Archive for November, 2011


This lengthy letter, written back in 1954, is absolutely vital in understanding the “Big Lie” – and uncovering the “Synagogue of Satan” – the “Hidden Hand” controlling world events today.   Facts are indeed FACTS – and The Truth  Shall Set Us Free!

Thanks Mr. Freed-man – may we all be just as FREE!

True Ott – November 30, 2011

‘FACTS ARE FACTS’

THE TRUTH ABOUT KHAZARS (the so-called Jews)

Distinguishing between the “Jew”, and Hebrews who are Israelites.

By Benjamin H. Freedman: ‘A Jewish man writes about the Jews’

‘FACTS ARE FACTS’

The historic facts revealed here for the first time provide incontestable evidence that their continued suppression will prove inimical to the security of the nation, the peace of the world, the welfare of humanity, and the progress of civilization.

A facsimile reproduction reprinted and typeset to meet the many requests for a copy of the letter addressed to: DR. DAVID GOLDSTEIN, LL.D., of Boston, Mass. by its author BENJAMIN H. FREEDMAN of New York City Dated October 10, 1954

Former Zionist operative and Jewish defector Benjamin Freedman is shown here with a 1960 edition of the newspaper that was the primary venue for his writings after WWII, Common Sense.

DEDICATION: to all men of good will of all racial origins and of all religious faiths    Knowledge is a collection of facts. Wisdom is the use of knowledge. Without facts there is no knowledge. Without knowledge there is no wisdom. Facts prevent what nothing can cure. Facts are Man’s best defense mechanism. Without them men fumble, falter and fail. Without them nations decline and fall. Wisdom wins wars before they start. Knowledge aborts national hostilities. Wisdom obviates racial antipathies. Knowledge effaces religious animosities. Emancipation from bigotry prefaces peace. Intolerance takes all and gives nothing. Peace rewards reciprocal respect and regard. To all Men of Good Will, “Pax Vobiscum!” – Benjamin H. Freedman

 

THE TRUTH ABOUT KHAZARS
960 Park Ave. New York City October Tenth, 1954.
SPECIAL DELIVERY Dr. David Goldstein LL.D.,
Astor Post Office Station, Boston, Massachusetts.

My Dear Dr. Goldstein,

Your very outstanding achievements as a convert to Catholicism impress me as without a comparable parallel in modern history. Your devotion to the doctrine and the dogmas of the Roman Catholic Church defy any attempt at description by me only with words. Words fail me for that.

As a vigorous protagonist preserving so persistently in propagating the principles of the Roman Catholic Church, -its purposes, its policies, its programs,- your dauntless determination is the inspiration for countless others who courageously seek to follow in your footsteps.

In view of this fact it requires great courage for me to write to you as I am about to do. So I pray you receive this communication from me you will try to keep in mind Galatians 4:16 “Am I therefor become you enemy, because I tell you the truth?” I hope you will so favor me.

It is truly a source of great pleasure and genuine gratification to greet you at long last although of necessity by correspondence. It is quite a disappointment for me to make your acquaintance in this manner. It would now afford me a far greater pleasure and a great privilege also if instead I could greet you on this occasion in person.

Our very good mutual friend has for long been planning a meeting with you in person for me. I still wish to do that. I look forward with pleasant anticipation to doing this in the not too distant future at a time agreeable with you.

You will discover in the contents of this long letter valid evidence for the urgency on my part to communicate with you without further delay. You will further discover this urgency reflected in the present gravity of the crisis which now jeopardizes an uninterrupted continuance of the Christian faith in its long struggle as the world’s most effective spiritual and social force in the Divine mission of promoting the welfare of all mankind without regard for their diversified races, religions, and nationalities.

Your most recent article coming to my attention appeared in the September issue of ‘The A.P.J. Bulletin’, the official publication of the organization calling themselves The Archconfraternity of Prayer for Peace and Goodwill to Israel. The headline of your article, ‘News and Views of Jews’, and the purpose of the organization stated in the masthead of the publication, “To Promote Interest in the Apostalate to Israel” prompts me to take Father Time by his forelock and promptly offer my comments. I beg your indulgence accordingly.

It is with reluctance that I place my comments in letter form. I hesitate to do so but I find it the only expedient thing to do under the circumstances. I beg to submit them to you now without reservations of any nature for your immediate and earnest consideration. It is my very sincere wish that you accept them in the friendly spirit in which they are submitted. It is also my hope that you will give your consideration to them and favor me with your early reply in the same friendly spirit for which I thank you in advance.

In the best interests of that worthy objective to which you are continuing to dedicate the years ahead as you have so diligently done for many past decades, I most respectfully and sincerely urge you to analyze and to study carefully the data submitted to you here. I suggest also that you then take whatever steps you consider appropriate and necessary as a result of your conclusions. In the invisible and intangible ideological war being waged in defense of the great Christian heritage against its dedicated enemies your positive attitude is vital to victory. Your passive attitude will make a negative contribution to the total effort.

You assuredly subscribe fully to that sound and sensible sentiment that “it is better to light one candle than to sit in darkness.” My solitary attempts to date “to give light to them that sit in darkness, and in the shadow” may prove no more successful with you now than they have in so many other instances where I have failed during the past thirty years. In your case I feel rather optimistic at the moment.

Although not completely in vain I still live in the hope that one day on of these “candles” will burst into flame like a long smoldering spark and start a conflagration that will sweep across the nation like a prairie fire and illuminate vast new horizons for the first time. That unyielding hope is the source of the courage which aids me in my struggle against the great odds to which I am subjected for obvious reasons.

It has been correctly contended for thousands of years that “In the end Truth always prevails.” We all realize that Truth in action can prove itself a dynamic power of unlimited force. But alas Truth has no self-starter. Truth cannot get off dead-center unless a worthy apostle gives Truth a little push to overcome its inertia. Without that start Truth will stand still and will never arrive at its intended destination. Truth has often died aborning for that most logical reason. Your help in this respect will prove of great value.

On the other hand Truth has many times been completely “blacked out” by repeating contradictory and conflicting untruths over and over again, and again, and again. The world’s recent history supplies sober testimony of the dangers to civilization inherent in that technique. That form of treason to Truth is treachery to mankind. You must be very careful, my dear Dr. Goldstein, not to become unwittingly one of the many accessories before and after the fact who have appeared upon the scene of public affairs in recent years.

Whether unwittingly, unwillingly or unintentionally many of history’s most noted characters have misrepresented the truth to the world and they have been so believed that it puzzles our generation. As recently as 1492 the world was misrepresented as flat by all the best alleged authorities on the subject. In 1492 Christopher Columbus was able to demonstrate otherwise. There are countless similar instances in the history of the world.

Whether these alleged authorities were guilty of ignorance or indifference is here beside the point. It is not important now. They were either totally ignorant of the facts or they knew the facts but chose to remain silent on the subject for reasons undisclosed by history. A duplication of this situation exists today with respect to the crisis which confronts the Christian faith. It is a vital factor today in the struggle for survival or the eventual surrender of the Christian faith to its enemies. The times in which we are living appear to be the “zero hour” for the Christian faith.

As you have observed, no institution in our modern society can long survive if its structure is not from its start erected upon a foundation of Truth. The Christian faith was first erected upon a very solid foundation of Truth by its Founder. To survive it must remain so. The deterioration, the disintegration, and finally the destruction of the structure of the Christian faith today will be accelerated in direct ratio to the extent that misrepresentation and distortion of Truth become the substitutes of Truth. Truth is an absolute quality. Truth can never be relative. There can be no degrees to Truth. Truth either exists or it does not exist. To be half-true is as incredible as to be half-honest or to be half-loyal.

As you have undoubtedly also learned, my dear Dr. Goldstein, in their attempt to do an “ounce” of good in one direction many well-intentioned persons do a “ton” of harm in another direction. We all learn that lesson sooner or later in life. Today finds you dedicating your unceasing efforts and your untiring energy to the task of bringing so-called or self-styled “Jews” into the Roman Catholic Church as converts. It must recall to you many times the day so many years ago when you embraced Catholicism yourself as a convert. More power to you, and the best of luck. May your efforts be rewarded with great success.

Without you becoming aware of the fact, the methods you employ contribute in no small degree to dilution of the devotion of countless Christians for their Christian faith. For each “ounce” of so- called good you accomplish by conversion of so-called or self- styled “Jews” to the Christian faith at the same time you do a “ton” of harm in another direction by diluting the devotion of countless Christians for their Christian faith. This bold conclusion on my part is asserted by me with the firm and fair conviction that the facts will support my contention. In addition it is a well-known fact that many “counterfeit” recent conversions reveal that conversions have often proved to be but “infiltrations” by latent traitors with treasonable intentions.

The attitudes you express today and your continued activity in this work require possible revision in the light of the facts submitted to you in this letter. Your present philosophy and theology on this subject seriously merit, without any delay, reconsideration on your part. What you say or write may greatly influence a “boom” or a “bust” for the Christian faith in the very near future far beyond your ability to accurately evaluate sitting in your high “white ivory tower.” The Christians implicitly believe whatever you write. So do the so-called or self-styled “Jews” whom you seek to convert. This influence you wield can become a danger. I must call it to your attention.

Your reaction to the facts called to your attention in this letter can prove to be one of the most crucial verdicts ever reached bearing upon the security of the Christian faith in recent centuries. In keeping with this great responsibility I sincerely commend this sentiment to you hoping that you will earnestly study the contents of this letter from its first word to its very last word. All who know you will are in the fortunate position to know how close this subject is to your heart. By your loyalty to the high ideals you have observed during the many years you have labored so valiantly on behalf of the Christian faith you have earned the admiration you enjoy. The Christian faith you chose of your own free will in the prime of life is very proud of you in more ways than as a convert.

Regardless of what anyone anywhere and anytime in this whole wide world may say to the contrary, events of recent years everywhere establish beyond any question of a doubt that the Christian faith today stands with one foot in the grave and the other on a banana peel figuratively speaking of course. Only those think otherwise who deliberately shut their eyes to realities or who do not chose to see even with their eyes wide open. I believe you to be too realistic to indulge yourself in the futile folly of fooling yourself.

It is clear that the Christian faith today stands at the cross- roads of its destiny. The Divine and sacred mission of the Christian faith is in jeopardy today to a degree never witnessed before in its long history of almost 2000 years. The Christian faith needs loyal friends now as never before. I somehow feel that you can always be counted upon as one of its loyal friends. You cannot over-simplify the present predicament of the Christian faith. The problem it faces is too self-evident to mistake. It is in a critical situation.

When the day arrives that Christians can no longer profess their Christian faith as they profess it today in the free world the Christian faith will have seen the beginning of its “last days.” What already applies to 50% of the world’s total population can shortly apply equally to 100% of the world’s total population. It is highly conceivable judging from present trends. The malignant character of this malady is just as progressive as cancer. It will surely prove as fatal also unless steps are taken now to reverse its course. What is now being done toward arresting its progress or reversing its trend?

My dear Dr. Goldstein, can you recall the name of the philosopher who is quoted as saying that “Nothing in this world is permanent except change?” That philosophy must be applied to the Christian faith also. The $64 question remains whether the change will be for the better or for the worse. The problem is that simple. If the present trend continues for another 37 years in the same direction and at the same rate traveled for the past 37 years the Christian faith as it is professed today by Christians will have disappeared from the face of the earth. In what form or by what instrumentality the mission of Jesus Christ will thereupon and thereafter continue to make itself manifest here on earth is as unpredictable as it is inevitable.

In the existing crisis it is neither logical nor realistic to drive Christians out of the Christian “fold” in relatively large numbers for the dubious advantage to be obtained by bringing a comparatively small number of so-called or self-styled “Jews” into the Christian “fold”.

It is useless to try to deny the fact that today finds the Christian faith on the defense throughout the world. This realization staggers the imagination of the few Christians who understand the situation. This status of the Christian faith exists in spite of the magnificent contributions of the Christian faith to the progress of humanity and civilization for almost 2000 years. It is not my intention in this letter to expose the conspirators who are dedicating themselves to the destruction of the Christian faith nor to the nature and extent of the conspiracy itself. That exposure would fill many volumes.

The history of the world for the past several centuries and current events at home and abroad confirm the existence of such a conspiracy. The world-wide network of diabolical conspirators implement this plot against the Christian faith while Christians appear to be sound asleep. The Christian clergy appear to be more ignorant or more indifferent about this conspiracy than other Christians. They seem to bury their heads in the sands of ignorance or indifference like the legendary ostrich. This ignorance or indifference on the part of the Christian clergy has dealt a blow to the Christian faith already from which it may never completely recover, if at all. It seems so sad.

Christians deserve to be blessed in this crisis with a spiritual Paul Revere to ride across the nation warning Christians that their enemies are moving in on them fast. My dear Dr. Goldstein, will you volunteer to be that Paul Revere?

Of equal importance to pin-pointing the enemies who are making war upon the Christian faith from the outside is the necessity to discover the forces at work inside the Christian faith which make it so vulnerable to its enemies on the outside. Applying yourself to this specific phase of the problem can prove of tremendous value in rendering ineffective the forces responsible for this dangerous state of affairs.

The souls of millions of Christians who are totally unknown to you are quite uneasy about the status of the Christian faith today. The minds of countless thousands among the Christian clergy are troubled by the mysterious “pressure” from above which prevents them exercising their sound judgment in this situation. If the forces being manipulated against the Christian faith from the inside can be stopped the Christian faith will be able to stand upon its feet against its enemies as the Rock of Gibraltar. Unless this can be done soon the Christian faith appears destined to crumble and to eventually collapse. An ounce of prevention is far preferable to a pound of cure you can be sure in this situation as in all others.

With all the respect due to the Christian clergy and in all humility I have an unpleasant duty to perform. I wish to go on record with you here that the Christian clergy are primarily if not solely responsible for the internal forces within the Christian faith inimical to its best interests. This conclusion on my part indicates the sum total of all the facts in my book which add up to just that. If you truly desire to be realistic and constructive you must “hew to the line and let the chips fall where they may.” That is the only strategy that can save the Christian faith from a fate it does not deserve. You cannot pussy-foot with the truth any longer simply because you find that now “the truth hurts”, -someone you know or like.

At this late hour very little time is left in which to mend our fences if I can call it that. We are not in a position to waste any of our limited time. “Beating it around the bush” now will get us exactly nowhere. The courageous alone will endure the present crisis when all the chips are down. Figuratively and possibly literally there will be live heroes and dead cowards when the dust of this secular combat settles and not dead heroes and live cowards as sometimes occurs under other circumstances. The Christian faith today remains the only “anchor to windward” against universal barbarism. The dedicated enemies of the Christian faith have sufficiently convinced the world by this time of the savage methods they will adopt in their program to erase the Christian faith from the face of the earth.

Earlier in this letter I stated that in my humble opinion the apathy of the Christian clergy might be charged with sole responsibility for the increasing dilution of the devotion of countless Christians for the Christian faith. This is the natural consequence of the confusion created by the Christian clergy in the minds of Christians concerning certain fundamentals of the Christian faith. The guilt for this confusion rests exclusively upon Christian leadership not upon Christians generally. Confusion creates doubt. Doubt creates loss of confidence. Loss of confidence creates loss of interest. As confusion grows more, and more, and more confidence grows less, and less, and less. The result is complete loss of all interest. You can hardly disagree with that, my dear Dr. Goldstein, can you?

The confusion in the minds of Christians concerning fundamentals of the Christian faith is unwarranted and unjustified. It need not exist. It would not exist if the Christian clergy did not aid and abet the deceptions responsible for it. The Christian clergy may be shocked to learn that they have been aiding and abetting the dedicated enemies of the Christian faith. Many of the Christian clergy are actually their allies but may not know it. This phase of the current world-wide campaign of spiritual sabotage is the most negative factor in the defense of the Christian faith.

Countless Christians standing on the sidelines in this struggle see their Christian faith “withering on the vine” and about ripe enough to “drop into the lap” of its dedicated enemies. They can do nothing about it. Their cup is made more bitter for them as they observe this unwarranted and this unjustified ignorance and indifference on the part of the Christian clergy. This apathetic attitude by the Christian clergy offers no opposition to the aggressors against the Christian faith. Retreat can only bring defeat. To obviate surrender to their dedicated enemies the Christian clergy must “about face” immediately if they expect to become the victors in the invisible and intangible ideological war now being so subversively waged against the Christian faith under their very noses. When will they wake up?

If I were asked to recite in this letter the many manners in which the Christian clergy are confusing the Christian concept of the fundamentals of the Christian faith it would require volumes rather than pages to tell the whole story. Space alone compels me here to confine myself to the irreducible minimum. I will limit myself here to the most important reasons for this confusion. Brevity will of necessity limit the references cited to support the matters presented in this letter. I will do my best under the circumstances to establish the authenticity of the incontestable historical facts I call to your attention here.

In my opinion the most important reason is directly related to your present activities. Your responsibility for this confusion is not lessened by your good intentions. As you have heard said so many times “Hell is paved with good intentions.” The confusion your articles create is multiplied a thousand-fold by the wide publicity given to them as a result of the very high regard in which you personally are held by editors and readers across the nation, Christian and non-Christian alike. Your articles constantly are continually reprinted and quoted from coast to coast.

The utterance by the Christian clergy which confuses Christians the most is the constantly repeated utterance that “Jesus was a Jew.” That also appears to be your favorite theme. That misrepresentation and distortion of an incontestable historic fact is uttered by the Christian clergy upon the slightest pretext. They utter it constantly, also without provocation. They appear to be “trigger happy” to utter it. They never miss an opportunity to do so. Informed intelligent Christians cannot reconcile this truly unwarranted misrepresentation and distortion of an incontestable historic fact by the Christian clergy with information known by them now to the contrary which comes to them from sources believed by them to be equally reliable.

This poses a serious problem today for the Christian clergy. They can extricate themselves from their present predicament now only be resorting to “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth”. That is the only formula by which the Christian clergy can recapture the lost confidence of Christians. As effective spiritual leaders they cannot function without this lost confidence. They should make that their first order of business.

My dear Dr. Goldstein, you are a theologian of high rank and a historian of note. Of necessity you also should agree with other outstanding authorities on the subject of whether “Jesus was a Jew.” These leading authorities agree today that there is no foundation in fact for the implications, inferences and the innuendoes resulting from the incorrect belief that “Jesus was a Jew”. Incontestable historic facts and an abundance of other proofs establish beyond the possibility of any doubt the incredibility of the assertion so often heard today that “Jesus was a Jew”.

Without any fear of contradiction based upon fact the most competent and best qualified authorities all agree today that Jesus Christ was not a so-called or self-styled “Jew”. They do confirm that during His lifetime Jesus was known as a “Judean” by His contemporaries and not as a “Jew”, and that Jesus referred to Himself as a “Judean” and not as a “Jew”. During His lifetime here on earth Jesus was referred to by contemporary historians as a “Judean” and not as a “Jew.” Contemporary theologians of Jesus whose competence to pass upon this subject cannot challenge by anyone today also referred to Jesus during his lifetime here on earth as a “Judean” and not as a “Jew”.

Inscribed upon the Cross when Jesus was Crucified were the Latin words “Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudeorum”. Pontius Pilate’s mother-tongue. No one will question the fact that Pontius Pilate was well able to accurately express his own ideas in his own mother-tongue. The authorities competent to pass upon the correct translation into English of the Latin “Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudeorum” agree that it is “Jesus of Nazarene Ruler of the Judeans.” There is no disagreement upon that by them.

During His lifetime here on earth Jesus was not regarded by Pontius Pilate nor by the Judeans among whom He dwelt as “King of the Jews”. The inscription on the Cross upon which Jesus was Crucified has been incorrectly translated into the English language only since the 18th century. Pontius Pilate was ironic and sarcastic when he ordered inscribed upon the Cross the Latin words “Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudeorum”. About to be Crucified, with the approval of Pontius Pilate, Jesus was being mocked by Pontius Pilate. Pontius Pilate was well aware at that time that Jesus had been denounced, defied and denied by the Judeans who alas finally brought about His Crucifixion as related by history.

Except for His few followers at that time in Judea all other Judeans abhorred Jesus and detested His teachings and the things for which He stood. That deplorable fact cannot be erased from history by time. Pontius Pilate was himself the “ruler” of the Judeans at the time he ordered inscribed upon the Cross in Latin words “Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudeorum”, In English “Jesus the Nazarene Ruler of the Judeans”. But Pontius Pilate never referred to himself as “ruler” of the Judeans. The ironic and sarcastic reference of Pontius Pilate to Jesus as “Ruler of the Judeans” can hardly be accepted as recognition by Pontius Pilate of Jesus as “Ruler of the Judeans”. That is inconceivable by any interpretation.

At the time of the Crucifixion of Jesus Pontius Pilate was the administrator in Judea for the Roman Empire. At that time in history the area of the Roman Empire included a part of the Middle East. As far as he was concerned officially or personally the inhabitants of Judea were “Judeans” to Pontius Pilate and not so- called “Jews” as they have been styled since the 18th century. In the time of Pontius Pilate and not so-called “Jews” as they have been styled since the 18th century. In the time of Pontius Pilate in history there was no religious, racial or national group in Judea known as “Jews” nor had there been any group so identified anywhere else in the world prior to that time.

Pontius Pilate expressed little interest as the administrator of the Roman Empire officially or personally in the wide variety of forms of religious worship then practiced in Judea. These forms of religious worship extended from phallic worship and other forms of idolatry to the emerging spiritual philosophy of an eternal, omnipotent and invisible Divine deity, the emerging Yahve (Jehovah) concept which predated Abraham of Bible fame by approximately 2000 years. As the administrator for the Roman Empire in Judea it was the official policy of Pontius Pilate never to interfere in the spiritual affairs of the local population. Pontius Pilate’s primary responsibility was the collection of taxes to be forwarded home to Rome, not the forms of religious worship practiced by the Judeans from whom those taxes were collected.

