking contacts” can also encompass other applications when coupled with unprincipled intent. This system of surveillance could just as well be used to track down vaccine oppositionists for violating vaccine mandates in the future. If the thought of being held at gunpoint to be vaccinated is difficult to conceive, consider the 131 children in Nsanje who fled to Mozambique to escape the measles vaccine. They were eventually tracked down by medics under a police escort and forcibly vaccinated at gunpoint.  You may think this couldn’t happen here in the U.S., but think again. If the CDC, HHS (U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services) and others have their way, this practice could be on its way to a neighborhood near you. Remember that even the Department of Education now employs aggressive and violent S.W.A.T. teams to arrest those suspected of student loan offenses.
Infection Control/Isolation and Quarantine: Mike Adams, The Health Ranger, provided the details in his article: “’Infection Control’ means [arresting] infected people at gunpoint and moving them into ‘infection zones’ where everybody and anyone who tries to flee is shot. That’s how a quarantine actually works, in case you didn’t know. Ask the CDC yourself if you don’t believe me.”  Isolation and quarantine are where the “zombies” (those who refuse vaccinations) will be confined.
Then there’s a brief description of the CDC “investigation goals.” Of particular interest is where it describes how such an investigation would seek to, “determine the cause of the illness, the source of the infection/virus/toxin…prevent further cases, and how patients can best be treated.”
This would be impressive if only CDC “investigation goals” weren’t selectively compromised. For example, there’s the CDC’s extraordinary failure to effectively investigate a primary cause behind the sky-rocketing autism emergency – an excessive and toxic vaccine schedule!  Unfortunately, this problem is inherent with its design. CDC goals must always align with the financial interests of the pharmaceutical industry and government and global objectives.
Dr. Julie Gerberding, the past CDC Director and, not by coincidence, now President of Merck’s global vaccine division, was interviewed by Dr. Sanjay Gupta, chief medical correspondent for CNN. The program was to “clarify” the issue of whether vaccines could cause autism, and more specifically to address the Hannah Poling vaccine injury case. Watch here to hear the evasive responses to pertinent, autism-defining questions. As the CDC director at that time, Dr. Gerberding clearly illustrates how seriously the CDC would address any emergency that threatens the lifeblood of the vaccine industry.
Fear-Based Measles Incrimination Reinforces CDC Misinformation
Within the article’s fear-based zombie background information, it conspicuously categorizes the measles virus within the context of gruesome and extremely deadly “mutations of existing conditions.” Included among such life threatening conditions as mad-cow disease and rabies (or zombies chomping on your head), its only relevance is through fictional applications used in horror movies to produce zombies. Incriminated through its “celebrity” status, it’s a subtle method for presenting measles as viciously deadly.
There was a period in our history when the measles virus was a cause for concern. In “Mortality in the United States, 1900-1950,” Tavia Gordon explains: “Mortality for the communicable diseases of childhood fell sharply between 1900 and 1950 [largely due to improved hygiene, nutrition and medical care],” and, “In 1900, this group of diseases [diphtheria, pertussis, measles and scarlet fever] was responsible for 242.6 deaths per 100,000 children under 15. In 1950, these diseases together caused fewer than 5 deaths for every 100,000 children.” Although Gordon attributes these decreases to a number of factors, including inoculations, the measles vaccine was not licensed until 1963. Thus, the dramatic decrease in childhood measles fatalities was unrelated to measles vaccination.
After decades of measles vaccine intervention, this once common childhood disease is now on the rise again. The CDC claims the reason for measles resurgence is because, “90% of those infected had not been vaccinated, or their vaccination status was unknown.” Many have been deceived into believing this to be fact. However, there’s no shortage of opposing evidence to expose this underhanded claim as yet another CDC tale from the crypts.
One important issue the CDC conveniently overlooks is that the MMR vaccine, as with most other vaccines, can only provide some varying degree of temporary “immunity” at best, and it’s without any guarantee it will work at all. There have been documented failures of the monovalent  and the MMR  measles vaccines of up to 90%. In addition, reported outbreaks of mumps (MMR vaccine)  and whooping cough (DTaP vaccine)  have also included high percentages of individuals who were previously vaccinated.