As you well know, my dear Dr. Goldstein, the Latin word “rex” means “ruler, leader” in English. During the lifetime of Jesus in Judea the Latin word “rex” meant only that to Judeans familiar with the Latin language. The Latin word “rex” is the Latin verb “rego, regere, rexi, rectus” in English means as you also well know “to rule, to lead”. Latin was of course the official language in all the provinces administered by a local administrator of the Roman Empire. This fact accounts for the inscription on the Cross in Latin.

With the invasion of the British Isles by the Anglo-Saxons, the English language substituted the Anglo-Saxon “king” for the Latin equivalent “rex” used before the Anglo-Saxon invasion. The adoption of “king” for “rex” at this late date in British history did not retroactively alter the meaning of the Latin “rex” to the Judeans in the time of Jesus. The Latin “rex” to them then meant only “ruler, leader” as it still means in Latin. Anglo-Saxon “king” was spelled differently when first used but at all times meant the same as “rex” in Latin, “leader” of a tribe.

During the lifetime of Jesus it was very apparent to Pontius Pilate that Jesus was the very last Person in Judea the Judeans would select as their “ruler” or their “leader”. In spite of this situation in Judea Pontius Pilate did not hesitate to order the inscription of the Cross “Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudeorum”. By the wildest stretch of the imagination it is not conceivable that this sarcasm and irony by Pontius Pilate at the time of the Crucifixion was not solely mockery of Jesus by Pontius Pilate and only mockery. After this reference to “Jesus the Nazarene Ruler of the Judeans” the Judeans forthwith proceeded to Crucify Jesus upon that very Cross.

In Latin in the lifetime of Jesus the name of the political subdivision in the Middle East known in modern history as Palestine was “Iudaea”. It was then administered by Pontius Pilate as administrator for the Roman Empire of which it was then a part. The English for the Latin “Iudaea” is “Judea”. English “Judean” is the adjective for the noun “Judea”. The ancient native population of the subdivision in the Middle East known in modern history as Palestine was then called “Iudaeus” in Latin and “Judean” in English. Those words identified the indigenous population of Judea in the lifetime of Jesus. Who can deny that Jesus was a member of the indigenous population of Judea in His lifetime?

And of course you know, my dear Dr. Goldstein, in Latin the Genitive Plural of “Iudaeus” is “Iudaeorum”. The English translation of the Genitive Plural of “Iudaeorum” is “of the Judeans”. It is utterly impossible to give any other English translation to “Iudaeorum” than “of the Judeans”. Qualified and competent theologians and historians regard as incredible any other translation into English of “Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum” than “Jesus the Nazarene Ruler of the Judeans”. You must agree that this is literally correct.

At the time Pontius Pilate was ordering the “Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum” inscribed upon the Cross the spiritual leaders of Judea were protesting to Pontius Pilate “not to write that Jesus was the ruler of the Judeans” but to inscribe instead that Jesus “had said that He was the ruler of the Judeans”. The spiritual leaders of Judea made very strong protests to Pontius Pilate against his reference to Jesus as “Rex Iudaeorum” insisting that Pontius Pilate was not familiar with or misunderstood the status of Jesus in Judea. These protests are a matter of historical record, as you know.

The spiritual leaders in Judea protested in vain with Pontius Pilate. They insisted that Jesus “had said that He was the ruler of the Judeans” but that Pontius Pilate was “not to write that Jesus was the ruler of the Judeans”. For after all Pontius Pilate was a foreigner in Judea who could not understand the local situations as well as the spiritual leaders. The intricate pattern of the domestic political, social and economic cross-currents in Judea interested Pontius Pilate very little as Rome’s administrator.

The Gospel by John was written originally in the Greek language according to the best authorities. In the Greek original there is no equivalent for the English that Jesus “had said that He was the ruler of the Judeans”. The English translation of the Greek original of the Gospel by John, XIX, 19, reads “Do not inscribe ‘the monarch (basileus) of the Judeans (Ioudaios), but that He Himself said I am monarch (basileus) of the Judeans (Ioudaios)’ “. “Ioudaia” is the Greek for the Latin for “basileus” in Greek. The English “ruler”, or its alternative “leader”, define the sense of Latin “rex” and Greek “basileus” as they were used in the Greek and Latin Gospel of John.

Pontius Pilate “washed his hands” of the protests by the spiritual leaders in Judea who demanded of him that the inscription on the Cross authored by Pontius Pilate be corrected in the manner they insisted upon. Pontius Pilate be corrected in the manner they insisted upon. Pontius Pilate very impatiently replied to their demands “What I have written, I have written.” The inscription on the Cross remained what it had been, “Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum”, or “Jesus the Nazarene Ruler of the Judeans” in English.

The Latin quotations and words mentioned in this letter are verbatim quotations and the exact words which appear in the 4th century translation of the New Testament into Latin by St. Jerome. This translation is referred to as the Vulgate Edition of the New Testament. It was the first official translation of the New Testament into Latin made by the Christian Church. Since that time it has remained the official New Testament version used by the Catholic Church. The translation of the Gospel of John into Latin by St. Jerome was made from the Greek language in which the Gospel of John was originally written according to the best authorities on this subject.

The English translation of the gospel by John XIX, 19, from the original text in the Greek language reads as follows, “Pilate wrote a sign and fastened it to the Cross and the writing was “Jesus the Nazarene the monarch of the Judeans’ “. In the original Greek manuscript there is mention also made of the demands upon Pontius Pilate by the spiritual leaders in Judea that Pontius Pilate alter the reference on the Cross to Jesus as “Ruler of the Judeans”. The Greek text of the original manuscript of the Gospel by John establishes beyond any question or doubt that the spiritual leaders in Judea at that time had protested to Pontius Pilate that Jesus was “not the ruler of the Judeans” but only “had said that He was the ruler of the Judeans”.

There is no factual foundation in history or theology today for the implications, inferences and innuendoes that the Greek “Ioudaios”, the Latin “Iudaeus”, or the English “Judean:” ever possessed a valid religious connotation. In their three respective languages these three words have only indicated a strictly topographical or geographical connotation. In their correct sense these three words in their respective languages were used to identify the members of the indigenous native population of the geographic area known as Judea in the lifetime of Jesus. During the lifetime of Jesus there was not a form of religious worship practiced in Judea or elsewhere in the known world which bore a name even remotely resembling the name of the political subdivision of the Roman Empire; i.e., “Judaism” from “Judea”. No cult or sect existed by such a name.

It is an incontestable fact that the word “Jew” did not come into existence until the year 1775. Prior to 1775 the word “Jew” did not exist in any language. The word “Jew” was introduced into the English for the first time in the 18th century when Sheridan used it in his play “The Rivals”, II,i, “She shall have a skin like a mummy, and the beard of a Jew”. Prior to this use of the word “Jew” in the English language by Sheridan in 1775 the word “Jew” had not become a word in the English language. Shakespeare never saw the word “Jew” as you will see. Shakespeare never used the word “Jew” in any of his works, the common general belief to the contrary notwithstanding. In his “Merchant of Venice”, V.III.i.61, Shakespeare wrote as follows: “what is the reason? I am a Iewe; hath not a Iewe eyes?”.

In the Latin St. Jerome 4th century Vulgate Edition of the New Testament Jesus is referred to by the Genitive Plural of “Iudaeus” in the Gospel of John reference to the inscription on the Cross, – “Iudaeorum”. It was in the 4th century that St. Jerome translated into Latin the manuscripts of the New Testament from the original languages in which they were written. This translation by St. Jerome is referred to still today as the Vulgate Edition by the Roman Catholic Church authorities, who use it today.

Jesus is referred as a so-called “Jew” for the first time in the New Testament in the 18th century. Jesus is first referred to as a so-called “Jew” in the revised 18th century editions in the English language of the 14th century first translations of the New Testament into English. The history of the origin of the word “Jew” in the English language leaves no doubt that the 18th century “Jew” is the 18th century contracted and corrupted English word for the 4th century Latin “Iudaeus” found in St. Jerome’s Vulgate Edition. Of that there is no longer doubt.

The available manuscripts from the 4th century to the 18th century accurately trace the origin and give the complete history of the word “Jew” in the English language. In these manuscripts are to be found all the many earlier English equivalents extending through the 14 centuries from the 4th to the 18th century. From the Latin “Iudaeus” to the English “Jew” these English forms included successively: “Gyu”, “Giu”, “Iu”, “Iuu”, “Iuw”, “Ieuu”, “Ieuy”, “Iwe”, “Iow”, “Iewe”, “leue”, “Iue”, “Ive”, “lew”, and then finally in the 18th century, “Jew”. The many earlier English equivalents for “Jews” through the 14 centuries are “Giwis”, “Giws”, “Gyues”, “Gywes”, “Giwes”, “Geus”, “Iuys”, “Iows”, “Iouis”, “Iews”, and then also finally in the 18th century, “Jews”.

With the rapidly expanding use in England in the 18th century for the first time in history of the greatly improved printing presses unlimited quantities of the New Testament were printed. These revised 18th century editions of the earlier 14th century first translations into the English language were then widely distributed throughout England and the English speaking world among families who had never possessed a copy of the New Testament in any language. In these 18th century editions with revisions the word “Jew” appeared for the first time in any English translations. The word “Jew” as it was used in the 18th century editions has since continued in use in all elections of the New Testament in the English language. The use of the word “Jew” thus was stabilized.

As you know, my dear Dr. Goldstein, the best known 18th century editions of the New Testament in English are the Rheims (Douai) Edition and the King James Authorized Edition. The Rheims (Douai) translation of the New Testament into English was first printed in 1582 but the word “Jew” did not appear in it. The King James Authorized translation of the New Testament into English was begun in 1604 and first published in 1611. The word “Jew” did not appear in it either. The word “Jew” appeared in both these well known editions in their 18th century revised versions for the first times.

Countless copies of the revised 18th century editions of the Rheims (Douai) and the King James translations of the New Testament into English were distributed to the clergy and the laity throughout the English speaking world. They did not know the history of the origin of the English word “Jew” nor did they care. They accepted the English word “Jew” as the only and as the accepted form of the Latin “Iudaeus” and the Greek “Ioudaios”. How could they be expected to have known otherwise? The answer is they could not and they did not. It was a new English word to them.

When you studied Latin in your school days you were taught that the letter “I” in Latin when used as the first letter in a word is pronounced like the letter “Y” in English when it is the first letter in words like “yes”, “youth” and “yacht”. The “I” in “Iudaeus” is pronounced like the “Y” in “yes”, “youth”, and “yacht” in English. In all the 4th century to 18th century forms for the 18th century “Jew” the letter “I” was pronounced like the English “Y” in “yes”, “youth”, and “yacht”. The same is true of the “Gi” or the “Gy” where it was used in place of the letter “I”.

The present pronunciation of the word “Jew” in modern English is a development of recent times. In the English language today the “J” in “Jew” is pronounced like the “J” in the English “justice”, “jolly”, and “jump”. This is the case only since the 18th century. Prior to the 18th century the “J” in “Jew” was pronounced exactly like the “Y” in the English “yes”, “youth”, and “yacht”. Until the 18th century and perhaps even later than the 18th century the word “Jew” in English was pronounced like the English “you” or “hew”, and the word “Jews” like “youse” or “hews”. The present pronunciation of “Jew” in English is a new pronunciation acquired after the 18th century.

The German language still retains the Latin original pronunciation. The German “Jude” is the German equivalent of the English “Jew”. The “J” in the German “Jude” is pronounced exactly like the English “Y” in “yes”, “youth”, and “yacht”. The German “J” is the equivalent of the Latin “I” and both are pronounced exactly like the English “Y” in “yes”, “youth” and “yacht”. The German “Jude” is virtually the first syllable of the Latin “Iudaeus” and is pronounced exactly like it. The German “Jude” is the German contraction and corruption of the Latin “Iudaeus” just as the English “Jew” is the contraction and corruption of the Latin “Iudaeus”. The German “J” is always pronounced like the English “Y” in “yes”, “youth”, and “yacht” when it is the first letter of a word. The pronunciation of the “J” in German “Jude” is not an exception to the pronunciation of the “J” in German.

The English language as you already know, my dear Dr. Goldstein, is largely made up of words adopted from foreign languages. After their adoption by the English language foreign words were then adapted by contracting their spelling and corrupting their foreign pronunciation to make them more easily pronounced in English from their English spelling. This process of first adopting foreign words and then adapting them by contracting their spelling and corrupting their pronunciation resulted in such new words in the English language as “cab” from the French “cabriolet” and many thousands of other words similarly from their original foreign spelling. Hundreds of others must come to your mind.

By this adopting-adapting process the Latin “Iudacus” and the Greek “Ioudaios” finally emerged in the 18th century as “Jew” in the English language. The English speaking peoples struggled through 14 centuries seeking to create for the English language an English equivalent for the Latin “Iudaeus” and the Greek “Ioudaios” which could be easily pronounced in English from its English spelling. The English “Jew” was the resulting 18th century contracted and corrupted form of the Latin “Iudaeus” and the Greek “Ioudaios”. The English “Jew” is easily pronounced in English from its English spelling. The Latin “Iudaeus” and the Greek “Ioudaios” cannot be as easily pronounced in English from the Latin and Greek spelling. They were forced to coin a word.

The earliest version of the New Testament in English from the Latin Vulgate Edition is the Wyclif, or Wickliffe Edition published in 1380. In the Wyclif Edition Jesus is there mentioned as One of the “iewes”. That was the 14th century English version of the Latin “Iudaeus” and was pronounced “hew-weeze”, in the plural, and “iewe” pronounced “hew-wee” in the singular. In the 1380 Wyclif Edition in English the Gospel by John, XIX.19, reads “Ihesus of nazareth kyng of the iewes”. Prior to the 14th century the English language adopted the Anglo-Saxon “kyng” together with many other Anglo-Saxon words in place of the Latin “rex” and the Greek “basileus”. The Anglo-Saxon also meant “tribal leader”.

In the Tyndale Edition of the New Testament in English published in 1525 Jesus was likewise described as One of the “Iewes”. In the Coverdale Edition published in 1535 Jesus was also described as One of the “Iewes”. In the Coverdale Edition the Gospel by John, XIX.19, reads “Iesus the Nazareth, kynge of the “Iewes”. In the Cranmer Edition published in 1539 Jesus was again described as One of the “Iewes”. In the Geneva Edition published in 1540-1557 Jesus was also described as One of the “Iewes”. In the Rheims Edition published in 1582 Jesus was described as One of the “Ievves”. In the King James Edition published in 1604-1611 also known as the Authorized Version Jesus was described again as one of the “Iewes”. The forms of the Latin “Iudaeus” were used which were current at the time these translations were made.

The translation into English of the Gospel by John, XIX.19, from the Greek in which it was originally written reads “Do not inscribe `the monarch of the Judeans’ but that He Himself said `I am monarch’ “. In the original Greek manuscript the Greek “basileus” appears for “monarch” in the English and the Greek “Ioudaios” appears for “Judeans” in the English. “Ioudaia” in Greek is “Judea” in English. “Ioudaios” in Greek is “Judeans” in English. There is no reason for any confusion.

My dear Dr. Goldstein, if the generally accepted understanding today of the English “Jew” and “Judean” conveyed the identical implications, inferences and innuendoes as both rightly should, it would make no difference which of these two words was used when referring to Jesus in the New Testament or elsewhere. But the implications, inferences, and innuendoes today conveyed by these two words are as different as black is from white. The word “Jew” today is never regarded as a synonym for “Judean” nor is “Judean” regarded as a synonym for “Jew”.

As I have explained, when the word “Jew” was first introduced into the English language in the 18th century its one and only implication, inference and innuendo was “Judean”. However during the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries a well-organized and well- financed international “pressure group” created a so-called “secondary meaning” for the word “Jew” among the English- speaking peoples of the world. This so-called “secondary meaning” for the word “Jew” bears no relation whatsoever to the 18th century original connotation of the word “Jew”. It is a misrepresentation.

The “secondary meaning” of the word “Jew” today bears as little relation to its original and correct meaning as the “secondary meaning” today as for the word “camel” bears to the original and correct meaning of the word “camel”, or the “secondary meaning” for the word “ivory” bears to the original and correct meaning of the word “ivory”. The “secondary meaning” today for the word “camel” is a cigarette by that name but its original and correct meaning is a desert animal by that ancient name. The “secondary meaning” of the word “ivory” today is a piece of soap but its original and correct meaning is the tusk of a male elephant.

The “secondary meaning” of words often become the generally accepted meanings of words formerly having entirely different meanings. This is accomplished by the expenditure of great amounts of money for well-planned publicity. Today if you ask for a “camel” someone will hand you a cigarette by that name. Today if you ask for a piece of “ivory” someone will hand you a piece of soap by that name. You will never receive either a desert animal or a piece of the tusk of a male elephant. That must illustrate the extent to which these “secondary meanings” are able to practically eclipse the original and correct meanings of words in the minds of the general public. The “secondary meaning” for the word “Jew” today has practically totally eclipsed the original and correct meaning of the word “Jew” when it was introduced as a word in the English language. This phenomena is not uncommon.

The United States Supreme Court has recognized the “secondary meaning” of words. The highest court in the land has established as basic law that “secondary meanings” can acquire priority rights to the use of any dictionary word. Well-planned and well-financed world-wide publicity through every available media by well-organized groups of so-called or self-styled “Jews” for three centuries has created a “secondary meaning” for the word “Jew” which has completely “blacked out” the original and correct meaning of the word “Jew”. There can be no doubt about that.

There is not a person in the whole English-speaking world today who regards a “Jew” as a “Judean” in the literal sense of the word. That was the correct and only meaning in the 18th century. The generally accepted “secondary meaning” of the word “Jew” today with practically no exceptions is made up of four almost universally-believed theories. These four theories are that a so- called or self-styled “Jew” is (1) a person who today professes the form of religious worship known as “Judaism”, (2) a person who claims to belong to a racial group associated with the ancient Semites, (3) a person directly the descendant of an ancient nation which thrived in Palestine in Bible history, (4) a person blessed by Divine intentional design with certain superior cultural characteristics denied to other racial, religious or national groups, all rolled into one.

The present generally accepted “secondary meaning” of the word “Jew” is fundamentally responsible for the confusion in the minds of Christians regarding elementary tenets of the Christian faith. It is likewise responsible today to a very great extent for the dilution of the devotion of countless Christians for their Christian faith. The implications, inferences and innuendoes of the word “Jew” today, to the preponderant majority of intelligent and informed Christians, is contradictory and in complete conflict with incontestable historic fact. Christians who cannot be fooled any longer are suspect of the Christian clergy who continue to repeat, and repeat, and repeat ad nauseam their pet theme song “Jesus was a Jew”. It actually now approaches a psychosis.

Countless Christians know today that they were “brain washed” by the Christian clergy on the subject “Jesus was a Jew”. The resentment they feel is not yet apparent to the Christian clergy. Christians now are demanding from the Christian clergy, “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth”. It is now time for the Christian clergy to tell Christians what they should have told them long ago. Of all religious groups in the world Christians appear to be the least informed of any on the subject. Have their spiritual leaders been reckless with the truth?

Countless intelligent and informed Christians no longer accept unchallenged assertions by the Christian clergy that Jesus in His lifetime was a Member of a group in Judea which practiced a religious form of worship then which is today called “Judaism”, or that Jesus in His lifetime here on earth was a Member of the racial group which today includes the preponderant majority of all so- called or self-styled “Jews” in the world, or that the so-called or self-styled “Jews” throughout the world today are the lineal descendants of the nation in Judea of which Jesus was a national in His lifetime here on earth, or that the cultural characteristics of so- called or self-styled “Jews” throughout the world today correspond with the cultural characteristics of Jesus during His lifetime here on earth and His teachings while He was here on earth for a brief stay. Christians will no longer believe that the race, religion, nationality and culture of Jesus and the race, religion, nationality and culture of so-called or self-styled “Jews” today or their ancestors have a common origin or character.

The resentment by Christians is more ominous than the Christian clergy suspect. Under existing conditions the Christian clergy will find that ignorance is not bliss, nor wisdom folly. Christians everywhere today are seeking to learn the authentic relationship between the so-called or self-styled “Jews” through-out the world today and the “Judeans” who populated “Judea” before, during and after the time of Jesus. Christians now insist that they be told correctly by the Christian clergy about the racial, religious, national and cultural background of the so-called or self-styled “Jews” throughout the world today and the basis for associating these backgrounds with the racial, religious, national and cultural background of Jesus in His lifetime in Judea. The intelligent and informed Christian are alerted to the exploded myth that the so- called or self-styled “Jews” throughout the world today are the direct descendants of the “Judeans” amongst whom Jesus lived during His lifetime here on earth.

Christians today are also becoming more and more alerted day by day why the so-called or self-styled “Jews” throughout the world for three centuries have spent uncounted sums of money to manufacture the fiction that the “Judeans” in the time of Jesus were “Jews” rather than “Judeans”, and that “Jesus was a Jew”. Christians are becoming more and more aware day by day of all the economic and political advantages accruing to the so-called or self- styled “Jews” as a direct result of their success in making Christians believe that “Jesus was a Jew” in the “secondary meaning” they have created for the 18th century word “Jew”. The so-called or self-styled “Jews” throughout the world today represent themselves to Christians as “Jews” only in the “secondary meaning” of the word “Jew”. They seek to thereby prove their kinship with Jesus. They emphasize this fiction to Christians constantly. That fable is fast fading and losing its former grip upon the imaginations of Christians.

To allege that “Jesus was a Jew” in the sense that during His lifetime Jesus professed and practiced the form of religious worship known and practiced under the modern name of “Judaism” is false and fiction of the most blasphemous nature. If to be a so- called or self-styled “Jew” then or now the practice of “Judaism” was a requirement then Jesus certainly was not a so-called “Jew”. Jesus abhorred and denounced the form of religious worship practiced in Judea in His lifetime and which is known and practiced today under its new name “Judaism”. That religious belief was then known as “Pharisiasm”. The Christian clergy learned that in their theological seminary days but they have never made any attempt to make that clear to Christians.

The eminent Rabbi Louis Finkelstein, the head of The Jewish Theological Seminary of America, often referred to as “The Vatican of Judaism”, in his Foreword to his First Edition of his world-famous classic “The Pharisees, The Sociological Background of Their Faith”, on page XXI states:

“…Judaism…Pharisiasm became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes in name…the spirit of the ancient Pharisees survives, unaltered…From Palestine to Babylonia; from Babylonia to North Africa, Italy, Spain, France and Germany; from these to Poland, Russia, and eastern Europe generally, ancientharisaism has wandered…demonstrates the enduring importance which attaches to Pharisaism as a religious movement…”

The celebrated Rabbi Louis Finkelstein in his great classic quoted from above traces the origin of the form of religious worship practiced today under the present name “Judaism”, to its origin as “Pharisaism” in Judea in the time of Jesus. Rabbi Louis Finkelstein confirms what the eminent Rabbi Adolph Moses states in his great classic “Yahvism, and Other Discourses”, in collaboration with the celebrated Rabbi H.G. Enlow, published in 1903 by the Louisville Section of the Council of Jewish Women, in which Rabbi Adolph Moses, on page 1, states:

“Among the innumerable misfortunes which have befallen…the most fatal in its consequences is the name Judaism…Worse still, the Jews themselves, who have gradually come to call their religion Judaism…Yet, neither in biblical nor post-biblical, neither in talmudic, nor in much later times, is the term Judaism ever heard…the Bible speaks of the religion…as “Torah Yahve”, the instruction, or the moral law revealed by Yahve…in other places…as “Yirath Yahve”, the fear and reverence of Yahve. These and other appellations CONTINUED FOR MANY AGES TO STAND FOR THE RELIGION…To distinguish it from Christianity and Islam, the Jewish philosophers sometimes designate it as the faith or belief of the Jews…IT WAS FLAVIUS JOSEPHUS, WRITING FOR THE INSTRUCTION OF GREEKS AND ROMANS, WHO COINED THE TERM JUDAISM, in order to pit it against Hellenism…by Hellenism was understood the civilization, comprising language, poetry, religion, art, science, manners, customs, institutions, which…had spread from Greece, its original home, over vast regions of Europe, Asia and Africa…The Christians eagerly seized upon the name…the Jews themselves, who intensely detested the traitor Josephus, refrained from reading his works…HENCE THE TERM JUDAISM COINED BY JOSEPHUS REMAINED ABSOLUTELY UN- KNOWN TO THEM…IT WAS ONLY IN COMPARATIVELY RECENT TIMES, AFTER THE JEWS BECAME FAMILIAR WITH MODERN CHRISTIAN LITERATURE, THAT THEY BEGAN TO NAME THEIR RELIGION JUDAISM.” (emphasis supplied).

This statement by the world’s two leading authorities on this subject clearly establishes beyond any question or any doubt that so-called “Judaism” was not the name of any form of religious worship practiced in Judea in the time of Jesus. The Flavius Josephus referred to in the above quotation lived in the 1st century. It was he who coined the word “Judaism” in the 1st century explicitly for the purpose recited clearly above. Religious worship known and practiced today under the name of “Judaism” by so- called or self-styled “Jews” throughout the world was known and practiced in Judea in the time of Jesus under the name “Pharisaism” according to Rabbi Louis Finkelstein, head of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, and all the other most competent and qualified recognized authorities on the subject.

The form of religious worship known as “Pharisaism” in Judea in the time of Jesus was a religious practice based exclusively upon the Talmud. The Talmud in the time of Jesus was the Magna Charta, the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights, ALL ROLLED INTO ONE, of those who practiced “Pharisaism”. The Talmud today occupies the same relative position with respect to those who profess “Judaism”. The Talmud today virtually exercises totalitarian dictatorship over the lives of so-called or self-styled “Jews” whether they are aware of that fact or not. Their spiritual leaders make no attempt to conceal the control they exercise over the lives of so-called or self-styled “Jews”. They extend their authority far beyond the legitimate limits of spiritual matters. Their authority has no equal outside religion.

The role of the Talmud plays in “Judaism” as it is practiced today is officially stated by the eminent Rabbi Morris N. Kertzer, the Director of Inter-religious Activities of the North American Jewish Committee and the President of the Jewish Chaplains Association of the Armed Forces of the United States. In his present capacity as official spokesman for the American Jewish Committee, the self-styled “Vatican of Judaism”, Rabbi Morris N. Kertzer wrote a most revealing and comprehensive article with the title, “What is a Jew” which was published as a feature article in “Look” Magazine in the June 17, 1952 issue. In that article Rabbi Morris N. Kertzer evaluated the significance of the Talmud to “Judaism” today. In that illuminating treatise on that important subject by the most qualified authority, at the time, Rabbi Morris N. Kertzer stated:

“The Talmud consists of 63 books of legal, ethical and historical writings of the ancient rabbis. It was edited five centuries after the birth of Jesus. It is a compendium of law and lore. IT IS THE LEGAL CODE WHICH FORMS THE BASIS OF JEWISH RELIGIOUS LAW AND IT IS THE TEXTBOOK USED IN THE TRAINING OF RABBIS.” (emphasis supplied).

In view of this official evaluation of the importance of the Talmud in the practice of “Judaism” today by the highest body of so-called or self-styled “Jews” in the world it is very necessary at this time, my dear Dr. Goldstein, to inquire a little further into the subject of the Talmud. In his lifetime the eminent Michael Rodkinson, the assumed name of a so-called or self-styled “Jew” who was one of the world’s great authorities on the Talmud, wrote “History of the Talmud.” This great classic on the subject was written by Michael Rodkinson in collaboration with the celebrated Rabbi Isaac M. Wise. In his “History of the Talmud” Michael Rodkinson, on page 70, states:

“Is the literature that Jesus was familiar with in his early years yet in existence in the world? Is it possible for us to get at it? Can we ourselves review the ideas, the statements, the modes of reasoning and thinking, ON MORAL AND RELIGIOUS SUBJECTS, which were current in his time, and MUST HAVE BEEN EVOLVED BY HIM DURING THOSE THIRTY SILENT YEARS WHEN HE WAS PONDERING HIS FUTURE MISSION? To such inquirers the learned class of Jewish rabbis ANSWER BY HOLDING UP THE TALMUD. Here, say they, is THE SOURCE FROM WHENCE JESUS OF NAZARETH DREW THE TEACHINGS WHICH ENABLED HIM TO REVOLUTIONIZE THE WORLD; and the question becomes, therefor, an interesting one TO EVERY CHRISTIAN. What is the Talmud? THE TALMUD, THEN, IS THE WRITTEN FORM OF THAT WHICH, IN THE TIME OF JESUS WAS CALLED THE TRADITION OF THE ELDERS AND TO WHICH HE MAKES FREQUENT ALLUSIONS. What sort of book is it? (emphasis supplied)

Stimulated by that invitation every Christian worthy of the name should immediately take the trouble to seek the answer to that “interesting” question “to every Christian”. My dear Dr. Goldstein, your articles do not indicate whether you have taken the time and the trouble to personally investigate “what sort of book” the Talmud is either before or after your conversion to Catholicism. Have you ever done so? If you have done so what is the conclusion you have reached regarding “what sort of book” the Talmud is? What is your personal unbiased and unprejudiced opinion of the Talmud? Is it consistent with your present views as a devout Roman Catholic and a tried and true Christian? Can you spare a few moments to drop me a few lines on your present views?

In case you have never had the opportunity to investigate the contents of the “63 books” of the Talmud so well summarized by Rabbi Morris N. Kertzer in his illuminated article “What is a Jew”, previously quoted, may I here impose upon your precious time to quote a few passages for you until you find the time to conveniently investigate the Talmud’s contents personally. If I can be of any assistance to you in doing so please do not hesitate to let me know in what manner you can use my help.

From the Birth of Jesus until this day there have never been recorded more vicious and vile libelous blasphemies of Jesus, or Christians and the Christian faith by anyone, anywhere or anytime than you will find between the covers of the infamous “63 books” which are “the legal code which forms the basis of Jewish religious law” as well as the “textbook used in the training of rabbis”. The explicit and implicit irreligious character and implications of the contents of the Talmud will open your eyes as they have never been opened before. The Talmud reviles Jesus, Christians and the Christian faith as the priceless spiritual and cultural heritage of Christians has never been reviled before or since the Talmud was completed in the 5th century. You will have to excuse the foul, obscene, indecent, lewd and vile language you will see here as verbatim quotations from the official unabridged translation of the Talmud into English. Be prepared for a surprise.

In the year 1935 the international hierarchy of so-called or self-styled “Jews” for the first time in history published an official unabridged translation of the complete Talmud in the English language with complete footnotes. What possessed them to make this translation into English is one of the unsolved mysteries. It was probably done because so many so-called or self-styled “Jews” of the younger generation were unable to read the Talmud in the many ancient languages in which the original “63 books” of the Talmud were first composed by their authors in many lands between 200 B.C. and 500 A.D.

The international hierarchy of so-called or self-styled “Jews” selected the most learned scholars to make this official translation of the Talmud into English. These famous scholars also prepared official footnotes explaining unabridged translation of the Talmud into English where they were required. This official unabridged translation of the Talmud into English with the official footnotes was printed in London in 1935 by the Soncino Press. It has been always referred to as the Soncino Edition of the Talmud. A very limited number of the Soncino Edition were printed. They were not made available to any purchaser. The Soncino Edition of the Talmud is to be found in the Library of Congress and the New York Public Library. A set of the Soncino Edition of the Talmud has been available to me for many years. They have become rare “collector’s items” by now.

The Soncino Edition of the Talmud with its footnotes is like a double-edged sword. It teaches the Talmud to countless millions of the younger generation of so-called or self-styled “Jews” who are not able to read the Talmud in the many ancient languages in which the Talmud was written by its authors between 200 B.C. and 500 A.D. It also teaches Christians what the Talmud has to say about Jesus, About Christians and about the Christian faith. Someday this is bound to back-fire. Christians will some day challenge the assertion that the Talmud is the “sort of book” from which Jesus allegedly “drew the teachings which enabled him to revolutionize the world” on “moral and religious subjects”. The rumbling is already heard in places.

Verbatim quotations from the Soncino Edition of the Talmud are required to illustrate the enormity of the Talmud’s iniquity. My comments with verbatim quotations will prove inadequate to do that. In spite of the low language I will of necessity therefore include in this letter to you I have no compunctions in the matter because the United States Post Office authorities do not bar the Soncino Edition of the Talmud from the mails. Nevertheless I apologize in advance for the language which will of necessity appear in this letter to you. You now understand.

The official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud published in 1935 was “Translated into English with Notes, Glossary and Indices” by such eminent Talmudic scholars as Rabbi Dr. I. Epstein, Rabbi Dr. Samuel Daiches, Rabbi Dr. Israel W. Slotki, M.A., Litt.D., The Reverend Dr. A. Cohen, M.A.’, Ph.D., Maurice Simon, M.A., and the Very Reverend The Chief Rabbi Dr. J.H. Hertz wrote the “Foreword” for the Soncino Edition of the Talmud. The Very Reverend Rabbi Hertz was at the time the Chief Rabbi of England.

The following are but a few of the many similar quotations with footnotes from the Soncino Edition of the Talmud, the “sort of book” from which Jesus allegedly “drew the teachings which enabled him to revolutionize the world” on “moral and religious” subjects:

(Book)

SANHEDRIN, 55b-55a: “What is meant by this? – Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that (2) What is the basis of their dispute? – Rab maintains that only he who is able to engage in sexual intercourse, may, as the passive subject of pederasty throw guilty (upon the actual offender); whilst he who is unable to engage in sexual intercourse cannot be a passive subject of pederasty (in that respect) (3). But Samuel maintains: Scriptures writes, (And thou shalt not lie with mankind) as with the lyings of a woman (4). It has been taught in accordance with Rab: Pederasty at the age of nine years and a day; (55a) (he) who commits bestiality, whether naturally or unnaturally: or a woman who causes herself to be beastially abused, whether naturally or unnaturally, is liable to punishment (5).”

(footnotes) “(1) The reference is to the passive subject of sodomy. As stated in supra 54a, guilt is incurred by the active participant even if the former be a minor; i.e., less than thirteen years old. Now, however, it is stated that within this age a distinction is drawn. (2) Rab makes nine years the minimum; but if one committed sodomy with a child of lesser age, no guilt is incurred. Samuel makes three the minimum. (3) At nine years a male attains sexual matureness. (4) Lev XVIII, 22 (5) Rashi reads (“xxx”) (Hebrew characters, Ed.) instead of (“zzz”) (Hebrew characters, Ed.) in our printed texts. A male, aged nine years and a day, who commits etc. There are thus three distinct clauses in this Baraitha. The first-a male aged nine years and a day – refers to the passive subject of pederasty, the punishment being incurred by the adult offender. This must be its meaning: because firstly, the active offender is never explicitly designated as a male, it being understood, just as the Bible states, Thou shalt not lie with mankind, where only the sex of the passive participant is mentioned; and secondly, if the age reference is to the active party, the guilt being incurred by the passive adult party, why single out pederasty: in all crimes of incest, the passive adult does not incur guilt unless the other party is at least nine years and a day? Hence the Baraitha supports Rab’s contention that nine years (and a day) is the minimum age of the passive partner for the adult to be liable.” (emphasis in original, Ed.)

Before giving any more verbatim quotations from the “sort of book” from which it is falsely alleged Jesus “drew the teachings which enabled him to revolutionize the world” on “moral and religious subjects” I wish to here again recall to your attention the official statement by Rabbi Morris N. Kertzer in `Look’ Magazine for June 17, 1952. In that official statement made by Rabbi Morris N. Kertzer on behalf of The American Jewish Committee, self- styled “The Vatican of Judaism”, informed the 20,000,000 readers of “Look’ magazine that the Talmud “IS THE LEGAL CODE WHICH FORMS THE BASIS OF JEWISH RELIGIOUS LAW AND IT IS THE TEXTBOOK USED IN THE TRAINING OF RABBIS”. Please bear this in mind as you read further.

Before continuing I wish also to call your attention to another feature. Confirming the official view of Rabbi Morris N. Kertzer, the New York `Times’ on May 20, 1954 ran a news item under the headline “Rabbis Plan a Fund to Endow Two Chairs”. The news item itself ran as follows: “Special to the New York Times, Uniontown, Pa. May 19 – Plans for raising $500,000, for the creation of two endowed chairs at the `Jewish Theological Seminary of America’ were announced today at the fifty-forth annual convention of the `Rabbinical Assembly of America’. THE PROFESSORSHIPS WOULD BE KNOWN AS THE LOUIS GINSBERG CHAIR IN TALMUD…” This is further proof that the Talmud is not yet quite a dead-letter in the “TRAINING OF RABBIS”. Is further proof needed on that question?

The world’s leading authorities on the Talmud confirm that the official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud translated into English follows the original texts with great exactness. It is almost a word-for-word translation of the original texts. In his famous classic “The History of the Talmud Michael Rodkinson, the leading authority on the Talmud, in collaboration with the celebrated Reverend Dr. Isaac M. Wise states:

With the conclusion of the first volume of this work at the beginning of the twentieth century, we would invite the reader to take a glance over the past of the Talmud, in which he will see… that not only was the Talmud not destroyed, but was so saved that NOT A SINGLE LETTER OF IT IS MISSING; and now IT IS FLOURISHING TO SUCH A DEGREE AS CANNOT BE FOUND IN ITS PAST HISTORY…THE TALMUD IS ONE OF THE WONDERS OF THE WORLD. During the twenty centuries of its existence…IT SURVIVED IN ITS ENTIRETY, and not only has the power of its foes FAILED TO DESTROY EVEN A SINGLE LINE, but it has not even been able materially to weaken its influence for any length of time. IT STILL DOMINATES THE MINDS OF A WHOLE PEOPLE, WHO VENERATE ITS CONTENTS AS DIVINE TRUTH… The colleges for the study of the Talmud are increasing almost in every place where Israel dwells, especially in this country where millions are gathered for the funds of the two colleges, the Hebrew Union College of Cincinnati and the Jewish Theological Seminary of America in New York, in which the chief study is the Talmud… There are also in our city houses of learning (Jeshibath) for the study of the Talmud in the lower East Side, where many young men are studying the Talmud every day.”

This “divine truth” which “a whole people venerate” of which “not a single letter of it is missing” and today “is flourishing to such a degree as cannot be found in its history” is illustrated by the additional verbatim quotations which follow:

(Book)

SANHEDRIN, 55b: “A maiden three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. The penalty of adultery may be incurred through her; (if a niddah) she defiles him who has connection with her, so that he in turn defiles that upon which he lies, as a garment which has lain upon (a person afflicted with gonorrhea).” (emphasis in original text of Soncino Edition, Ed.)

(footnotes) “(2) His wife derives no pleasure from this, and hence there is no cleaving. (3) A variant reading of this passage is: Is there anything permitted to a Jew which is forbidden to a heathen. Unnatural connection is permitted to a Jew. (4) By taking the two in conjunction, the latter as illustrating the former, we learn that the guilt of violating the injunction `to his wife but not to his neighbor’s wife’ is incurred only for natural but not for unnatural intercourse.” (emphasis in original, Ed.)

(Book)

SANHEDRIN, 69a ” `A man’; from this I know the law only with respect to a man: whence do I know it of one aged nine years and a day who is capable of intercourse? From the verse, And `if a man’? (2)-He replied: Such a minor can produce semen, but cannot beget therewith; for it is like the seed of cereals less than a third grown (3).”

(footnotes) (2) `And’ (`) indicates an extension of the law, and is here interpreted to include a minor aged nine years and a day. (3) Such cereals contain seed, which if sown, however, will not grow.”

(Book)

SANHEDRIN, 69b “Our rabbis taught: If a woman sported lewdly with her young son (a minor), and he committed the first stage of cohabitation with her, -Beth Shammai say, he thereby renders her unfit for the priesthood (1). Beth Hillel declare her fit…All agree that the connection of a boy nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not (2); their dispute refers only to one who is eight years old.

(footnotes) (1) i.e., she becomes a harlot whom a priest may not marry (Lev XXL,7.). (2) so that if he was nine years and a day or more, Beth Hillel agree that she is invalidated from the priesthood; whilst if he was less than eight, Beth Shammai agree that she is not.”

(Book)

KETHUBOTH, 5b. “The question was asked: Is it allowed (15) to perform the first marital act on the Sabbath? (16). Is the blood (in the womb) stored up (17), or is it the result of a wound? (18).

(footnotes) “(15) Lit., `how is it’? (16) When the intercourse could not take place before the Sabbath (Tosaf) (17) And the intercourse would be allowed, since the blood flows out of its own accord, no would having been made. (18) Lit., or is it wounded? And the intercourse would be forbidden.”

(Book)

KETHUBOTH, 10a-10b. “Someone came before Rabban Gamaliel the son of Rabbi (and) said to him, `my master I have had intercourse (with my newly wedded wife) and I have not found any blood (7). She (the wife) to him, `My master, I am still a virgin’. He (then) said to them; Bring me two handmaids, one (who is) a virgin and one who had intercourse with a man. They brought to him (two such handmaids), and he placed them on a cask of wine. (In the case of ) the one who was no more a virgin its smell (1) went through (2), (in the case of) the virgin the smell did not go through (3). He (then) placed this one (the young wife) also (on the cask of wine), and its smell (4) did not go through. He (then) said to him: Go, be happy with thy bargain (7). But he should have examined her from the beginning (8).”

(footnotes) “(1) i.e., the smell of wine. (2) One could smell the wine from the mouth (Rashi). (3) One could not smell the wine from the mouth. (4) i.e., the smell of wine. (5) Rabban Gamaliel (6) To the husband. (7) The test showed that the wife was a virgin. (8) Why did he first have to experiment with the two handmaids.”

(Book)

KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. “Rabba said, It means (5) this: When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (6), it is as if one puts the finger in the eye (7), but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown up woman, he makes her as `a girl who is injured by a piece of wood’ “.

(footnotes) “(5). Lit., `says’. (6) Lit., `here’, that is, less than three years old. (7) Tears come to the eyes again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years.”

(Book)

KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. “Rab Judah said that Rab said: A small boy who has intercourse with a grown up woman makes her (as though she were ) injured by a piece of wood (1). Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood.”

(footnotes) “(1) Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood.”

(Book)

HAYORATH, 4a. “We learnt: (THE LAW CONCERNING THE MENSTRUANT OCCURS IN THE TORAH BUT IF A MAN HAS INTERCOURSE WITH A WOMAN THAT AWAITS A DAY CORRESPONDING TO A DAY HE IS EXEMPT. But why? Surely (the law concerning) a woman that awaits a day corresponding to a day is mentioned in the Scriptures: He hath made naked her fountain. But, surely it is written, (1)- They might rule that in the natural way even the first stage of contact is forbidden; and in an unnatural way, however, is (that the ruling might have been permitted) (3) even in the natural way (4) alleging (that the prohibition of) the first stage (5) has reference to a menstruant woman only (6). And if you prefer I might say: The ruling may have been that a woman is not regarded as a zabah (7) except during the daytime because it is written, all the days of her issue (8).” (emphasis appears in Soncino Edition original, Ed.)

(footnotes) “(13) Lev. XV, 28. (14) Cf. supra p. 17, n. 10. Since she is thus Biblically considered unclean how could a court rule that one having intercourse with her is exempt? (15) Lev XX, 18. (1) Ibid. 13. The plural “xxxx” (Hebrew characters, Ed.) implies natural, and unnatural intercourse. (2) Why then was the case of `a woman who awaits a day corresponding to a day’ given as an illustration when the case of a menstruant, already mentioned, would apply the same illustration. (3) The first stage of contact. (4) In the case of one `who awaits a day corresponding to a day’; only consummation of coition being forbidden in her case. (5) Cf. Lev XX, 18. (6) Thus permitting a forbidden act which the Sadducees do not admit. (7) A woman who has an issue of blood not in the time of her menstruation, and is subject to certain laws of uncleanness and purification (Lev XV, 25ff). (8) Lev XV, 26. Emphasis being laid on days.”