Then there’s the failure of vaccinated mothers to pass down sufficient measles antibodies to protect their children. William Atkinson, MD, MPH, a medical epidemiologist for the CDC responsible for measles surveillance and outbreak investigations until 1995, briefly commented in an article by Daniel Q. Haney of the Associated Press. Published in the December 27, 1992 issue of the “Los Angeles Times,” Dr. Atkinson acknowledged the consequence of decreased measles antibody production in mothers previously vaccinated, which he claimed to be, “An extremely interesting phenomenon, and one of great concern.”  Mr. Haney concluded his article with this statement: “Like a natural measles infection, the vaccine triggers production of measles antibodies. However, the amounts are lower. So vaccinated mothers have fewer antibodies to pass to their babies than do those who actually caught the measles and suffered through the disease.”
Ten years later, Sandy Mintz (now Sandy Gottstein), publisher and editor of “Vaccination News,” revealed an interesting fact that in 2002, “the U.S. measles death rate used to be far lower prior to vaccination.”  Mintz presented additional statistics: In “1976 three percent of measles cases occurred in children less than one, today [September 2002] more than 25% do.” What does this point to? It points to the same conclusion made by Dr. Atkinson of the CDC – vaccinated mothers pass less immunity on to their babies.
The resurgence of measles should be of no surprise to the CDC. This is another tragic vaccine-induced epidemic in the making that was apparent 20 years ago! Even worse, the CDC continues to justify injuring children with the MMR vaccine., 
There are other serious problems connected with the MMR vaccine. F. Edward Yazbak, MD, FAAP, presents an account of the history and statistics behind this vaccine in “Regressive Autism and MMR Vaccination.” Dr. Yazbak explains the initial efficacy of the first monovalent measles vaccine, the “short and inadequate” testing of the MMR vaccine, the methods used to force pediatricians to endorse the MMR vaccine, the facts behind Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s research and the politically motivated dismantling of his research and career, the increase in the U.S. vaccine schedule, the immune system overload to children receiving vaccinations for multiple diseases simultaneously, and the tragic vaccine-induced epidemic that followed – an explosion of autism.
Shades of the H1N1 Swine Flu “Pandemic”
There are other troubling elements to this scenario of emergency preparedness coming out of the CDC. The inclusion of bizarre zombie graphics is all too reminiscent of similar scare tactics used for the H1N1 swine flu pandemic scam. For over a year before the H1N1 swine flu virus was officially declared, mainstream media inundated the public with the photograph of a make-shift hospital scene from the 1918 flu epidemic. Apparently, it wasn’t convincing enough to motivate the public into vaccine compliance. To turn up the fear factor the CDC has called out the zombies, but also with a backup of other entertaining methods of sci-fi persuasion soon to come.
As if zombies coming directly out of the CDC weren’t bad enough, keep in mind the CDC also operates under the guise of film “entertainment.” In a continuing effort to saturate your mind with images of viral pandemic horrors, a few of Hollywood’s finest were called to portray an updated bird flu version. The future release of “Contagion”  comes just in time to wreak psychological pandemonium on audiences before the next flu season strikes. The film offers this line by accomplished actor Laurence Fishburne from the trailer of terror that the CDC is hoping you will ingrain in your brain: “Someone doesn’t have to weaponize the bird flu, the birds are doing that.” Sure. And someone doesn’t have to terrorize you to vaccinate for the flu, the CDC is doing that!
Without a doubt, the plague of propaganda will be the only real “contagion” in this movie.
What Will Be Next?
Given all of the CDC fanfare of zombie horror, sci-fi flu pandemics and measles resurgence, it should be obvious the CDC has a preference for fear-based propaganda to motivate you toward complete vaccine compliance. But propaganda often indicates some event will soon follow. Considering the CDC and related government entities are directed by pharmaceutical and global interests, we can only speculate about future “emergency” events to come in effort to provoke vaccine mandates. This raises a serious concern: To what extent will these entities immorally and subversively operate to accomplish their vaccine compliance objectives?
Could an epidemic be initiated through the “accidental” contamination of vaccine materials containing live viruses, such as the alleged “mistake” by the major global pharmaceutical company Baxter International Inc.? Could a covert operation equivalent to the ATF’s “Operation Fast and Furious” be employed to demonize the unvaccinated as the cause of disease resurgence to effectively mandate vaccines once and for all? Tragically, these and many other unconscionable scenarios are not products of an active or wild imagination.