(Book)

ABODAH ZARAH, 36b-37a. “R. Naham b. Isaac said: They decreed in connection with a heathen child that it would cause defilement by seminal emission (2) so that an Israelite child should not become accustomed to commit pederasty with it…From what age does a heathen child cause defilement by seminal emission? From the age of nine years and one day. (37a) for inasmuch as he is then capable of the sexual act he likewise defiles by emission. Rabina said: It is therefore to be concluded that a heathen girl (communicates defilement) from the age of three years and one day, for inasmuch as she is then capable of the sexual act she likewise defiles by a flux.

(footnotes) (2). Even through he suffered from no issue.

(Book)

SOTAH, 26b. “R. Papa said: It excludes an animal, because there is not adultery in connection with an animal (4). Raba of Parazika (5) asked R. Ashi, Whence is the statement which the Rabbis made that there is no adultery in connection with an animal? Because it is written, Thou shalt not bring the hire of a harlot or the wages of a dog etc.; (6) and it has been taught: The hire of a dog (7) and the wages of a harlot (8) are permissible, as it is said, Even both of these (9) – the two (specified texts are abominations) but not four (10)…As lying with mankind. (12) But, said Raba, it excludes the case where he warned her against contact of the bodies (13). Abaye said to him, That is merely an obscene act (and not adultery), and did the All-Merciful prohibit (a wife to her husband) for an obscene act?” (emphasis in the original text, Ed.)

(footnotes) “(4) She would not be prohibited to her husband for such an act. (5) farausag near Baghdad v. BB. (Sonc. Ed.) p. 15, n.4. He is thus distinguished from the earlier Rabbi of that name. (6) Deut. XXIII, 19. (7) Money given by a man to a harlot to associate with his dog. Such an association is not legal adultery. (8) If a man had a female slave who was a harlot and he exchanged her for an animal, it could be offered. (9) Are an abomination unto the Lord (ibid). (10) Viz., the other two mentioned by the Rabbi. (11) In Num. V. 13. since the law applies to a man who is incapable. (12) Lev. XVIII, 22. The word for `lying’ is in the plural and is explained as denoting also unnatural intercourse. (13) With the other man, although there is no actual coition.” (emphasis appears in original Soncino Edition, Ed.)

(Book)

YEBAMOTH, 55b. “Raba said; for what purpose did the All- Merciful write `carnally’ in connection with the designated bondmaid (9), a married woman (10< and a sotah (11)? That in connection with the designated bondmaid (is required) as has just been explained (12). That in connection with a married woman excludes intercourse with a relaxed membrum (13). This is a satisfactory interpretation in accordance with the view of him who maintains that if one cohabited with forbidden relatives with relaxed membrum he is exonerated (14); what, however, can be said, according to him who maintains (that for such an act one is) guilty? The exclusion is rather that of intercourse with a dead woman (15). Since it might have been assumed that, as (a wife), even after her death, is described as his kin (16), one should be guilty for (intercourse with) her (as for that) with a married woman, hence we are taught (that one is exonerated).

(footnotes) (9) Lev. XIX,20. (10) Ibid. XVIII,20 (11) Num. V, 13. (12) SUPRA 55a. (13) Since no fertilization can possibly occur. (14) Shebu., 18a, Sanh. 55a (15) Even though she dies as a married woman. (16) In Lev. XXI, 2. where the text enumerates the dead relatives for whom a priest may defile himself. As was explained, supra 22b, his kin refers to one’s wife.” (emphasis in Soncino Edition original, Ed.)

(Book)

YEBAMOTH, 103a-103b. “When the serpent copulated with Eve (14) with lust. The lust of the Israelites who stood at Mount Sinai (16) came to an end, the lust of idolators who did not stand at Mount Sinai did not come to an end.”

(footnotes) “(14) In the Garden of Eden, according to tradition. (15) i.e., the human species. (16) And experienced the purifying influence of divine Revelation.”

(Book)

YEBAMOTH, 63a. “R. Eleazar further stated: What is meant by the Scriptural text, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh (5)? This teaches that Adam had intercourse with every beast and animal but found no satisfaction until he cohabited with Eve.

(footnotes) “(5) Gen. II, 23. emphasis on This is now.” (emphasis appears in original Sonsino Edition, Ed.)

(Book)

YEBAMOTH, 60b. “As R. Joshua b. Levi related: `There was a certain town in the Land of Israel the legitimacy of whose inhabitants was disputed, and Rabbi sent R. Ramanos who conducted an inquiry and found in it the daughter of a proselyte who was under the age of three years and one day (14), and Rabbi declared her eligible to live with a priest (15).”

(footnotes) “(13) A proselyte under the age of three years and one day may be married by a priest. (14) And was married to a priest. (15) i.e., permitted to continue to live with her husband.”

(Book)

YEBAMOTH, 59b. “R. Shimi b. Hiyya stated: A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to marry a priest (4). Likewise it was taught: A woman who had intercourse with that which is no human being (5), though she is in consequence subject to the penalty of stoning (6), is nevertheless permitted to marry a priest (7).

(footnotes) “(4) Even a High Priest. The result of such intercourse being regarded as a mere wound, and the opinion that does not regard an accidentally injured hymen as a disqualification does not so regard such an intercourse either. (5) A beast. (6) If the offense was committed in the presence of witnesses after due warning. (7) In the absence of witnesses and warning.”

(Book)

YEBAMOTH, 12b “R. Bebai recited before R. Naham: Three (categories of) woman may (7) use an absorbent (8) in their marital intercourse (9), a minor, a pregnant woman and a nursing woman. The minor (10) because (otherwise) she might (11) become pregnant, and as a result (11) might die…And what is the age of such a minor? (14). From the age of eleven years and one day until the age of twelve years and one day. One who is under (15), or over this age (16) must carry on her marital intercourse in the usual manner.”

(footnotes) “(7) (so Rashi. R. Tam; Should use, v.Tosaf s.v.) (8) Hackled wool or flax (9) To prevent conception (10) May use an absorbent. (11) Lit., `perhaps’. (14) Who is capable of conception but exposed thereby to the danger of death. (15) When no conception is possible. (16) When pregnancy involves no fatal consequences.”

(Book)

YEBAMOTH, 59b. “When R. Dimi came (8) he related: It once happened at Haitalu (9) that while a young woman was sweeping the floor (10) a village dog (11) covered her from the rear (12) and Rabbi permitted her to marry a priest. Samuel said: Even a High Priest.

(footnotes) “(8) From Palestine to Babylon (9) (Babylonian form for Aitulu, modern Aiterun N.W. of Kadesh, v. S. Klein, Beitrage, p. 47). (10) Lit., `house’. (11) Or `big hunting dog’ (Rashi), `ferocious dog’ (Jast.), `small wild dog’ (Aruk). (12) A case of unnatural intercourse.

(Book)

KETHUBOTH, 6b. “Said he to him: Not like those Babylonians who are not skilled in moving aside. (7), but there are some who are skilled in moving aside (8). If so, why (give the reason of) `anxious.? (10)- for one who is not skilled. (Then) let the[m] say: One who is skilled is allowed (to perform the first intercourse on Sabbath), one who is not skilled is forbidden? -Most (people) are skilled (11). Said Raba the son of R. Hanan to Abaye’ If this were so, then why (have) groomsmen (12) why (have) a sheet? (13)- He (Abaye) said to him: There (the groomsmen and the sheet are necessary) perhaps he will see and destroy (the tokens of her virginity) (14).

(footnotes) “(7) i.e., having intercourse with a virgin without causing a bleeding. (8) Thus no blood need come out, and `Let his head be cut off and let him not die!’ does not apply. (9) If the bridegroom is skilled in `moving sideways’. (10) He need not be anxious about the intercourse and should not be free from reading Shema’ on account of such anxiety. (11) Therefor the principle regarding `Let his head be cut off and let him not die!’ does not, as a rule, apply. (12) The groomsmen testify in case of need to the virginity of the bride. V. infra 12a. If the bridegroom will act in a manner that will cause no bleeding, the groomsmen will not be able to testify on the question of virginity. (13) To provide evidence of the virginity of the bride. Cf. Deut. XXII,17. (14) It may happen that he will act in the normal manner and cause bleeding but he will destroy the tokens and maintain that the bride was not a virgin; for this reason the above mentioned provisions are necessary. Where however he moved aside and made a false charge as to her virginity, the bride can plead that she is still a virgin (Rashi).”

After reading these verbatim quotations from the countless other similar quotations which you will find in the official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud in the English language are you of the opinion, my dear Dr. Goldstein, that the Talmud was the “sort of book” from which Jesus “drew the teachings which enabled him to revolutionize the world” on “moral and religious subjects”? You have read here verbatim quotations and official footnotes on a few of the many other subjects covered by the “63 books” of the Talmud. When you read them you must be prepared for a shock. I am surprised that the United States Post Office does not bar the Talmud from the mails. I hesitate to quote them in this letter.

In support of the contention by the top echelon among the outstanding authorities on this phase of the present status of the Talmud, further proof of the wide influence exerted by the Talmud upon the so-called or self-styled “Jews” is supplied by Rabbi Morris N. Kertzer’s article “What is a Jew” in the June 17, 1952 issue of `Look Magazine’. Rabbi Morris N. Kertzer’s article contains a lovely picture of a smiling man seated in a chair with a large opened book upon his lap. Seated around him on the floor are about a dozen smiling men and women. They are paying close attention to the smiling man in the chair with the opened book upon his lap. He is reading to the persons on the floor. He emphasizes what he is reading by gestures with one of his hands. Beneath this photograph of the group is the following explanation:

“ADULTS STUDY ANCIENT WRITINGS TOO. RABBI, IN THIS PICTURE, SEATED IN CHAIR, LEADS GROUP DISCUSSION OF TALMUD BEFORE EVENING PRAYER.” (emphasis supplied)

This picture and explanation indicate the extent the Talmud is the daily diet of so-called or self-styled “Jews” in this day and age. The Talmud is first taught to children of so-called or self- styled “Jews” as soon as they are able to read. Just as the Talmud is the “textbook by which rabbis are trained” so is the Talmud also the textbook by which the rank-and-file of the so-called or self- styled “Jews” are “trained” to think from their earliest age. In the translation of the Talmud with its texts edited, corrected and formulated by the eminent Michael Rodkinson, with its first edition revised and corrected by the celebrated Reverend Dr. Isaac M. Wise, on page XI, it states:

“THE MODERN JEW IS THE PRODUCT OF THE TALMUD” (emphasis supplied)

To the average Christian the word “Talmud” is just another word associated by them with the form of religious worship practiced in their synagogues by so-called or self-styled “Jews”. Many Christians have never heard of the Talmud. Very few Christians are informed on the contents of the Talmud. Some may believe the Talmud to be an integral part of the religious worship known to them as “Judaism”. It suggests a sort of bible or religious text book. It is classed as a spiritual manual. But otherwise few if any Christians have an understanding of the contents of the Talmud and what it means in the daily lives of so-called or self-styled “Jews”. As an illustration, my dear Dr. Goldstein, how many Christians have any conception of the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer recited in synagogues on the Day of Atonement?

In Volume VIII of the Jewish Encyclopedia on page 539 found in the Library of Congress, the New York Public Library and libraries of all leading cities, will be found the official translation into English of the prayer known as the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer. It is the prologue of the Day of Atonement services in the synagogues. IT is recited three times by the standing congregation in concert with chanting rabbis at the alter. After the recital of the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer the Day of Atonement religious ceremonies follow immediately. The Day of Atonement religious observances are the highest holy days of the so-called or self-styled “Jews” and are celebrated as such throughout the world. The official translation into English of the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer follows”

“ALL VOWS, OBLIGATIONS, OATHS, ANATHEMAS, whether called `konam’, `konas’, or by any other name, WHICH WE MAY VOW, OR SWEAR, OR PLEDGE, OR WHEREBY WE MAY BE BOUND, FROM THIS DAY OF ATONEMENT UNTO THE NEXT, (whose happy coming we await), we do repent. MAY THEY BE DEEMED ABSOLVED, FORGIVEN, ANNULLED, AND VOID AND MADE OF NO EFFECT; THEY SHALL NOT BIND US NOR HAVE POWERS OVER US. THE VOWS SHALL NOT BE RECKONED VOWS; THE OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT BE OBLIGATORY; NOR THE OATHS BE OATHS.” (emphasis supplied)

The implications, inferences and innuendoes of the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer are referred to in the Talmud in the Book of Nedarim, 23a-23b as follows:

(Book)

“And he who desires that NONE OF HIS VOWS MADE DURING THE YEAR SHALL BE VALID, let him stand at the beginning of the year and declare, `EVERY VOW WHICH I MAKE IN THE FUTURE SHALL BE NULL (1). (HIS VOWS ARE THEN INVALID,) PROVIDING THAT HE REMEMBERS THIS AT THE TIME OF THE VOW.” (emphasis in original and supplied, Ed.)

(footnotes) “(1) This may have provided a support for the custom of reciting Kol Nidre (a formula for dispensation of vows) prior to the Evening Service of the Day of Atonement (Ran)…Though the beginning of the year (New Year) is mentioned here, the Day of Atonement was probably chosen on account of its great solemnity. But Kol Nidre as part of the ritual IS LATER THAN THE TALMUD, and, as seen from the following statement of R. Huna b. Hinene, THE LAW OF REVOCATION IN ADVANCE WAS NOT MADE PUBLIC. (emphasis supplied and in original text, Ed.)

The greatest study of the “Kol Nidre” (all Vows) prayer was made by the eminent psycho-analyst Professor Theodor Reik, the celebrated pupil of the famous Dr. Sigmund Freud. The analysis of the historic, religious and psychological background of the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer by Professor Reik presents the Talmud in its true perspective. This important study is contained in Professor Reik’s “The Ritual, Psycho-Analytical Studies”. In the chapter on the Talmud, on page 168, Professor Reik states:

“THE TEXT WAS TO THE EFFECT THAT ALL OATHS WHICH BELIEVERS TAKE BETWEEN ONE DAY OF ATONEMENT AND THE NEXT DAY OF ATONEMENT ARE DECLARED INVALID.” (emphasis added)

Before explaining to you how the present wording of the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer was introduced into the Day of Atonement synagogue ceremonies, my dear Dr. Goldstein, I would like to quote a passage to you from the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia. The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia confirms the fact that the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer has no spiritual value as might be believed because it is recited in synagogues on the Day of Atonement as the prologue of the religious ceremonies which follow it. The secular significance of the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer is indicated forcefully by the analysis in the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia. In Volume VI, on page 441, it states:

“The Kol Nidre HAS NOTHING WHATEVER TO DO WITH THE ACTUAL IDEA OF THE DAY OF ATONE- MENT…it attained to extraordinary solemnity and popularity by reason of the fact that it was THE FIRST PRAYER RECITED ON THIS HOLIEST OF DAYS.”

My dear Dr. Goldstein, prepare for the shock of your life. Compelled by what you may now read here about the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer you must be shocked to learn that many Christian churches actually “peal their bells” on the Day of Atonement in celebration of that holy day for so-called or self- styled “Jews.” How stupid can the Christian clergy get? From what I have learned after a cursory inquiry I am unable to say whether it was a case of stupidity or cupidity. With what you already know, together with what [you] will additionally know before you finish this letter, you will be able to judge for yourself whether it was stupidity or cupidity. There is not one single fact in this entire letter which every graduate of a theological seminary did not have the opportunity to learn.

The following news item was featured in the New York `World Telegram’ on October 7th only a few days ago. Under a prominent headline “JEWISH HOLIDAYS TO END AT SUNDOWN” the New York `World Telegram’ gave great prominence to the following story:

“Synagogues and temples throughout the city were crowded yesterday as the 24 hour fast began. Dr. Normal Salit, head of the Synagogue Council of America, representing the three major Jewish bodies, had called on other faiths TO JOIN THE FAST… Cutting across religious lines, MANY PROTESTANT CHURCHES IN THE CITY PEALED THEIR BELLS LAST NIGHT TO SOUND THE KOL NIDRE, TRADITIONAL MELODY USED AT THE START OF YOM KIPPUR. THE GESTURE OF GOOD- WILL WAS RECOMMENDED BY THE MANHATTAN OFFICE OF THE PROTESTANT COUNCIL” (emphasis supplied).

That just about “tops” anything I have ever had come to my attention revealing the ignorance and indifference of the Christian clergy to the hazards today facing the Christian faith. From my personal contacts with the Manhattan Office of the Protestant Council in the recent past I hold out very little hope for any constructive contribution they can make to the common defense of the Christian faith against its dedicated enemies. In each instance they buckled under the “pressure” exerted upon them by the “contacts” for so-called or self-styled “Jews”. If it was not so tragic it would be comic. It was a joke indeed but the joke was on the Christian clergy. Ye Gods! “Many” Christian churches “pealed their bells”, as the Protestant Council reports the event, “TO SOUND THE KOL NIDRE, TRADITIONAL MELODY USED AT THE START OF YOM KIPPUR”. Just where does betrayal of a trust and breach of faith begin?

The present wording of the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer dates from the 11th century. A political reversal in eastern Europe compelled the so-called or self-styled “Jews” in eastern Europe to adopt the present wording of the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer. That story involves the history of the so-called or self-styled “Jews. Before relating here as briefly as possible the history of the so- called or self-styled “Jews” of eastern Europe I would like to quote here another short passage from the Jewish Encyclopedia. In analyzing the course of history which resulted in the present wording of the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer the Jewish Encyclopedia in Volume VII, on page 540, states:

“AN IMPORTANT ALTERATION IN THE WORDING of the `Kol Nidre’ was made by Rashi’s son-in-law, Meir ben Samuel, WHO CHANGED THE ORIGINAL PHRASE `FROM THE LAST DAY OF ATONEMENT TO THIS ONE’ to `FROM THIS DAY OF ATONEMENT UNTIL THE NEXT’ “. (emphasis supplied)

You will agree, my dear Dr. Goldstein, that Meir ben Samuel knew what he was doing. The wording of that altered version of the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer makes the recital of the prayer a release during the coming year from any obligations to respect any oath, vow or pledge during the coming year. Like any one-year license obtained from the Federal, State or Municipal governments, the altered version of the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer extends immunity in advance for one year from all obligations to observe the terms of oaths, vows and pledges made in the year following the date of the Day of Atonement when the prayer was recited. Each year however it becomes necessary to renew this “license” which automatically revokes in advance any oath, vow or pledge made during the next twelve months, by again appearing in a synagogue on the next Day of Atonement and reciting the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer again. Do you approve of this?

The passage in the Talmud referring to “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer certifies to several serious situations. It certifies that “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer was added as a prologue to the Day of Atonement religious services long after the completion of the Talmud between 500 A.D. – 1000 A.D. by the statement, “as part of the ritual is later than the Talmud.” It confirms that Meir ben Samuel who authored the present altered version of the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer lived in the 11th century. Furthermore, the so- called or self-styled “Jews” in eastern Europe believed it served their purpose better to keep secret from their Christian conquerors their attitude on oaths, vows and pledges, “the law of revocation in advance was not made public.”

With a complete and accurate knowledge of the origin and history of the so-called or self-styled “Jews” in eastern Europe, my dear Dr. Goldstein, it is quite impossible for yourself or for anybody to intelligently understand the harmful influence the Talmud has exerted for ten centuries , and the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer for seven centuries upon the course of world history. These two little known factors are the hub and the spokes of the “big wheel” rolling merrily along the road to complete world domination in the not distant future, without arousing suspicion, and wearing the innocent disguise of an alleged religious belief as their only defense mechanism. This insidious intrigue creates a most effective camouflage for the conspirators. The virility of their plot presents a problem in the defense of the political, economic, social and cultural ideologies developed under a Christian civilization.

You will probably also be an astonished as the 150,000,000 Christians years ago when I electrified the nation with the first publication by me of the facts disclosed by my many years of research into the origin and the history of the so-called or self- styled “Jews” in eastern Europe. My many years of intensive research established beyond the question of any doubt, contrary to the generally accepted belief held by Christians, that the so-called or self-styled “Jews” in eastern Europe at any time in their history in eastern Europe were never the legendary “lost ten tribes” of Bible lore. That historic fact is incontrovertible.

Relentless research established as equally true that the so- called or self-styled “Jews” in eastern Europe at no time in their history could be correctly regarded as the direct lineal descendants of the legendary “lost ten tribes” of Bible lore. The so-called or self-styled “Jews” in eastern Europe in modern history cannot legitimately point to a single ancient ancestor who ever set even a foot on the soil of Palestine in the era of Bible history. Research also revealed that the so-called or self-styled “Jews” in eastern Europe were never “Semites”, are not “Semites” now, nor can they ever be regarded as “Semites” at any future time by any stretch of the imagination. Exhaustive research also irrevocably rejects as a fantastic fabrication the generally accepted belief by Christians that the so-called or self-styled “Jews” in eastern Europe are the legendary “Chosen People” so very vocally publicized by the Christian clergy form their pulpits.

Maybe you can explain to me, my dear Dr. Goldstein, the reason why and just how the origin and the history of the Khazars and Khazar Kingdom was so well concealed from the world for so many centuries? What secret mysterious power has been able for countless generations to keep the origin and the history of the Khazars and Khazar Kingdom out of history text-books and out of class-room courses in history throughout the world? The origin and history of the Khazars and Khazar Kingdom are certainly incontestable historical facts. These incontestable historic facts also establish beyond any question of doubt the origin and history of the so-called or self-styled “Jews” in eastern Europe. The origin and history of the Khazars and Khazar kingdom and their relationship to the origin and early history of the so-called or self-styled “Jews” in eastern Europe was one of history’s best kept secrets until wide publicity was given in recent years to my research on this subject. Do you not think, my dear Dr. Goldstein, that it is time this whole subject was dragged out of its hiding place?

In the year 1948 in the Pentagon in Washington I addressed a large assembly of the highest ranking officers of the United States Army principally in the G2 branch of Military Intelligence on the highly explosive geopolitical situation in eastern Europe and the Middle East. Then as now that area of the world was a potential threat to the peace of the world and to the security of this nation I explained to them fully the origin of the Khazars and Khazar Kingdom. I felt then as I feel now that without a clear and comprehensive knowledge of that subject it is not possible to understand or to evaluate properly what has been taking place in the world since 1917, the year of the Bolshevik revolution in Russia. It is the “key” to that problem.

Upon the conclusion of my talk a very alert Lieutenant Colonel present at the meeting informed me that he was the head of the history department of one of the largest and highest scholastic rated institutions of higher education in the United States. He had taught history there for 16 years. He had recently been called back to Washington for further military service. To my astonishment he informed me that he had never in all his career as a history teachers or otherwise heard the word “khazar” before he heard me mention it there. That must give you some idea, my dear Dr. Goldstein, of how successful that mysterious secret power was with their plot to “block out” the origin and the history of the Khazars and Khazar Kingdom in order to conceal from the world and particularly Christians the true origin and the history of the so-called or self- styled “Jews” in eastern Europe.

The Russian conquest in the 10th-13th centuries of the little-known-to-history Khazars apparently ended the existence for all time of the little-known-to-history 800,000 square mile sovereign kingdom of the so-called or self-styled “Jews” in eastern Europe, known then as the Khazar Kingdom. Historians and theologians now agree that this political development was the reason for the “IMPORTANT CHANGE IN THE WORDING OF THE `KOL NIDRE’ by Meir ben Samuel in the 11th century, and for the policy adopted by the so-called or self-styled “Jews” that “THE LAW OF REVOCATION IN ADVANCE WAS NOT MADE PUBLIC”. Will you be patient with me while I review here as briefly as I can the history of that political emergence and disappearance of a nation from the pages of history?

Prior to the 10th century the Khazar Kingdom had already been reduced by Russian conquests to an area of about 800,000 square miles. As you can see on the map from the Jewish Encyclopedia [Reproduced in the book form of this tract, “Facts are Facts”] the territory of the Khazar Kingdom in the 10th century was still by far the largest of any nation in Europe. The population of the Khazar Kingdom was made up for the most part of Khazars with the addition of the remnants of the populations of the 25 peaceful agricultural nations which had inhabited this approximately 1,000,000 square miles before their conquest by the invading Khazars. In the 1st century B.C. the Khazars had invaded eastern Europe from their homeland in Asia. The Khazars invaded eastern Europe via the land route between the north end of the Caspian Sea and the south end of the Ural Mountains. (see map.)

The Khazars were not “Semites”. They were an Asiatic Mongoloid nation. They are classified by modern anthropologists as Turco-Finns racially. From time immemorial the homeland of the Khazars was in the heart of Asia. They were a very warlike nation. The Khazars were driven out of Asia finally by the nations in Asia with whom they were continually at war. The Khazars invaded eastern Europe to escape further defeats in Asia. The very warlike Khazars did not find it difficult to subdue and conquer the 25 peaceful agricultural nations occupying approximately 1,000,000 square miles in eastern Europe. In a comparatively short period the Khazars established the largest and most powerful kingdom in Europe, and probably the wealthiest also.

The Khazars were a pagan nation when they invaded eastern Europe. Their religious worship was a mixture of phallic worship and other forms of idolatrous worship practiced in Asia by pagan nations This form of worship continued until the 7th century. The vile forms of sexual excess indulged in by the Khazars as their form of religious worship produced a degree of moral degeneracy the Khazar’s king could not endure. In the 7th century King Bulan, ruler at that time of the Khazar Kingdom, decided to abolish the practice of phallic worship and other forms of idolatrous worship and make one of the three monotheistic religions, about which he knew very little, the new state religion. After a historic session with representatives of the three monotheistic religions King Bulan decided against Christian and Islam and selected as the future state religion as the religious worship then know as “Talmudism”, and now known and practiced as “Judaism”. This even is well documented in history.

King Bulan and his 4000 feudal nobles were promptly converted by rabbis imported from Babylonia for that event. Phallic worship and other forms of idolatry were thereafter forbidden. The Khazar kings invited large numbers of rabbis to come and open synagogues and schools to instruct the population in the new form of religious worship. It was now the state religion. The converted Khazars were the first population of so-called or self-styled “Jews’ in eastern Europe. So-called or self-styled “Jews” in eastern Europe after the conversion of the Khazars the descendants of the Khazars converted to “Talmudism”, or as it is now know “Judaism”, by the 7th century mass conversion of the Khazar population.

After the conversion of King Bulan none but a so-called or self-styled “Jew” could occupy the Khazar throne. The Khazar Kingdom became a virtual theocracy. The religious leaders were the civil administrators also. The religious leaders imposed the teachings of the Talmud upon the population as their guide to living. The ideologies of the Talmud became the axis of political, cultural, economic and social attitudes and activities throughout the Khazar kingdom. The Talmud provided civil and religious law.

It might be very interesting for you, my dear Dr. Goldstein, if you have the patience, to allow me to quote for you here form Volume IV, pages 1 to 5, of the Jewish Encyclopedia. The Jewish Encyclopedia refers to the Khazars as “Chazars”. The two spellings are optional according to the best authorities. The two are pronounced alike. Either Khazar or “Chazar” is pronounced like the first syllable of “costume” with the word “Czar” added onto it. It is correctly pronounced “cos(tume)Czar”. The Jewish Encyclopedia has five pages on the Khazars but I will skip through them:

I

“CHAZARS: A people of Turkish origin whose life and history are interwoven with THE VERY BEGINNINGS OF THE HISTORY OF THE JEWS OF RUSSIA … driven on by the nomadic tribes of the steppes and by THEIR OWN DESIRE FOR PLUNDER AND REVENGE …

In the second half of the sixth century the Chazars moved westward…The kingdom of the Chazars was firmly established in MOST OF SOUTH RUSSIA LONG BEFORE THE FOUNDATIONS OF THE RUSSIAN MONARCHY BY THE VARANGIAN (855) … At this time the kingdom of the Chazars stood at the height of its power AND WAS CONSTANTLY AT WAR … At the end of the eighth century … the chagan (king) of the Chazars and his grandees, TOGETHER WITH A LARGE NUMBER OF HIS HEATHEN PEOPLE, EMBRACED THE JEWISH RELIGION …

The Jewish population in the entire domain of the Chazars, in the period between the seventh and tenth centuries, MUST HAVE BEEN CONSIDERABLE … about THE NINTH CENTURY, IT APPEARS AS IF ALL THE CHAZARS WERE JEWS AND THAT THEY HAD BEEN CONVERTED TO JUDAISM ONLY A SHORT TIME BEFORE… It was one of the successors of Bulan named Obadiah, who regenerated the kingdom and STRENGTHENED THE JEWISH RELIGION. He invited Jewish scholars to settle in his dominions, and founded SYNAGOGUES AND SCHOOLS. The people were instructed in the bible, Mishnah, and the TALMUD and in the `divine service of the hazzanim’.. In their writings the CHAZARS USED THE HEBREW LETTERS … THE CHAZAR LANGUAGES PREDOMINATED… Obadiah was succeeded by his son Isaac; Isaac by his son Moses (or Manasseh II); the latter by his son Nisi; and Nisi by his son Aaron II.

King Joseph himself was a son of Aaron, AND ASCENDED THE THRONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CHAZARS RELATING TO SUCCESSION … The king had twenty-five wives, all of royal blood, and sixty concubines, all famous beauties. Each one slept in a separate tent and was watched by a eunuch … THIS SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN THE BEGINNING OF THE DOWNFALL OF THE CHAZAR KINGDOM … The Russian Varangians established themselves at Kiev… until the final conquest of the Chazars by the Russians … After a hard fight the Russians conquered the Chazars… Four years later the Russians conquered all the Chazarian territory east of the Azov … many members of the Chazarian royal family emigrated to Spain… Some went to Hungary, BUT THE GREAT MASS OF THE PEOPLE REMAINED IN THEIR NATIVE COUNTRY.”

The greatest historian on the origin and the history of the so-called or self-styled “Jews” in eastern Europe was Professor H. Graetz, himself a so-called or self-styled “Jew”. Professor H. Graetz points out in his famous “History of the Jews” that when so- called or self-styled “Jews” in other countries heard a rumor about so-called or self-styled “Jews” in the Khazar Kingdom they believed these converted Khazars to be the “lost ten tribes”. These rumors were no doubt responsible for the legend which grew up that Palestine was the “homeland” of the converted Khazars. On page 141 in his “History of the Jews” Professor H. Graetz states:

“The Chazars professed a coarse religion, which was combined with sensuality and lewdness…After Obadia came a long series of Jewish Chagans (kings), for ACCORDING TO A FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF THE STATE ONLY JEWISH RULERS WERE PERMITTED TO ASCEND THE THRONE…For some time THE JEWS OF OTHER COUNTRIES HAD NO KNOWLEDGE OF THE CONVERSION OF THIS POWERFUL KINGDOM TO JUDAISM, and when at last a vague rumor to this effect reached them, THEY WERE OF THE OPINION THAT CHAZARIA WAS PEOPLED BY THE REMNANT OF THE FORMER TEN TRIBES.”

When the Khazars in the 1st century B.C. invaded eastern Europe their mother-tongue was an Asiatic language, referred to in the Jewish Encyclopedia as the “Khazar languages”. They were primitive Asiatic dialects without any alphabet or any written form. When King Bulan was converted in the 7th century he decreed that the Hebrew characters he saw in the Talmud and other Hebrew documents was thereupon to become the alphabet for the Khazar language. The Hebrew characters were adopted to the phonetics of the spoken Khazar language. The Khazars adopted the characters of the so-called Hebrew language in order to provide a means for providing a written record of their speech. The adoption of the Hebrew characters had no racial, political or religious implication.

The western European uncivilized nations which had no alphabet for their spoken language adopted the alphabet of the Latin language under comparable circumstances. With the invasion of western Europe by the Romans the civilization and the culture of the Romans was introduced into these uncivilized areas. Thus the Latin alphabet was adopted for the language of the French, Spanish, ENGLISH, Swedish and many other western European languages. These languages were completely foreign to each other yet they all used the same alphabet. The Romans brought their alphabet with their culture to these uncivilized nations exactly like the rabbis brought the Hebrew alphabet from Babylonia to the Khazars when they introduced writing to them in the form of the Talmud’s alphabet.

Since the conquest of the Khazars by the Russians and the disappearance of the Khazar Kingdom the language of the Khazars is known as Yiddish. for about six centuries the so-called or self- styled “Jews” of eastern Europe have referred to themselves while still resident in their native eastern European countries as “Yiddish” by nationality. They identified themselves as “Yiddish” rather than as Russian, Polish, Galician, Lithuanian, Rumanian, Hungarian or by the nation of which they were citizens. They also referred to the common language they all spoke as “Yiddish” also. There are today in New York City as you know, my dear Dr. Goldstein, many “Yiddish” newspapers, “Yiddish” theaters, and many other cultural organizations of so-called or self-styled “Jews” from eastern Europe which are identified publicly by the word “Yiddish” in their title.

Before it became known as the “Yiddish” language, the mother-tongue of the Khazars added many words to its limited ancient vocabulary as necessity required. These words were acquired from the languages of its neighboring nations with whom they had political, social or economic relations. Languages of all nations add to their vocabularies in the same way. The Khazars adapted words to their requirements form the German, the Slavonic and the Baltic languages. The Khazars adopted a great number of words from the German language. The Germans had a much more advanced civilization than their Khazar neighbors and the Khazars sent their children to German schools and universities.

The “Yiddish” language is not a German dialect. Many people are led to believe so because “Yiddish” has borrowed so many words from the German language. If “Yiddish” is a German dialect acquired from the Germans then what language did the Khazars speak for 1000 years they existed in eastern Europe before they acquired culture from the Germans? The Khazars must have spoken some language when they invaded eastern Europe. What was that language? When did they discard it? How did the entire Khazar population discard one language and adopt another all of a sudden? The idea is too absurd to discuss. “Yiddish” is the modern name for the ancient mother-tongue of the Khazars with added German, Slavonic and Baltic adopted and adapted numerous words.

“Yiddish” must not be confused with “Hebrew” because they both use the same characters as their alphabets. There is not one word of “Yiddish” in ancient “Hebrew” nor is there one word of ancient “Hebrew” in “Yiddish”. As I stated before, they are as totally different as Swedish and Spanish which both likewise use the same Latin characters for their alphabets. The “Yiddish” languages is the cultural common denominator for all the so-called or self-styled “Jews” in or from eastern Europe. To the so-called or self-styled “Jews” in and from eastern Europe, “Yiddish” serves them like the English language serves the populations of the 48 states of the United States. Their cultural common denominator throughout the 48 states is the English language, or wherever they may emigrate and resettle. The English language is the tie which binds them to each other. It is the same with the “Yiddish” language and so-called or self-styled “Jews” throughout the world.

“Yiddish” serves another very useful purpose for so-called or self-styled “Jews” throughout the world. They possess in “Yiddish” what no other national, racial or religious group can claim. Approximately 90% of the world’s so-called or self-styled “Jews” living in 42 countries of the world today are either emigrants from eastern Europe, or their parents emigrated from eastern Europe. “Yiddish” is a language common to all of them as their first or second language according to where they were born. It is an “international” language to them. Regardless of what country in the world they may settle in they will always find co-religionists who also speak “Yiddish”. “Yiddish” enjoys other international advantages too obvious to describe here. “Yiddish” is the modern language of a nation which has lost its existence as a nation. “Yiddish” never had a religious implication, although using Hebrew characters for its alphabet. It must not be confused with words like “Jewish”. But it is very much.

Directly north of the Khazar Kingdom at the height of its power a small Slavic state was organized in 820 A.D. on the south shore of the Gulf of Finland where it flows into the Baltic Sea. This small state was organized by a small group of Varangians from the Scandinavian peninsula on the opposite shore of the Baltic Sea. The native population of this newly formed state consisted of nomad Slavs who had made their home in this area from earliest recorded history. This infant nation was even small than our state of Delaware. This newly-born state however was the embryo which developed into the great Russian Empire. In less than 1000 years since 820 A.D. this synthetic nation expanded its borders by ceaseless conquests until it now includes more than 9,500,000 square miles in Europe and Asia, or more than three times the area of continental United States, and they have not stopped.

During the 10th, 11th, 12th, and 13th centuries the rapidly expanding Russian nation gradually swallowed up the Khazar kingdom, its neighbor directly to the south. The conquest of the Khazar Kingdom by the Russians supplies history with the explanation for the presence after the 13th century of the large number of so-called or self-styled “Jews” in Russia. The large number of so-called or self-styled “Jews” in Russia and in eastern Europe after the destruction of the Khazar Kingdom were thereafter no longer known as Khazars but as the “Yiddish” populations of these many countries. They so refer to themselves today.

In the many wars with her neighbors in Europe after the 13th century Russia was required to cede to her victors large areas which were originally part of the Khazar Kingdom. In this manner Poland, Lithuania, Galicia, Hungary, Rumania, and Austria acquired from Russia territory originally a part of the Khazar Kingdom. Together with this territory these nations acquired a segment of the population of so-called or self-styled “Jews” descended from the Khazars who once occupied the territory. These frequent boundary changes by the nations in eastern Europe explains the presence today of so-called or self-styled “Jews” in all these countries who all trace their ancestry back to the converted Khazars. Their common language, their common culture, their common religion, and their common racial characteristics classify them all beyond any question of doubt with the Khazars who invaded eastern Europe in the 1st century B.C. and were converted to “Talmudism” in the 7th century.

The so-called or self-styled “Jews” throughout the world today of eastern European origin make up at least 90% of the world’s total present population of so-called or self-styled “Jews”. The conversion of King Bulan and the Khazar nation in the 7th century accomplished for “Talmudism”, or for “Judaism” as “Talmudism” is called today, what the conversion of Constantine and the western European nations accomplished for Christianity. Christianity was a small comparatively unimportant religious belief practiced principally in the eastern Mediterranean area until the conversion to the Christian faith of the large populations of the western European pagan nations after the conversion of Constantine. “Talmudism”, or “Judaism” as “Talmudism” is known today, was given its greatest stimulus in all its history with the conversion of the large pagan Khazar population in the 7th century. Without the conversion of the Khazar population it is doubtful if “Talmudism”, or “Judaism” as “Talmudism” is known today, could have survived. “Talmudism”, the civil and religious code of the Pharisees, most likely would have passed out of existence like the many other creeds and cults practiced by the peoples in that area before, during and after “Pharisaism” assumed its prominent position among these creeds and cults in the time of Jesus. “Talmudism”, as “Pharisaism” was called later, would have disappeared with all its contemporary creeds and cults but for the conversion of the Khazars to “Talmudism” in the 7th century. At that time “Talmudism” was well on its way towards complete oblivion.

In the year 986 A. D. the ruler of Russia, Vladimir III, became a convert to the Christian faith in order to marry a Catholic Slavonic princess of a neighboring sovereign state. The marriage was otherwise impossible. Vladimir III thereupon also made his newly-acquired Christian faith the state religion of Russia replacing the pagan worship formerly practiced in Russia since it was founded in 820 A.D. Vladimir III and his successors as the rulers of Russia attempted in vain to convert his so-called or self-styled “Jews”, now Russian subjects, to Russia’s Christian state religion and to adopt the customs and culture of the numerically predominant Russian Christian population. The so-called or self- styled “Jews” in Russia refused and resisted this plan vigorously. They refused to adopt the Russian alphabet in place of the Hebrew characters used in writing their “Yiddish” language. They resisted the substitution of the Russian language for “Yiddish” as their mother-tongue. They opposed every attempt to bring about the complete assimilation of the former sovereign Khazar nation into the Russian nation. They resisted with every means at their disposal. The many forms of tension which resulted produced situations described by history as “massacres”, “pogroms”, “persecution”, discrimination, etc.

In Russia at that period of history it was the custom as in other Christian countries in Europe at that time to take an oath, vow or pledge of loyalty to the rulers, the nobles, the feudal landholders and others in the name of Jesus Christ. It was after the conquest of the Khazars by the Russians that the wording of the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer was altered. The new altered version of the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer is referred to in the Talmud as “the law of revocation in advance”. The “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer was regarded as a “law”. The effect of this “LAW OF REVOCATION IN ADVANCE” obtained for all who recited it each year on the eve of the Day of Atonement divine dispensation from all obligations acquired under “oaths, vows and pledges” to be made or taken in the COMING YEAR. The recital of the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer on the eve of the Day of Atonement released those so-called or self-styled “Jews” from any obligation under “oaths, vows or pledges” entered into during the NEXT TWELVE MONTHS. The “oaths, vows and pledges” made or taken by so-called or self-styled “Jews” were made or taken “with tongue in cheek” for twelve months.

The altered version of the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer created serious difficulties for the so-called or self-styled “Jews” when its wording became public property. It apparently did not remain a secret very long, although the Talmud states “the law of revocation in advance was not made public”. The altered version of the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer soon became known as the “Jews Vow” and cast serious doubt upon “oaths, vows or pledges” given to Christians by so-called or self-styled “Jews”. Christians soon believed that “oaths, vows or pledges” were quite worthless when given by so-called or self-styled “Jews”. This was the basis for so-called “discrimination” by governments, nobles, feudal landholders, and others who required oaths of allegiance and loyalty from those who entered their service.

An intelligent attempt was made to correct this situation by a group of German rabbis in 1844. In that year they called an international conference of rabbis in Brunswick, Germany. They attempted to have the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer completely eliminated from the Day of Atonement ceremonies, and entirely abolish from any religious service of their faith. They felt that this secular prologue to the Day of Atonement ceremonies was void of any spiritual implication and did not belong in any synagogue ritual. However the preponderant majority of the rabbis attending that conference in Brunswick came from eastern Europe. They represented congregations of Yiddish-speaking so-called or self- styled “Jews” of converted Khazar origin in eastern Europe. They insisted that the altered version of the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer be retained exactly as it was then recited on the Day of Atonement. They demanded that it be allowed to remain as it had been recited in eastern Europe since the change by Meir ben Samuel six centuries earlier. It is today recited in exactly that form throughout the world by so-called or self-styled “Jews”. Will the 150,000,000 Christians in the United States react any differently when they become more aware of its insidious implications?

How genuine can the implications, inferences and innuendoes of the so-called “brotherhood” and “interfaith” movements be under these circumstances? These so-called movements are sweeping the nations like prairie fires. If the Talmud is the axis of the political, economic, cultural and social attitudes and activities of so-called or self-styled “Jews” participating in these two so-called movements, how genuine are the “oaths, vows or pledges” taken or given in connection with these two so-called movements by so-called or self-styled “Jews”? It would be a superlative gesture of “brotherhood” or of “interfaith” if the National Conference of Christians and Jews succeeded in expunging from the Talmud all anti-Christ, anti-Christian, and anti- Christianity passages. At a cost of many millions of dollars the National Conference of Christians and Jews succeeded in expunging from the New Testament passages which so-called or self-styled “Jews” regarded as offensive to their faith. A great portion of the cost was supplied by so-called or self-styled “Jews”. Christians might now supply funds to expunge from the Talmud passages offensive to the Christian faith. Otherwise the so-called “brotherhood” and “interfaith” movements are merely mockeries.

The National Conference of Christians and Jews might look into the millions of dollars being invested today by so-called or self-styled “Jews” to insure that the Talmud shall remain the axis of political, economic, cultural and social attitudes and activities of so- called or self-styled “Jews” today, and future generations. Violating the basic principle of “brotherhood” and “interfaith” so-called or self-styled “Jews” are spending millions of dollars each year to establish and equip quarters where the teachings of the Talmud can be indoctrinated into the minds of children from the time they are able to read and write. These few news items were selected from hundreds like them which are appearing daily in newspapers clear across the nation:

“Two new Jewish Centers, built at a cost of $300,000 will be opened to 1000 students for daily and Sunday school activities next month, it was announced by the Associated Talmud Torahs.” (Chicago Herald-Tribune, 8/19/50.) “The Yeshiva School Department now provides daytime an approved English-Hebrew curriculum for grades 1 to 5 (aged 51/2 to 10). The afternoon Talmud Torah has opened a new beginner’s class and is accepting enrollment of advanced as well as beginner students.” (Jewish Voice, 9/18/53.)