Aside from the zombie apocalypse emergencies included in the CDC’s presentation, there’s an interesting timing of the article to support reason to suspect it’s also serving to “prepare” you for a different scenario.
For starters, it’s interesting to point out that Dr. Kahn is experienced in “bioterrorism, global health and emerging infectious diseases.” Dr. Kahn’s expertise sends a disturbing message in light of the CDC “showcasing” his article.
Curiously absent among the zombie apocalypse-style emergencies, truly worthy of this title, was any reference to a biological threat. This could include an accidental release of some biological contaminant or an act of bioterrorism. One could only speculate for the reason, but it’s possible the exclusion may not have been accidental. There’s the probability that if the article included a reference to preparing for bioterrorism, and the upcoming zombie apocalypse involves an act of bioterrorism, it could create an uncomfortable link to government involvement. The omission may have been to avoid any parallel to the highly organized, government-backed global effort that began with media hype to brace for a possible flu pandemic and eventually led to the engineering of the H1N1 swine flu pandemic scheme.
Approximately two weeks prior to the release of “Zombie Apocalypse” we experienced an interesting manipulation of political events in the so-called “War on Terror.” Osama bin Laden was allegedly terminated. Interestingly, rather than resounding bells of freedom, we heard alarms warning of new acts of terrorism in retaliation with talk of possible biological weapons. Was this a totally unexpected outcome or is this a part of another fear-based equation with an element of bioterrorism?
One week after Osama’s official death, Marti Oakley’s article, “Anthrax Vaccine: Children Targeted for Testing,” reported more news on the biological front that immediately followed the Osama assault: “On May 2, 2011, Department of Health and Human Services announced it will buy 3.42 million doses of Bio-thrax a vaccine developed by the military to counter its weaponized anthrax that it also developed.” Even worse, the HHS is planning to test this stock pile of useless and deadly anthrax vaccine on children. My question is the same as Oakley’s: is there more to this than just unethical financial motives?
Simulated training exercises have already been under way for some time to prepare for this possible bioterrorist event. A recent article by Shepard Ambellas and Alex Thomas made mention of such activities that occurred in the Chicago area last year. “What Do the Sears Tower, WTC, and Terror Drills Have In Common?” reports previous news relating to the full scale terror drill event that included, “a simulated airplane crash, terror attack, and the release of a bio weapon.”
The CDC’s Take Home Message
What’s the CDC hoping you will get out of “Zombie Apocalypse?” Putting aside the pretense of clever marketing slogans such as, “Never Fear – CDC is Ready,” the principle objective is exactly the opposite: to instill as much fear in you as ethically possible. If it wasn’t, they wouldn’t have published this nonsense in the first place. For the public to choose boldness over fear is exactly what the CDC doesn’t want because it diminishes the power and control of government intervention.
The Zombie Apocalypse” isn’t simply about preparing you for the next emergency. It’s preparing your mind to access perceptions of fear and despair to encourage a submissive response. With the next national or global emergency, the real meaning of the CDC’s “Zombie Apocalypse” will become apparent as new efforts will be made to force us to accept further government interventions, more loss of freedom, and more dangerous vaccines.
“If people let the government decide what foods and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny.” -Thomas Jefferson
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Emergency Preparedness and Response. “Social Media: Preparedness 101: Zombie Apocalypse,” by Ali S. Khan, MD, MPH, May 16, 2011.
2. “131 Children Vaccinated at Gunpoint in Nsanje,” by Mike Langa-Lulanga. Malawi Voice, July 17, 2011.
3. “CDC Warns Americans to Prepare for Zombie Apocalypse (Really),” by Mike Adams. Natural News, May 19, 2011.
4. “A Positive Association Found Between Autism Prevalence and Childhood Vaccination Uptake Across the U.S. Population.” Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, Volume 74, Issue 14, 2011.
5. “You Tube: CDC Director Admits Vaccines Trigger Autism,” by Diane Vigil, April 23, 2008. Originally presented on CNN, March 29, 2008; “Unraveling the Mystery of Autism.”
6. “Mortality in the United States, 1900-1950,” by Tavia Gordon. Vol. 68, No. 4, April 1953, pp. 441-444.