“RABBI TO TALK ON TALMUD TO SHOLEM MEN.

Dr. David Graubert presiding rabbi of Bet Din, and professor of rabbinical literature at the College of Jewish Studies, will present the first of his series of four lectures, “The World of the Talmud’. (Chicago Tribune, 10/29/53.)

“MARYLAND GRANTS DEGREE IN TALMUD.

Baltimore, (JTA). New Israel Rabbinical College has been granted here authority by the Maryland State Board of Education to issue degrees of Master of Talmudic Law and Doctor of Talmudic Law.” (Jewish Voice, 1/9/53.)

“TALMUD LESSONS ON AIR FROM JERUSALEM.

Weekly radio lectures on the Talmud, in English, will be available shortly on tape recordings for local stations in the United States and Canada, it was announced today.” (California Jewish Voice, 1/11/52.)

Earlier in this letter, my dear Dr. Goldstein, you remember reading a quotation by the most eminent authority on the Talmud to the effect that “THE MODERN JEW IS A PRODUCT OF THE TALMUD.” Would it surprise you to learn that many Christians also are the “PRODUCT OF THE TALMUD”. The teachings of the Talmud are accepted by Christians in the highest echelons. I will only quote one of the subject of the Talmud, the former President of the United States. In 1951 President Truman was presented with his second set of the “63 books” of the Talmud. On the occasion of his acceptance the newspapers carried the following news item:

“Mr. Truman thanked us for the books and said that he was glad to get them as `I have read many more of the ones presented four years ago than a lot of people think’. He said that he did read a lot and that the book he read the most is the Talmud which contains much sound reasoning and good philosophy of life”.

Former President Truman says he benefits by “much sound reasoning” and his brand of “good philosophy of life” which absorbs from the “book that he reads the most.” His recent term in office reflected his study of the Talmud. No one familiar with the Talmud will deny that. But does our former President Truman known that Jesus did not feel the way he feels about the Talmud? The “much good reasoning” and the “good philosophy of life” in the Talmud were constantly and consistently denounced by Jesus in no uncertain terms. Former President Truman should refresh his memory by reading the New Testament passages where Jesus expresses Himself on the question of the Pharisees and their Talmud. Will Mr. Truman state that in his opinion the Talmud was the “sort of book” from which Jesus “drew the teachings which enabled him to revolutionize the world” on “moral and religious subjects”?

Before leaving the Talmud as my subject I would like to refer to the most authentic analysis of the Talmud which has ever been written. You should obtain a copy of it and read it. You will be amply rewarded for your trouble in finding a copy of it. I can doubly assure you. The name of the book is “The Talmud”. It was written almost a century ago in French by Arsene Darmesteter. In 1897 it was translated into English by the celebrated Henrietta Szold and published by the Jewish Publication Society of America in Philadelphia. Henrietta Szold was an outstanding educator and Zionist and one of the most notable and admirable so-called or self- styled “Jews” of this century. Henrietta Szold’s translation of Arsene Darmesteter’s “The Talmud” is a classic. You will never understand the Talmud until you have read it. I will quote from it sparingly:

“Now Judaism finds its expression in the Talmud, which is not a remote suggestion and a faint echo thereof, but in which it has become incarnate, in which it has taken form, passing from a state of abstraction into the domain of real things. THE STUDY OF JUDAISM IS THAT OF THE TALMUD, AS THE STUDY OF THE TALMUD IS THAT OF JUDAISM . . . THEY ARE TWO INSEPARABLE THINGS, OR BETTER, THEY ARE ONE AND THE SAME . . . Accordingly, the Talmud is the completest expression of religious movement, and this code of endless prescriptions and minute ceremonials represents in its perfection the total work of the religious idea . . . The miracle was accomplished by a book, the Talmud . . . The Talmud, in turn, is composed of two distinct parts, the Mishna and the Gemara; the former the text, the latter the commentary upon the text . . . By the term Mishna we designate A COLLECTION OF DECISIONS AND TRADITIONAL LAWS, EMBRACING ALL DEPARTMENTS OF LEGISLATION, CIVIL AND RELIGIOUS . . . This code, which was the work of several generations of Rabbis . . . Nothing, indeed can EQUAL THE IMPORTANCE OF THE TALMUD unless it be the ignorance that prevails concerning it . . . This explains how it happens that a single page of the Talmud contains three or four different languages, or rather specimens of one language at three or four stages of degeneracy . . . Many a Mischna of five or six lines is accompanied by fifty or sixty pages of explanation . . . is Law in all its authority; it constitutes dogma and cult; it is the fundamental element of the Talmud . . . The DAILY STUDY OF THE TALMUD, WHICH AMONG JEWS BEGAN WITH THE AGE OF TEN TO END LIFE ITSELF, necessarily was a severe gymnastic for the mind, thanks to which IT ACQUIRED INCOMPARABLE SUBTLETY AND ACUMEN . . . SINCE IT ASPIRES TO ONE THING: TO ESTABLISH FOR JUDAISM A `CORPUS JURIS ECCLESIASTICI’.”

The above quotations were culled from a treatise intended to sugar-coat the Talmud. In painting a nice word-picture of the Talmud the author could not escape mentioning the above facts also. Coming from this source under the circumstances the facts stated above do not add glory to the Talmud.

“The Talmud Unmasked, The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians,” was written by Rev. I.B. Pranaitis, Master of Theology and Professor of the Hebrew Language at the Imperial Ecclesiastical Academy of the Roman Catholic Church in Old St. Petersburg, Russia. The Rev. Pranaitis was the greatest of the students of the Talmud. His complete command of the Hebrew language qualified him to analyze the Talmud as few men in history.

The Rev. Pranaitis scrutinized the Talmud for passages referring to Jesus, Christians and the Christian faith. These passages were translated by him into Latin. Hebrew lends itself to translation into Latin better than it does directly into English. The translation of the passages of the Talmud referring to Jesus, Christians and Christian faith were printed in Latin by the Imperial Academy of Sciences in St. Petersburg in 1893 with the Imprimatur of his Archbishop. The translation from the Latin into English was made by great Latin scholars in the United States in 1939 with funds provided by wealthy Americans for that purpose.

In order not to leave any loose ends on the subject of the Talmud’s reference to Jesus, to Christians and to the Christian faith I will below summarize translations into English from the Latin texts of Rev. Pranaitis’ “The Talmud Unmasked, The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians”. It would require too much space to quote these passages verbatim with their foot-notes form the Soncino Edition in English.

First I will summarize the references by Rev. Pranaitis referring to Jesus in the Talmud in the original texts translated by him into Latin, and from Latin into English:

  • Sanhedrin, 67a — Jesus referred to as the son of Pandira, a soldier
  • Kallah, 1b. (18b) — Illegitimate and conceived during menstruation.
  • Sanhedrin, 67a — Hanged on the eve of Passover. Toldath Jeschu. Birth related in most shameful expressions
  • Abhodah Zarah II — Referred to as the son of Pandira, a Roman soldier.
  • Schabbath XIV. Again referred to as the son of Pandira, the Roman.
  • Sanhedrin, 43a — On the eve of Passover they hanged Jesus.
  • Schabbath, 104b — Called a fool and no one pays attention to fools.
  • Toldoth Jeschu. Judas and Jesus engaged in quarrel with filth.
  • Sanhedrin, 103a. — Suggested corrupts his morals and dishonors self.
  • Sanhedrin, 107b. — Seduced, corrupted and destroyed Israel.
  • Zohar III, (282) — Died like a beast and buried in animal’s dirt heap.
  • Hilkoth Melakhim — Attempted to prove Christians err in worship of Jesus
  • Abhodah Zarah, 21a — Reference to worship of Jesus in homes unwanted.
  • Orach Chaiim, 113 — Avoid appearance of paying respect to Jesus.
  • Iore dea, 150,2 — Do not appear to pay respect to Jesus by accident.
  • Abhodah Zarah (6a) — False teachings to worship on first day of Sabbath

The above are a few selected from a very complicated arrangement in which many references are obscured by intricate reasoning. The following are a few summarized references to Christians and the Christian faith although not always expressed in exactly that manner. There are eleven names used in the Talmud for non-Talmud followers, by which Christians are meant. Besides Nostrim, from Jesus the Nazarene, Christians are called by all the names used in the Talmud to designate all non-“Jews”: Minim, Edom, Abhodan Zarah, Akum. Obhde Elilim, Nokrim, Amme Haarets, Kuthim, Apikorosim, and Goim. Besides supplying the names by which Christians are called in the Talmud, the passages quoted below indicate what kind of people the Talmud pictures the Christians to be, and what the Talmud says about the religious worship of Christians:

  • Hilkhoth Maakhaloth — Christians are idolators, must not associate.
  • Abhodah Zarah (22a) — Do not associate with gentiles, they shed blood.
  • Iore Dea (153, 2). — Must not associate with Christians, shed blood.
  • Abhodah Zarah (25b). — Beware of Christians when walking abroad with them.
  • Orach Chaiim (20, 2). — Christians disguise themselves to kill Jews.
  • Abhodah Zarah (15b) — Suggest Christians have sex relations with animals.
  • Abhodah Zarah (22a) — Suspect Christians of intercourse with animals.
  • Schabbath (145b) — Christians unclean because they eat accordingly
  • Abhodah Zarah (22b) — Christians unclean because they not at Mount Sinai.
  • Iore Dea (198, 48). — Clean female Jews contaminated meeting Christians.
  • Kerithuth (6b p. 78) — Jews called men, Christians not called men.
  • Makkoth (7b) — Innocent of murder if intent was to kill Christian.
  • Orach Chaiim(225, 10) — Christians and animals grouped for comparisons.
  • Midrasch Talpioth 225 — Christians created to minister to Jews always.
  • Orach Chaiim 57, 6a — Christians to be pitied more than sick pigs.
  • Zohar II (64b) — Christian idolators likened to cows and asses.
  • Kethuboth (110b). — Psalmist compares Christians to unclean beasts.
  • Sanhedrin (74b). Tos. — Sexual intercourse of Christian like that of beast.
  • Kethuboth (3b) — The seed of Christian is valued as seed of beast.
  • Kidduschim (68a) — Christians like the people of an ass.
  • Eben Haezar (44,8) — Marriages between Christian and Jews null.
  • Zohar (II, 64b) — Christian birth rate must be diminished materially.
  • Zohar (I, 28b) — Christian idolators children of Eve’s serpent.
  • Zohar (I, 131a) — Idolatrous people (Christians) befoul the world.
  • Emek Haschanach(17a) — Non-Jews’ souls come from death and death’s shadow.
  • Zohar (I, 46b, 47a) — Souls of gentiles have unclean divine origins.
  • Rosch Haschanach(17a) — Non-Jews souls go down to hell.
  • Iore Dea (337, 1). — Replace dead Christians like lost cow or ass.
  • Iebhammoth (61a) — Jews called men, but not Christians called men.
  • Abhodah Zarah (14b) T — Forbidden to sell religious works to Christians
  • Abhodah Zarah (78) — Christian churches are places of idolatry.
  • Iore Dea (142, 10) — Must keep far away physically from churches.
  • Iore Dea (142, 15) — Must not listen to church music or look at idols
  • Iore Dea (143, 1) — Must not rebuild homes destroyed near churches.
  • Hilkoth Abh. Zar (10b) — Jews must not resell broken chalices to Christians.
  • Chullin (91b) — Jews possess dignity even an angel cannot share.
  • Sanhedrin, 58b — To strike Israelite like slapping face of God.
  • Chagigah, 15b — A Jew considered good in spite of sins he commits.
  • Gittin (62a) — Jew stay away from Christian homes on holidays.
  • Choschen Ham. (26,1) — Jew must not sue before a Christian judge or laws.
  • Choschen Ham (34,19) — Christian or servant cannot become witnesses.
  • Iore Dea (112, 1). — Avoid eating with Christians, breeds familiarity.
  • Abhodah Zarah (35b) — Do not drink milk from a cow milked by Christian.
  • Iore dea (178, 1) — Never imitate customs of Christians, even hair-comb.
  • Abhodah Zarah (72b) — Wine touched by Christians must be thrown away.
  • Iore Dea (120, 1) — Bought-dishes from Christians must be thrown away.
  • Abhodah Zarah (2a) — For three days before Christian festivals, avoid all.
  • Abhodah Zarah (78c) — Festivals of followers of Jesus regarded as idolatry.
  • Iore Dea (139, 1) — Avoid things used by Christians in their worship.
  • Abhodah Zarah (14b) — Forbidden to sell Christians articles for worship.
  • Iore Dea (151,1) H. — Do not sell water to Christians articles for baptisms.
  • Abhodah Zarah (2a, 1) — Do not trade with Christians on their feast days.
  • Abhodah Zarah (1,2) — Now permitted to trade with Christians on such days.
  • Abhodah Zarah (2aT) — Trade with Christians because they have money to pay.
  • Iore Dea (148, 5) — If Christian is not devout, may send him gifts.
  • Hilkoth Akum (IX,2) — Send gifts to Christians only if they are irreligious.
  • Iore Dea (81,7 Ha) — Christian wet-nurses to be avoided because dangerous.
  • Iore Dea (153, 1 H) — Christian nurse will lead children to heresy.
  • Iore Dea (155,1). — Avoid Christian doctors not well known to neighbors.
  • Peaschim (25a) — Avoid medical help from idolators, Christians meant.
  • Iore Dea (156,1) — Avoid Christian barbers unless escorted by Jews.
  • Abhodah Zarah (26a). — Avoid Christian midwives as dangerous when alone.
  • Zohar (1,25b) — Those who do good to Christians never rise when dead.
  • Hilkoth Akum (X,6) — Help needy Christians if it will promote peace.
  • Iore Dea (148, 12H) — Hide hatred for Christians at their celebrations.
  • Abhodah Zarah (20a) — Never praise Christians lest it be believed true.
  • Iore Dea (151,14) — Not allowed to praise Christians to add to glory.
  • Hilkoth Akum (V, 12) — Quote Scriptures to forbid mention of Christian god.
  • Iore Dea (146, 15) — Refer to Christian religious articles with contempt.
  • Iore Dea (147,5) — Deride Christian religious articles without wishes.
  • Hilkoth Akum (X,5) — No gifts to Christians, gifts to converts.
  • Iore Dea (151,11) — Gifts forbidden to Christians, encourages friendship.
  • Iore Dea (335,43) — Exile for that Jew who sells farm to Christian.
  • Iore Dea (154,2) — Forbidden to teach a trade to a Christian
  • Babha Bathra (54b) — Christian property belongs to first person claiming.
  • Choschen Ham(183,7) — Keep what Christian overpays in error.
  • Choschen Ham(226,1) — Jew may keep lost property of Christian found by Jew.
  • Babha Kama (113b) — It is permitted to deceive Christians.
  • Choschen Ham(183,7) — Jews must divide what they overcharge Christians.
  • Choschen Ham(156,5) — Jews must not take Christian customers from Jews.
  • Iore Dea (157,2) H — May deceive Christians that believe Christian tenets.
  • Abhodah Zarah (54a) –Usury may be practiced upon Christians or apostates.
  • Iore Dea (159,1) — Usury permitted now for any reason to Christians.
  • Babha Kama (113a) — Jew may lie and perjure to condemn a Christian.
  • Babha Kama (113b) — Name of God not profaned when lying to Christians.
  • Kallah (1b, p.18) — Jew may perjure himself with a clear conscience.
  • Schabbouth Hag. (6d). — Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording.
  • Zohar (1,160a). — Jews must always try to deceive Christians.
  • Iore Dea (158,1) — Do not cure Christians unless it makes enemies.
  • Orach Cahiim (330,2) — Do not assist Christian’s childbirth on Saturday.
  • Choschen Ham.(425,5) — Unless believes in Torah do not prevent his death.
  • Iore Dea (158,1) — Christians not enemies must not be saved either.
  • Hilkkoth Akum (X,1) — Do not save Christians in danger of death.
  • Choschen Ham(386,10) — A spy may be killed even before he confesses.
  • Abhodah Zorah (26b) — Apostates to be thrown into well, not rescued.
  • Choschen Ham(388,15) — Kill those who give Israelites’ money to Christians
  • Sanhedrin (59a) — `Prying into Jews’ “Law” to get death penalty
  • Hilkhoth Akum(X,2) — Baptized Jews are to be put to death
  • Iore Dea(158,2)Hag. — Kill renegades who turn to Christian rituals.
  • Choschen Ham(425,5) — Those who do not believe in Torah are to be killed.
  • Hilkhoth tesch.III,8 — Christians and others deny the “Law” of the Torah.
  • Zohar (I,25a) — Christians are to be destroyed as idolators.
  • Zohar (II,19a) — Captivity of Jews end when Christian princes die.
  • Zohar (I,219b) — Princes of Christians are idolators, must die.
  • Obadiam — When Rome is destroyed, Israel will be redeemed.
  • Abhodah Zarah(26b) T. — “Even the best of the Goim should be killed.”
  • Sepher Or Israel 177b — If Jew kills Christian commits no sin.
  • Ialkut Simoni (245c) — Shedding blood of impious offers sacrifice to God.
  • Zohar (II, 43a) — Extermination of Christians necessary sacrifice.
  • Zohar (L,28b,39a) — High place in heaven for those who kill idolators.
  • Hilkhoth Akum(X,1) — Make no agreements and show no mercy to Christians
  • Hilkhoth Akum (X,1) — Either turn them away from their idols or kill.
  • Hilkhoth Akum (X,7) — Allow no idolators to remain where Jews are strong.
  • Choschen Ham(388,16) — All contribute to expense of killing traitor.
  • Pesachim (49b) — No need of prayers while beheading on Sabbath.
  • Schabbath (118a). — Prayers to save from punishment of coming Messiah.

In the Library of Congress and the New York Public Library, unless recently removed, you can find a copy of “The Talmud Unmasked, The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians” by the Rev. I. B. Pranaitis. A copy of the original work printed in St. Petersburg, Russia in 1892 can be made available to you by our mutual friend if you are interested in reading the above passages in the original Hebrew text with their Latin translation. I trust my summaries correctly explain the original text. I believe they do. If I am in error in any way please be so kind as to let me know. It was very difficult to reduce them to short summaries.

The National Conference of Christians and Jews need not scrutinize the “63 books” of the Talmud to discover all the anti- Christ, anti-Christian, and anti-Christian faith passages in the books which are “THE LEGAL CODE WHICH FORMS THE BASIS OF JEWISH RELIGIOUS LAW” and which is “THE TEXTBOOK USED IN THE TRAINING OF RABBIS”. They can also keep that, as Rabbi Morris Kertzer also points out, as explained earlier, that “ADULTS STUDY ANCIENT WRITINGS TOO… IN… GROUP DISCUSSION OF TALMUD BEFORE EVENING PRAYER”. If the National Conference of Christians and Jews are genuinely interested in “interfaith” and “brotherhood” do you not think, my dear Dr. Goldstein, that they should compel a start at once to expunge from the Talmud the anti-Christ, anti- Christian, and anti-Christianity passages from the Talmud in the “brotherly” way they expunged passages from the New Testament? Will you ask them?

Throughout the world the Oxford English Dictionary is accepted as the most authoritative and authentic source for information on the origin, definition and use of words in the English language. Authorities in all fields everywhere accept the Oxford English Dictionary brings out clearly that “Judaist” and “Judaic” are the correct forms for the improper and incorrect misused and misleading “Jews” and “Jewish”. You will agree completely with the Oxford English Dictionary if you consider the matter carefully. “Judaist” and “Judaic” are correct. “Jews” and “Jewish” are incorrect. “Jew” and “Jewish” do not belong in the English language if the use of the correct words is of interest to the English-speaking peoples.

The so-called or self-styled “Jews” cannot truthfully describe themselves as “Jews” because they are not in any sense “Judeans”. They can correctly identify themselves by their religious belief if they so wish by identifying themselves as “Judaists”. A “Judaist” is a person who professes so-called “Judaism” as his religious belief, according to the Oxford English Dictionary. The origin of “Jew” has not its roots in “Judaism” as explained. The adjective form of “Judaist” is “Judaic”. “Jewish” as an adjective is just as incorrect as “Jew” is as a noun. “Jewish” has no reason to exist.

Well-planned and well-financed publicity by so-called or self-styled “Jews” in English-speaking countries in the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries created a wide acceptance and use for “Jewish”. “Jewish” is being used today in many ways that are no less fantastic and grotesque than incorrect and inaccurate. “Jewish” is used today to describe everything from “Jewish blood”, whatever that may be, to “Jewish Rye Bread”, strange as that may sound. The many implications, inferences and innuendoes of “Jewish” today resulting from its commercial uses beggar description.

At the 1954 annual meeting of the St. Paul Guild in the Plaza Hotel in New York City before more than 1000 Catholics, a Roman Catholic priest who was the main speaker and the guest of honor referred to “my Jewish blood”. It just happens that this priest was born a so-called or self-styled “Jews” in eastern Europe and was converted to Catholicism there about 25 years ago. It seems unique that a priest who has professed Catholicism that length of time should mention “my Jewish blood” to Catholics. The radio blasts and the out-door signs blazon “Levy’s Jewish Rye Bread”, in the same city at the same time. Between these two extremes are countless other products and other services which advertise themselves in print, on radio and television, as “Jewish”.

This priest who talks to Catholics about “my Jewish blood” when he addresses audiences also refers to the “Jewish blood” of Mary, Holy Mother of Jesus, to the “Jewish blood” of the Apostles, and to the “Jewish blood” of the early Christians. What he means by “my Jewish blood” mystifies those Catholics who hear him. They query “What is `Jewish blood’ “? They ask what happens to “Jewish blood” when so-called or self-styled “Jews” are converted to Catholicism? And in the extreme case when a so-called or self- styled “Jew” becomes a Roman Catholic priest? How is “Jewish blood” biologically different from the blood of persons who profess other religious faiths, they ask. It is hard for me to believe that there is anything biologically different which determines characteristics typical of a specific religious belief. Are the inherent racial and national characteristics determined by religious dogma or doctrine?

The word “Jewess” raises a similar question. If “Jewess” is the female for the male “Jew” I must admit that I have been unable to find female as well as male designation for persons professing any religious belief other than so-called “Judaism”. Are there any other that you know? I have searched for the female of Catholicism, Protestantism, Hindu, Moslem, and others but without success. It seems very popular now to refer to Mary, Holy Mother of Jesus, as a “Jewess”. It does seem unrealistic to identify the sex of members of any religious belief by appropriate designations. If the word “Jew” is regarded as descriptive of a race or a nation, as is often the case, it is equally unrealistic to indicate the sex of members of a race or a nation by a suffix used for that purpose. I know of no case in that respect except “Negress”, and the Negro race strongly objects to the use of that designation, and strongly.

Another word is creating more problems among Christians. I refer to “Judeo-Christian”. You see it more and more day by day. Based on our present knowledge of history, and on good sense applied to theology, the term “Judea-Christian” presents a strange combination. Does “Judeo” refer to ancient “Pharisaism”, or to “Talmudism”, or to so-called “Judaism”? In view of what we know today, how can there be “Judeo-Christian” anything? Based upon what is now known “Judeo-Christian” is as unrealistic as it would be to say anything is “hot-cold” , or “old-young”, or “heavy-light”, or that a person was “healthy-sick”, or “poor-rich”, or “dumb- smart”, or “ignorant-educated”, or “happy-sad”. These words are antonyms, not synonyms. “Judeo-Christian” in the light of incontestable facts are also antonyms, not synonyms as so-called or self-styled “Jews” would like Christians to believe. More sand for Christian’s eyes.

An “Institute of Judeo-Christian Studies” has been established by Seton Hall University. It is actually a “one-man Institute”. Father John M. Oesterreicher is the “one-man Institute”. The “Institute of Judaeo-Christian Studies” occupies a small office in a down-town office building in Newark, N. J. This “one-man Institute”, according to their literature, has no faculty except Father Oesterreicher, and no students. Father Oesterreicher was born a so- called or self-styled “Jew” and became a convert to Catholicism. I have had the pleasure of hearing him talk on many occasions. Addresses by Father Oesterreicher and literature by mail are the principal activities of the “Institute of Judaeo-Christian Studies”. Father Oesterreicher also plans to publish books and circulate them throughout the world, in large quantities.

Father Oesterreicher leaves no stones unturned to convince Catholics that “Judaeo-Christian” is a combination of two words that are synonyms theologically. Nothing could be further from the truth. Father Oesterreicher impresses that viewpoint upon his Catholic audiences. Father Oesterreicher talks to Catholic audiences only, so far as I am able to tell. In his addresses Father Oesterreicher impresses upon Catholics the opinion he personally holds on the question of the dependence of the Christian faith upon so-called “Judaism”. His audiences depart Father Osterreicher’s addresses very much confused.

It would make better Catholics out of Father Oesterreicher’s audiences if he would “sell” Jesus and the Catholic Church rather than try to “sell” so-called “Judaism” to his audiences. Well-planned and well-financed publicity by so-called or self-styled “Jews” manages to keep Christians well informed on the subject of so-called “Judaism”. If Father Oesterreicher would concentrate upon “selling” Jesus and the Christian faith to audiences of so-called or self-styled “Jews” he would be doing more towards realizing the objectives of Christian effort. The activities of this “one-man Institute” are somewhat of a deep mystery. But I am certain that Monsignor McNulty will never allow the “Institute of Judaeo-Christian Studies” to bring discredit upon the fine record of Seton Hall as one of the foremost Catholic universities anywhere. But it will bear watching, and Monsignor McNulty will always appreciate constructive comment.

The word “anti-Semitism” is another word which should be eliminated from the English language. “Anti-Semitism” serves only one purpose today. It is used as a “smear word”. When so-called or self-styled “Jews” feel that anyone opposes any of their objectives they discredit their victims by applying the word “anti-Semite” or “anti-Semitic” through all the channels they have at their command and under their control. I can speak with great authority on that subject. Because so-called or self-styled “Jews” were unable to disprove my public statements in 1946 with regard to the situation in Palestine, they spent millions of dollars to “smear” me as an “anti-Semite” hoping thereby to discredit me in the eyes of the public who were very much interested in what I had to say. Until 1946 I was a “little saint” to all so-called or self-styled “Jews”. When I disagreed with them publicly on the Zionist intentions in Palestine I became suddenly “Anti-Semite No. 1”.

It is disgraceful to watch the Christian clergy take up the use of the word “anti-Semitism”. They should know better. They know that “anti-Semitism” is a meaningless word in the sense it is used today. They know the correct word is “Judaeophobe”. “Anti- Semite” was developed into the “smear-word” it is today because “Semite” is associated with Jesus in the minds of Christians. Christians are accessories in the destruction of the Christian faith by tolerating the use of the smear-word “anti-Semitic” to silence by the most intolerant forms of persecution employing that smear word Christians who oppose the evil conspirators.

It no doubt grieves you as much as it grieves me, my dear Dr. Goldstein, to see our nation’s moral standards sink to new all- time lows day by day. Of that there is very little doubt. The moral standards of this nation in political, economic, social and spiritual fields are the factors which determine the position we will occupy in world affairs. We will be judged on that basis from afar by the other 94% of the world’s total population. Our 6% of the world’s total population will succeed or fail in its efforts to retain world leadership by our moral standards because in the last analysis they influence the attitudes and activities of the nation. The moral standards are the crucible in which the nation’s character is refined and molded. The end product will never be any better than the ingredients used. It is something to think about.

There is much for which this Christian country can still feel very proud. But there is also much for which we cannot feel proud. A correct diagnosis of our nation’s rapidly deteriorating moral standards in all walks of life will reveal the cause as the nation’s current psychosis to concentrate primarily on how to (1) “make MORE money” and (2) “have MORE fun”. How many persons do you personally know who include among their daily duties service and sacrifice in the defense against its enemies of that priceless birthright which is the God-given heritage of all those blessed to be born Americans? What services? What sacrifices?

With very few exceptions this generation seems to regard everything as secondary to our accountability to unborn generations for our generation’s breach of the faith and betrayal of our trust to posterity. The sabotage of our nation’s moral standards is more incidental to the program of that inimical conspiracy than accidental in the continued march of mankind towards an easier existence. The guidance and control of this nation’s place in history has gravitated by default into the hands of those persons lease worthy of that trusteeship. This notable achievement by them is their reward for their success in obtaining effective and numerous Christian “male prostitutes” to “front” for them. Too many of these efficacious Christian “male prostitutes” are scattered throughout the nation in public affairs for the security of the Christian faith and the nation’s political, social and economic stability.

A “male prostitute” is a male who offers the faculties of his anatomy from the neck up for hire to anyone who will pay his “asking price” exactly as the female of the same species offers the facilities of her anatomy from the neck down to anyone who will pay her “asking price”. Thousands of these pseudo-Christian “male-prostitutes” circulate freely unrecognized in all walks of life proudly pandering pernicious propaganda for pecuniary profit and political power. They are the “dog in the manger”. The corroding effect of their subtle intrigue is slowly but surely disintegrating the moral fiber of the nation. This danger to the Christian faith cannot be overestimated. This peril to the nation should not be under- estimated. The Christian clergy must remain alerted to it.

The international “crime of crimes” of all history, that reprehensible iniquity in which this nation played the major role, was committed in Palestine almost totally as a result of the interference of the United States in that situation on behalf solely of the Zionist world-wide organization with its headquarters in New York City. The interference of the United States in that situation on behalf of the aggressors illustrates the power exerted upon the domestic and foreign policies of this government by the “male prostitutes” fearlessly functioning on behalf of the Zionist conspirators. It is the blackest page in our history.

The responsibility for that un-Christian, non-Christian and anti-Christian “cause” can be honestly deposited on the door-step of the Christian clergy. They must assume the full guilt for that inhumane and unholy crime committed in the name of Christian “charity”. Sunday after Sunday, year in and year out, the Christian clergy dinned into the ears of 150,000,000 Christians who go to church regularly that Christians must regard it as their “Christian duty” to support the Zionist conspiracy for the conquest of Palestine. Well, we “sowed a wind”, now we will “reap a whirlwind”.

The 150,000,000 Christians in the United States were “high pressured” by the Christian clergy to give their unqualified support to the Zionist program to “repatriate” to their “homeland” in Palestine the so-called or self-styled “Jews” in eastern Europe who were the descendants of the Khazars. Christians were exhorted by the Christian clergy to regard the so-called or self-styled “Jews” in eastern Europe as God’s “chosen people” and Palestine as their “Promised Land”. But they knew better all the time. It was a case of cupidity not stupidity you can be sure.

As a direct result of the activities of the “male prostitutes” on behalf of the Zionist program, and contrary to all international law, to justice and to equity, anything to the contrary notwithstanding, the 150,000,000 Christians in the United States, with few exceptions, demanded that the Congress of the United States use the prestige and the power of this nation, diplomatic, economic and military, to guarantee the successful outcome of the Zionist program for the conquest of Palestine. This was done and the Zionists conquered Palestine. We are responsible.

It is a well-established and an undeniable historic fact that the active participation of the United States in the conquest of Palestine, on behalf of the Zionists, was the factor responsible for the conquest of Palestine by the Zionists. Without the active participation of the United States on behalf of the Zionists it is certain that the Zionists would never have attempted the conquest of Palestine by force of arms. Palestine today would be an independent sovereign country under a form of government established by self-determination of the lawful and legal Palestinians. This was aborted by the payment of countless millions of dollars to Christian “male prostitutes” by Zionists on a scale difficult for the uninitiated to even imagine.

With your kind permission anticipated, I beg to respectfully and sincerely now submit to you here my comments on several passages in your latest article which appeared in the September issue of the A.P.J. Bulletin under the headline “News and Views of Jews”. Deep down in my heart, my dear Dr. Goldstein, I truly feel that I can make a modest contribution towards the big success I wish you in the valuable work you are attempting, under such discouraging handicaps. My reactions to what you state in your article may prove helpful to you. My comments here were conceived in that spirit. May I suggest that you favor them with your consideration accordingly. I feel that you may be so close to the “trees” that you cannot see the “forest” in its true perspective. You may find a genuinely sincere outsider’s point of view helpful to you in orienting your yesterday’s attitudes to today’s realities and to tomorrow’s seemingly certain probabilities. I believe you will.

You realize, my dear Dr. Goldstein, that all “Laws of Nature” are irrevocable. “Laws of Nature” can neither be amended, suspended or repealed regardless how we fell about them. One of these “Laws of Nature” is fundamentally the basic reason “WHY JEWS BECOME CATHOLICS”, the subtitle in your article which attracted my attention. The “Law of Nature” to which I refer is the law that “TO EVERY ACTION THERE IS AN EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTIONS.” In my respectful opinion that “Law of Nature is the alpha and omega of all questions as to “WHY JEWS BECOME CATHOLICS.”

In your article you make this mystery sound very complicated. However, it really is very simple. The so-called or self-styled “Jews” who become Catholics today are subconsciously reacting to that “Law of Nature”. The conversion to Catholicism of the so-called or self-styled “Jews” is the “EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTION” of that “Law of Nature”. Their conversion is a “REACTION” not an “ACTION”. Can you any longer doubt that after reading these facts?

Catholicism has proven itself spiritually the “EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTION” of the religious worship practiced today under the name “Judaism”, and prior to that name under the names “Talmudism” and “Pharisaism”. What is spiritually conspicuous in Catholicism is conspicuous by its absence in so-called “Judaism”. What is spiritually conspicuous in so-called “Judaism” is conspicuous by its absence in Catholicism, thank God. Anything which may be said by anyone to the contrary notwithstanding, Catholicism and so-called “Judaism” are at the opposite extremes of the spiritual spectrum.

Our subconscious mind never sleeps. It remains awake all the while the conscious mind is asleep. This subconscious mind of so-called or self-styled “Jews” is “WHY JEWS BECOME CATHOLICS”. The more spiritually sensitive subconscious minds of the so-called or self-styled “Jews” for 2000 years has been seeking a spiritually secure beach-head as a refuge from the terror of the Talmud. After a lifetime breathing the atmosphere of the Talmud so-called or self-styled “Jews” found Catholicism a wholesome and refreshing change of spiritual climate. They could not resist the spiritual force of the “EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTION” WHICH ATTRACTED THEM TO CATHOLICISM.

Catholicism supplied a sacred sanctuary for the more spiritually sensitive subconscious mind of the so-called or self- styled “Jew” seeking security in his escape from the Talmud. Before sailing into the safe port of Catholicism the subconscious mind of the more spiritually sensitive so-called or self-styled “Jews” would embark upon that voyage of their more courageous co-religionists but for one reason. They fear reprisals by their co- religionists.

In your article you mention just a few of the many penalties imposed by reactionary so-called or self-styled “Jews” upon their co-religionists who become converts to Catholicism. Conversion to Catholicism has even deprived many former so-called or self-styled “Jews” from earning their living. Many families faced starvation for that reason. A convert to Catholicism must be ready and willing to suffer the economic, social and political hardships his former co- religionists will make him pay as the price for the spiritual wealth he will acquire with conversion to Catholicism.

Investigation by you will convince you that so-called or self-styled “Jews” never turn spiritually to Catholicism “BECAUSE SUCH WAS THE JEWISH RELIGION: BECAUSE SUCH IS THE CATHOLIC RELIGION”, as you state in your article. A so-called or self-styled “Jew” might question the wisdom of conversion from the original to a copy of the original. Inasmuch as so-called “Judaism” is a modern name for “Talmudism”, and “Talmudism” is a name given to the ancient practice of “Pharisaism”, how can you reconcile what you state that “. . . SUCH WAS THE JEWISH RELIGION: . . . SUCH IS THE CATHOLIC RELIGION”.

Several so-called or self-styled “Jews” who were recently converted to Catholicism are my personal friends. Not one of those whom I have asked became a Catholic because they felt “THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS THE JEWISH CHURCH GLORIFIED”, as you state in your article. What “JEWISH CHURCH” they ask me? I am unable to answer. What “JEWISH CHURCH” I ask you? “Pharisaism”? “Talmudism”? Surely you would not venture the opinion that the Catholic Church is “Pharisaism” or “Talmudism” now “GLORIFIED” as Catholicism, would you?

It must be quite apparent to you now that so-called or self- styled “Jews” who became converts to Catholicism do not believe that the Catholic Church, as you state in your article, “IS THE CHURCH OF JEWISH CONVERTS AND THEIR DESCENDANTS”. They do not regard Jesus as a “CONVERT” to the Catholic Church. You include Jesus as a “CONVERT” to the Catholic Church, in your article. In your article you state, “FIRST CAME CHRIST, THE JEW OF JEWS”. I never heard that designation before. Is it original? Nor will converted so-called or self-styled “Jews” concur at all with “THEN CAME THE APOSTLES, ALL JEWS”, as you also state in your article. There is unquestionably too big an area of disagreement here to disregard the views of those who have become converts to Catholicism. Nor can these converts to Catholicism be made to believe as truth “THEN CAME THE THOUSANDS OF THE FIRST MEMBERS OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, WHO WERE JEWS”, as you state in your article under discussion here.

My dear Dr. Goldstein, as a former so-called or self-styled “Jew” for almost half your life, when you became a convert to Catholicism did you do so for the reasons you state in your article “WHY JEWS BECOME CATHOLICS”? That would be difficult for me to believe in spite of the further statements you make in your article “IN FACT THERE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN A CATHOLIC CHURCH WERE IT NOT FOR THE JEWS”. That statement appears incredible in view of incontestable facts, but these facts may not have been available to you when you made it.

If so-called or self-styled “Jews” believed what you state in your article they would undoubtedly prefer to stay put spiritually in their “JEWISH CHURCH”, by which you mean no doubt so- called “Judaism”. They would query why Catholics expected them to leave their “JEWISH CHURCH” to enter the Catholic Church. It might appear more logical to expect Catholics to return to the original of the Catholic Church, the “JEWISH CHURCH”, or so- called “Judaism”. On the basis of what you state, that would not be inconsistent.

You take away my breath when you further state “CATHOLICISM WOULD NOT EXIST WERE IT NOT FOR JUDAISM”. That leaves very little for me to say after writing these 62 pages of facts and comments. In a certain sense there is certain sense to what you state if you feel that the existence of so-called “Judaism”, in the time of Jesus and since then, created the necessity for the existence of Catholicism. But in no sense can the Catholic Church be adjudicated the projection of “Pharisaism”, “Talmudism”, or so-called “Judaism”.

We should get together in person to go into this matter more fully. I hope you will extend that privilege to me in the not too distant future. In closing this letter I sincerely request that you bear in mind while reading this letter Galatians, 4:16, “Am I therefor become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?” And to this I add, “I hope not”. I hope that we shall continue to be the very best of friends. If the Christian faith is to be rescued from its dedicated enemies we must all join hands and form a “human lifeline”. We must pull together, not in different directions. We must “bury the hatchet” but not in each other’s heads.

Looking forward with pleasant anticipation to the delight of meeting with you in person whenever you find it convenient and agreeable for yourself, and awaiting your early reply for which I take this opportunity to thank you in advance, and with best wishes for your continued good health and success, please believe me to be,

Most respectfully and very sincerely,

Benjamin H. Freedman

The ACLU Get One Right

Every so often, even the ACLU lines up correctly.  This is one such instance:

http://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/senators-demand-military-lock-american-citizens-battlefield-they-define-being/

Senators Demand the Military Lock Up American Citizens in a “Battlefield” They Define as Being Right Outside Your Window

While nearly all Americans head to family and friends to celebrate Thanksgiving, the Senate is gearing up for a vote on Monday or Tuesday that goes to the very heart of who we are as Americans. The Senate will be voting on a bill that will direct American military resources not at an enemy shooting at our military in a war zone, but at American citizens and other civilians far from any battlefield — even people in the United States itself.

Senators need to hear from you, on whether you think your front yard is part of a “battlefield” and if any president can send the military anywhere in the world to imprison civilians without charge or trial.

The Senate is going to vote on whether Congress will give this president—and every future president — the power to order the military to pick up and imprison without charge or trial civilians anywhere in the world. Even Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) raised his concerns about the NDAA detention provisions during last night’s Republican debate. The power is so broad that even U.S. citizens could be swept up by the military and the military could be used far from any battlefield, even within the United States itself.

The worldwide indefinite detention without charge or trial provision is in S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act bill, which will be on the Senate floor on Monday. The bill was drafted in secret by Sens. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.) and passed in a closed-door committee meeting, without even a single hearing.

I know it sounds incredible. New powers to use the military worldwide, even within the United States? Hasn’t anyone told the Senate that Osama bin Laden is dead, that the president is pulling all of the combat troops out of Iraq and trying to figure out how to get combat troops out of Afghanistan too? And American citizens and people picked up on American or Canadian or British streets being sent to military prisons indefinitely without even being charged with a crime. Really? Does anyone think this is a good idea? And why now?

The answer on why now is nothing more than election season politics. The White House, the Secretary of Defense, and the Attorney General have all said that the indefinite detention provisions in the National Defense Authorization Act are harmful and counterproductive. The White House has even threatened a veto. But Senate politics has propelled this bad legislation to the Senate floor.

But there is a way to stop this dangerous legislation. Sen. Mark Udall (D-Colo.) is offering the Udall Amendment that will delete the harmful provisions and replace them with a requirement for an orderly Congressional review of detention power. The Udall Amendment will make sure that the bill matches up with American values.

In support of this harmful bill, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) explained that the bill will “basically say in law for the first time that the homeland is part of the battlefield” and people can be imprisoned without charge or trial “American citizen or not.” Another supporter, Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.) also declared that the bill is needed because “America is part of the battlefield.”

The solution is the Udall Amendment; a way for the Senate to say no to indefinite detention without charge or trial anywhere in the world where any president decides to use the military. Instead of simply going along with a bill that was drafted in secret and is being jammed through the Senate, the Udall Amendment deletes the provisions and sets up an orderly review of detention power. It tries to take the politics out and put American values back in.

In response to proponents of the indefinite detention legislation who contend that the bill “applies to American citizens and designates the world as the battlefield,” and that the “heart of the issue is whether or not the United States is part of the battlefield,” Sen. Udall disagrees, and says that we can win this fight without worldwide war and worldwide indefinite detention.

The senators pushing the indefinite detention proposal have made their goals very clear that they want an okay for a worldwide military battlefield, that even extends to your hometown. That is an extreme position that will forever change our country.

Now is the time to stop this bad idea. Please urge your senators to vote YES on the Udall Amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act.

Americans seem to either have a very short memory, or they are being hypnotized.

Over the weekend, key “polls” reported Newt Gingrich actually leading the GOP field for the 2012 Presidential nomination.  Perhaps “Illuminati Appointment” is more appropriate.

Never mind that Gingrich’s “campaign” had been rocked with scandal, amid the resignations of key campaign figures.  Like the proverbial Phoenix rising from the ashes, an energized Gingrich campaign picked up a very important endorsement from New Hampshire’s largest newspaper, the New Hampshire Union Leader.   With this “conservative” mass media organ leading the way – and with the newest “polls” helping to hoodwink the masses, Gingrich has to be considered the GOP frontrunner.

Earlier this year on The Story Behind the Story radio show, I discussed the hidden secrets of “Newt” (Slimy Salamander) Gingrich.   As far as I can tell, only my fellow patriot Texe Marrs picked up on the fact that Gingrich, supposedly at one time a “Born Again Christian” suddenly “converted” to Roman Catholicism and the Jesuit (Jewish) secret society called Opus Dei.  Included in this post is Texe’s incredibly well-done expose for your review once again.