7. “Regressive Autism and MMR Vaccination,” by F. Edward Yazbak, MD, FAAP. Vaccination News, 2011.
8. “Measles Outbreak In Previously Immunized Children, Florida, US,” posted on Vaccines.Me. Excerpt from “Measles (Rubeola) in Previously Immunized Children.” Pediatrics Vol. 46, No. 3 September 1970, pp. 397-402.
9. “High Secondary Vaccine Failure Amongst Teenagers Vaccinated For Measles At Young Age,” posted on Vaccines.Me. Excerpt from “Secondary measles vaccine failures identified by measurement of IgG avidity: high occurrence among teenagers vaccinated at young age.” Epidemiol Infect 2000 April, 124(2): 263-71.
10. “Mumps Outbreaks Among The Unvaccinated,” by Teresa Conrick. Age of Autism, January 10, 2010.
11. “Whooping Cough (Pertussis) In The Fully Vaccinated,” posted on Vaccines.Me. Excerpt from “Whooping Cough Vaccine Not As Powerful As Thought,” by Alison Young. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, March 22, 2009.
12. “Vaccinated Girls Grow Up, Their Babies Face Higher Risk for Measles,” by Daniel Q. Haney, Associated Press. Los Angeles Times, December 27, 1992.
13. “Measles in Vaccination Age: Is It Now deadlier?” by Sandy Mintz (Sandy Gottstein). Vaccination News, September 13, 2002.
14. “New Study Shows Vaccines Cause Brain Changes Found in Autism,” by Dan Olmsted and Mark Blaxill. Age of Autism, July 15, 2010.
15. “Murdoch’s Media Malpractice and the Genetic Altering of Human Beings through DNA Vaccines,” by Ethan E. Huff, staff writer. Natural News.com, July 20, 2011.
16. “Contagion” (2011) Official Exclusive HD Trailer. From “The CDC has Gone Hollywood,” posted by Karen De Coster, July 25, 2011.
17. “Vaccines as Biological Weapons? Live Avian Flu Virus Placed in Baxter Vaccine Materials Sent to 18 Countries,” by Mike Adams. NaturalNews.com, March 3, 2009.
18. “Agent: I was Ordered to Let U.S. Guns into Mexico,” by Sharyl Attkisson, CBS News Correspondent. CBSNews.Com, March 3, 2011.
19. “Anthrax Vaccine: Children Targeted for Testing,” by Marti Oakley. The PPJ Gazette, May 9, 2011.
20. “U.S. Government Expands BioThrax Procurement Contract to 17.92M Doses from 14.5M Increasing Contract Value by up to $101 Million.” Business Wire, May 2, 2011.
21. “What Do the Sears Tower; WTC, and Terror Drills Have in Common?” by Shepard Ambellas and Alex Thomas. TheIntelHub.com, June 10, 2010.
© 2011 Stephen L’Hommedieu – All Rights Reserved
Stephen C. L’Hommedieu, DC resides in Wichita, Kansas. His practice, Advanced Alternatives for Health, specializes in many difficult to treat health conditions. His clinical expertise is in developing safe and effective methods for treatment of toxic metals and chemicals. These he considers being the most insidious substances to human health, and a component of all chronic health issues, such as allergies, asthma, autism, etc. He has the ability for uncovering and explaining the unexplainable underlying reasons behind complex health disorders.
Dr. L’Hommedieu graduated from the University of Maryland, College Park in 1992 with a Bachelor of Science in Biology and an emphasis in physiology. He went on to complete a second Bachelor of Science in Human Anatomy, and in 1996 received a Doctor of Chiropractic from Parker College of Chiropractic in Dallas, Texas. His postgraduate and personal studies emphasize areas of kinesiology, therapeutic nutrition, acupuncture, chiropractic, biochemistry and organic chemistry.
As a Christian, Dr. L’Hommedieu stands on the whole truth of scripture, and believes God’s hand in our healing works through both His physical and Spiritual laws. Dr. L’Hommedieu is a purveyor of education in health care, and readily defends the truth of real science, alternatives in health care and our freedom of choice. He presents lectures and articles on various nutritional and health topics.
For comments or questions you may contact Dr. L’Hommedieu at his website: www.AdvancedAlternativesForHealth.com.