From the website

http://www.texemarrs.com/102010/choice_for_2012.htm

Exclusive Intelligence Examiner Report

Texe Marrs

Newt Gingrich is Their Chosen as the Republican Party’s Nominee for President

The Illuminati Choice for 2012

“In no sense is Newt Gingrich a conservative or even a traditional Republican. He was a fellow at the neocon (Zionist warmonger) criminal organizations… Newt Gingrich has also attended Bohemian Grove where he rubbed elbows with occultists and male prostitutes…he is a demonstrated liar.”

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com (April 23, 2010)

Two years in advance, billionaire Jews who comprise the inner circle of the Republican Party leadership have chosen the nominee of the Party to run for President in the upcoming 2012 elections. Newt Gingrich, premier neocon and corrupt former House Speaker, has been given the nod. Already a campaign war chest of over $20 million has been gathered for Gingrich’s use. Eventually, up to a quarter billion dollars will be amassed.

Why Gingrich? Others in contention include former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, Virginia Congressman Eric Cantor, former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, and former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee. Palin has been told she must continue to be the new feminine “Jerry Falwell,” sweetheart of the Judaizer throngs in the Christian evangelical community. In that capacity, Palin well serves the elite, rousing the Christian right to support radical Israeli causes, such as a major future war against Iran and continued brutality against Israel’s hapless neighbors, the Palestinians and the Lebanese.

Mitt Romney may well end up as the GOP’s vice presidential candidate. His attractive physical features, the elite believe, will bring in female voters to support a Gingrich-Romney ticket.

Mike Huckabee has already been amply rewarded for his ingenious 2008 campaign in which he split the conservative vote, enabling the liberal neocon and Rothschild favorite, the doddering John McCain, to slide in as the Republican’s man for the White House. That, of course, in turn, insured that Barack Obama would win in the general election, since most traditional Republicans, disgusted at being forced to choose between tweedledee (McCain) and tweedledum (Obama), simply stayed home on election day.

Eric Cantor, a young House Representative from Virginia, is also being boosted by the Party pros as a potential VP choice. Inept and incompetent as he is, Cantor, after all, is a Jew. The billionaire Jews who own the Republican Party are eager to see one of their own sitting just a heartbeat away from the Oval Office. Then, at the crack of an assassin’s bullet, the President could be slain and—ka-ching!—the cash registers would be rung as President Cantor, an ardent Zionist Jew and Israel-firster, is sworn in.

Gingrich a Loyal Zionist Puppet

 

Opus Dei work image

This Opus Dei image is said to represent the work required of its members. Newt Gingrich is now linked to Opus Dei.

For now, though, it’s all Newt Gingrich. He has been ultra-loyal both to the Jewish money men and to the secretive Vatican group Opus Dei, another group of money men. A fanatical Israel supporter, Gingrich is continually pimping for more wars and death in the Middle East. He supported the Bush torture and gulags and can be counted on to siphon trillions from the U.S. Treasury into the coffers of Wall Street’s Jewish bankers and ponzi scheme artists.To prepare Gingrich for his role as Rothschild front man in 2012, Newt recently “converted” to Catholicism. In February, 2010, some 500 Catholic millionaires, initiates of the Opus Dei affiliate Legatus, met in Dana Point, California to honor Gingrich and former President and Jew-Catholic loyalist George W. Bush. Gingrich was lauded by the group for his conversion and even gave his “Christian testimony” regarding his leaving the Southern Baptist denomination to become a convert to “Holy Mother Church.” His new wife—his third—was on hand.

Opus Dei Headquarters in New York

The influential Catholic Order, Opus Dei, has branches across the globe. This is Opus Dei’s U.S.A. headquarters in New York City. Note the red color, reminiscent of the prophecies in the book of Revelation which refer to the scarlet colored Beast and the Woman who wears scarlet and purple.

The Jewish Jesuits

Also present was Jesuit Father Robert Spitzer, a Jew who is Chairman of the Vatican’s Magis Institute and Spitzer Center. The Jesuit Order is, in fact, a crypto-Jewish organization and Spitzer is one of the many Jews who claims to have converted to Catholicism. He and the debauched Gingrich must have really been laughing up their sleeves.

Legatus has some 1,800 members, with a heavy presence in the United Sates, Canada, and Ireland. Gingrich thrilled the attendees in California by showing them the new film his company, Gingrich Productions, has produced about the “exemplary life of the late Pope John Paul II.” The theme of the Legatus conference was “Challenging the Culture.”

Gingrich’s Third Wave Plan for America

And just what kind of “culture” does Mr. Gingrich want to see take hold in America? In my insightful, eye-opening book, Circle of Intrigue, I unmask the traitorous anti-American intentions of Gingrich and his associates in crime. “I have an enormous political ambition,” Gingrich told the Washington Post. “I want to shift the entire planet and I’m doing it.”

This planetary shift of Gingrich’s takes a number of dangerous forms. It is, in fact, all part of the revolutionary socialist movement which Gingrich calls the “Third Wave.” The Plan calls for nothing less than to radically change America into a fascist “paradise” with citizens stripped of constitutional rights. What is planned is a virtual high tech prison, an Orwellian Police State superintended by the self-appointed “Masters.”

Creating a New Civilization

Newt Gingrich

Futures Research Quarterly

Newt Gingrich former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, strongly endorsed the book, Creating a New Civilization, by Alvin and Heidi Toffler. That notorious book, in turn, parrots the scheme of the Illuminati to destroy the Constitution of the United States and set up a Fascist World Order. Significantly, Newt Gingrich is a member of the CFR and also the World Future Society. As shown on one of their publications, the logo of the World Future Society appears strikingly similar to a circular, 6-6-6 configuration.

Gingrich has not been shy about presenting his “Third Wave” Plan. He flatly states that his goal is to end the old America forever. Insiders Alvin and Heidi Toffler (Jews) enlisted the endorsement of Gingrich and the three set forth this plan in the Tofflers’ sinister Illuminist volume, Creating a New Civilization. Gingrich actually wrote the foreword for this ungodly, anti-American book. Here are just a few of Third Wave principles espoused in the book by the Tofflers and Gingrich:

The time has come for the next great step forward in American politics. It is not a matter of Democrats versus Republicans, or of left and right…but something more significant…a clear distinction between rear-guard politicians who wish to preserve or restore an unworkable past and those who are ready to transition to what we call a “Third Wave” information-age society…

A new civilization is emerging in our lives, and blind men everywhere are trying to suppress it. This new civilization brings with it new family styles, changed ways…a new economy, new political conflicts, and…altered consciousness… Humanity faces a quantum leap forward. This is the meaning of the Third Wave…

Our argument is based on what we call the “revolutionary premise”… The revolutionary premise liberates our intellect and will.

Nationalism is…First Wave. The globalization of business and finance required by advancing Third Wave economies routinely punctures the national “sovereignty” the nationalists hold so dear…

As economies are transformed by the Third Wave, they are compelled to surrender part of their sovereignty… Poets and intellectuals of Third Wave states sing the virtues of a “borderless” world and “planetary consciousness.”

The Third Wave…demassifies culture, values, and morality… There are more diverse religious belief systems.

The Constitution of the United States needs to be reconsidered and altered…to create a whole new structure of government… Building a Third Wave civilization on the wreckage of Second Wave institutions involves the design of new, more appropriate political structures… The system that served us so well must, in its turn, die and be replaced.

Gingrich’s Goals: Smash Christianity and End American Sovereignty

To say that these proposals mesh with the Plan and Great Work of the Satanists of the Illuminati hierarchy is a gross understatement. Even Barack Obama and his cohorts do not have the boldness and the gall to so clearly elaborate the goals of the elite. Gingrich and Toffler openly declare their goals: to smash Christianity, end American sovereignty, erase all national borders, wreck our entire existing civilization and kill off America’s 200-plus year constitutional history forever. Gingrich is a Communist revolutionary who dares to state outright that he intends to destroy the United States and set up a totalitarian New World Order.

Gingrich Lionized by the Republican Party

Yet amazingly, Texe Marrs is apparently the only man in the world who has reported on this atrocity of Newt Gingrich’s. The man continues to be lionized by the Republican Party. He is a frequent “talking head”—indeed, he is a paid contributor—for Fox News TV channel, and everywhere the elite applaud his every move! And now, if our Jewish controllers have their way, this vicious traitor to the American way of life will be the Republican Party’s standard-bearer in the sweepstakes for the American presidency.

Obama Being Watched

For the moment, Barack Obama is doing just fine as far as the Illuminati fraternity is concerned. His Administration, guided by Jewish swindlers like Rahm Emanuel, David Axelrod, Timothy Geithner, and Ben Bernanke, has loaded up the globalists banks with over 37 trillion dollars of stolen taxpayers’ money. They were able to push through the greatest socialist scheme in American history with the “Obamacare” scam, and so things are going swimmingly well for the super-rich who monitor things behind-the-scenes. But if Obama should falter, they will not hesitate in 2012 to replace the half-blood prince of Chicago with a more promising puppet—a Gingrich, for example, or even a Palin, Romney, or Cantor.

Hillary Always an Option

There’s also the ominous specter of Hillary always lurking in the shadows. President Bill Clinton’s eight year reign is a very fond memory for the elite. Why not a re-run with lesbian flourishes, courtesy of the ubiquitous Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton? The best part, in their thinking, is that Hillary is a Jew. She even told The New Yorker magazine that her grandmother spoke Yiddish in her home and cooked Jewish delicacies in the Rodham (her maiden name) kitchen. Now that’s a good fit for President in Rothschild’s eyes. So, as both the lesbian, Wiccan hag friends of Hillary and the Masonic occultists of the Jewish Kehilla might say, “So mote it be!”

Keep up to date with Texe on
(Log in and search for texe.marrs1)


Click to view excerpts from Texe’s latest blockbuster documentary Rothschild’s Choice, then order your copy today!

Order Now
90 Minute DVD • $25


Power of Prophecy proudly offers the following best-selling books. Order your copy today!

Conspiracy World

Conspiracy World

432 Pages ~ $35.00


Mysterious Monuments

Mysterious Monuments

624 Pages ~ $35.00


Codex Magica

Codex Magica

624 Pages ~ $35.00


The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine

320 Pages ~ $20.00


Frontman: Obama’s Darkest Secrets Revealed

112 Pages ~ $20.00


Behind Communism

101 Pages ~ $10.00


Marx and Satan

143 Pages ~ $12.00


Power of Prophecy proudly offers these best-selling videos. Order your copy today!

Couldn’t make it to Austin to attend the informative Liberty & Truth Conference put on by Power of Prophecy and American Free Press? Or, perhaps you want to remember the finer points presented by Texe, Pat, Joyce, Mark, and Michael. Here is your chance to own a piece of history.

Click Here to Order Your Copy Today


Click to view excerpts from Texe’s blockbuster documentary Cauldron of Abaddon, then order your copy today in either VHS or DVD!

Order Now
60 Minutes • VHS • or • DVD • $25


Secret Societies and the Illuminati

60 Minutes ~ $20.00

VHS or DVD


Power of Prophecy proudly offers these best-selling audios. Order your copies today!

The Hidden Cabal Behind America’s Implosion

2 Hours  ~ $12.00

Tape or CD


Obama’s Anti-American Outrage!

60 Minutes ~ $8.00

Tape or CD


The Illuminati’s Oriental Express

60 Minutes ~ $8.00

Tape or CD


Triad of Evil

60 Minutes ~ $8.00

Tape or CD


Rothschild’s Black Gold Empire

60 Minutes ~ $8.00

Tape or CD


Planet Petroleum

60 Minutes ~ $8.00

Tape or CD


Ways of the Serpent

2-Hour Set ~ $12.00

Tape or CD


Political Chameleons and Other Lying Lizards

60 Minutes ~ $8.00

Tape or CD


Unmasking the Spooks, Spies, and Spidery Connection…

60 Minutes ~ $8.00

Tape or CD


We are so very thankful to those of you who give to Power of Prophecy. You are a valued member of our end-time crusade for Truth and Righteousness on behalf of our Savior Jesus Christ. Click here for more info!


RevGenetics products harness the power of Resveratrol, the “red wine molecule” that is well-known in the medical field for its potential to help combat cancer, viral infections, and the effects of diabetes, as well as its anti-aging potential. Click here for more info!

Important Information You Need
Click the link below to Order Now!

The Illuminati’s Presidential Choice for 2012—For Now It’s Newt Gingrich vs. Barack Obama

The Illuminati's Presidential Choice for 2012

Texe evaluates the presidential line-up for 2012. He exposes the unAmerican traitor Newt Gingrich’s outrageous proposals to throw out the U.S. Constitution, set up a world government, and radically reshape American culture into the more desirable “Jewish Utopia.” Gingrich proposes also the end of Christianity as a “Third Wave” sweeps away all vestiges of Americanism and terminates old-fashioned morality. Gingrich’s plan is for a “New Civilization.” Incredibly, the controlled media have totally bottled up this satanic agenda. Also explored: The possibility of Cantor, Palin, Romney, Huckabee, or a dark horse getting the nod in 2012. And, if Barack Obama continues to falter as America’s leader, will Hillary be brought in to carry the Democrat Party’s banner as White House candidate in 2012?

Dr. Sowell Comments on OWS — SHORT AND SWEET!

Thomas Sowell (born June 30, 1930) is an American economistsocial theorist, political philosopher, and author. A National Humanities Medal winner, he advocates laissez-faire economics and writes from a libertarian perspective. He is currently a Rose and Milton Friedman Senior Fellow on Public Policy at theHoover Institution at Stanford University.
Sowell was born in North Carolina, but grew up in HarlemNew York. He dropped out of high school, and served in the United States Marine Corps during the Korean War. He had received a bachelor’s degree from Harvard University in 1958 and a master’s degree from Columbia University in 1959. In 1968, he earned his doctorate degree in economics from the University of Chicago.
Dr. Sowell has served on the faculties of several universities, including Cornell and University of California, Los Angeles, and worked for “think tanks” such as the Urban Institute. Since 1980 he has worked at the Hoover Institution. He is the author of more than 30 books.
By Dr. Sowell
 The current Occupy Wall Street movement is the best illustration to date of what President Barack Obama’s America looks like. It is an America where the lawless, unaccomplished, ignorant and incompetent rule. It is an America where those who have sacrificed nothing pillage and destroy the lives of those who have sacrificed greatly.

It is an America where history is rewritten to honor dictators, murderers and thieves. It is an America where violence, racism, hatred, class warfare and murder are all promoted as acceptable means of overturning the American civil society.

It is an America where humans have been degraded to the level of animals: defecating in public, having sex in public, devoid of basic hygiene. It is an America where the basic tenets of a civil society, including faith, family, a free press and individual rights, have been rejected. It is an America where our founding documents have been shredded and, with them, every person’s guaranteed liberties.

It is an America where, ultimately, great suffering will come to the American people, but the rulers like Obama, Michelle Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Joe Biden, Jesse Jackson, Louis Farrakhan, liberal college professors, union bosses and other loyal liberal/Communist Party members will live in opulent splendor.

It is the America that Obama and the Democratic Party have created with the willing assistance of the American media, Hollywood , unions, universities, the Communist Party of America, the Black Panthers and numerous anti-American foreign entities.

Barack Obama has brought more destruction upon this country in four years than any other event in the history of our nation, but it is just the beginning of what he and his comrades are capable of.

The Occupy Wall Street movement is just another step in their plan for the annihilation of America .

“Socialism, in general, has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it.”

Thomas Sowell

Pedophilia a Doctrine of the Kaballah and the Talmud!

Thanks to studying a number of obscure books on the Kaballah and the Talmud, I can say with 100% assurance that pedophilia and child sexual abuse is most definitely a mainstay of certain Khazarian Rabbis and Talmudists in America and Israel.  This, along with RITUAL MURDER is their deep, dark secret.

Consider:

Last year, top Israeli Rabbi Moti Elon was indicted by police for sex crimes against minors. “Far from being the rabbi of an obscure Hasidic sect, the charismatic Elon is a high-profile leader, educator and media personality, representing the more mainstream religious Zionists and former head of the renowned HaKotel (Western Wall) Yeshiva. He comes from a family of high achievers in law, politics and academia that has drawn comparisons with the Kennedy clan” according to Israeli newspapers.

In 2006, Elon was restricted by an organization of rabbis in his contact with students, after confessing to sexual relationships with male students. Yet he continued to act as the president of a Talmudic academy in Jerusalem and did not fully honor the agreement. One Ha’aretz commentary says Elon “managed to turn himself into almost a kind of saint” –a fate certainly to be envied by American religious figures turned pedophiles.

Dr. Aviad Hacohen, dean of the Sha’arei Mishpat College, in 2007 reported that “95% of sexual offences in Jerusalem were performed by the religious and haredi.” “Several years ago, I began looking into the issue on a data-based level,” said Hacohen. “It turned out that the law enforcement authorities, both the police and the prosecutor’s office, were aware of the data but refused to expose it based on sectorial affiliation in order to avoid branding a certain group in the population…”   This is exactly the testimony of ex-FBI Bureau Chief Ted Gunderson when asked why indictments and arrests were not being made.   He flatly told me it was because the evidence pointed to “top Jewish Rabbis, and powerful Catholic and MORMON leaders!”

Since 2006, cases of Jewish leadership figures in Orthodox and Ultra-Orthodox Judaism being involved in homosexuality or pedophilia scandals continue to mount not only in Israel, but in New York, where allegations of “pimping” young boys to not only Rabbis, but crypto-Jew Catholic Priests had been the norm for many decades, if not centuries.

Now you know the BASIS for my allegations that the Penn State saga is connected not only to the Franklin Coverup in Nebraska, but also to world-wide SECRET SOCIETIES wielding great power and influence.

Christians need to rise up and stop this NOW!!!

Sandusky Part of Illuminati Pedophile Network

November 13, 2011

franklin_coverup_ny_times_cover.jpg

By Hayden Fox
(henrymakow.com)

The Penn State-Jerry Sandusky scandal may just be getting started.   Undisclosed allegations implicate Sandusky in a massive homosexual pedophile ring.  There is a report Sandusky “pimped out” boys to donors and that list includes powerful politicians.

The Penn State scandal is part of a worldwide Illuminati pedophile network  where powerful homosexuals prey on vulnerable youths. This includes the Franklin Cover-Up (1988-1991) where boys from Omaha Nebraska’s Boys Town were trafficked to Washington politicians.

It includes the 1996  Detroux Affair in Brussels when a sex predator serial killer implicated much of the Belgian elite and many European aristocrats.

It includes the Casa Pia scandal. Casa Pia is state orphanage in Portugal. Witnesses broke silence in 2004. Since then 800 witnesses came forward in the longest trial in Portuguese history.  Several elite members were convicted last year of involvement with a pedophile ring dating back several decades.

The convicted included Portuguese TV anchorman Carlos Cruz, former Casa Pia governor Manuel Abrantes, and former UNESCO ambassador Jorge Ritto.

jerry-sandusky.jpgPenn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky (left) was indicted on 40 counts of sexual assault on boys ages ten to 15.  The indictment is the result of a three-year investigation triggered by a mother pressing charges of sexual harassment of her 15 year old son.

The smoking gun was an affidavit by Mike McQueary, another assistant coach who walked in on Sandusky anally raping a 10 year old boy in the Penn State locker room.

The witness informed head coach Paterno.  The only action taken by top school officials was to tell Sandusky not to bring his victims on campus.

None of the coaches or school officials reported a thing to police.
How could an assistant coach caught penetrating a 10 year old boy get away with it?  Why did the university protect him?

THE SECOND MILE FOUNDATION

Sandusky founded Second Mile in 1977 as a “foster home dedicated to helping troubled boys with absent or dysfunctional families.”

That’s what members of NAMBLA (North American Man Boy Love Association) would call a “chicken ranch”.

The victim in the 2002 anal rape in the Penn State locker room was a boy housed at Second Mile.

Here it gets interesting – “The Second Mile Foundation was recognized as one of President Bush’s 1000 Points of Light.  Marvin P. Bush is on the National Collegiate Athletic Association Board of Directors ”

This is how child trafficking in plain sight works in America.

Children and teenage minors without parental care become ‘wards of the State’.  It means CPS (Child Protective Services) has custody of them and juvenile court judges can hand them over to whomever they deem fit.

If you’ve ever known people that were trapped in the ‘Juvie’ system, they’ll tell you rapes and exploitation happen all the time, and rarely does anybody get in trouble.

schaefer.jpgIn 2004, Georgia State Senator Nancy Schaefer found evidence of deep corruption within the Federal  ‘child protective services’ system which handles children designated as ‘wards of the State’.

She reported, “The Adoption and the Safe Families Act, set in motion by President Bill Clinton, offers cash “bonuses” to the states for every child they adopted out [to] foster care. In order to receive the “adoption incentive bonuses” local child protective services need more children.”   Clinton’s Federal changes to CPS and the Juvenile Justice System rewards corruption and shelters molesters.  She realized the Federal government has been part of the international trafficking of children.

Gives new insight into the Bush education initiative, “No child left behind”…….or was it, “No behind left alone?”

Schaefer was ‘suicided’ in March 2010, after speaking at the World Conference of Families in Amsterdam in 2009.

Though foster care is usually living hell for children trapped in the CPS system, high profile group homes are often a wonderful reprieve that offer children a safe haven and real chances to aspire to a decent future.

busgannon.jpgBut some are owned and operated as fronts for the elite pedophile rings.

Sandusky was charged with sexually abusing eight boys over a 15-year period. During the  entire time, Sandusky was running a foundation for “throw-away boys”.

MEDIA WON’T MENTION THE WORD “HOMOSEXUAL

Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) issued the bizarre statement that “a suspected pedophile backed by a powerful institution was allowed to have foster children, while same-sex couples, who can provide loving families, are often denied that opportunity.”

According to LGBT logic, Sandusky isn’t a homosexual – he’s a pedophile heterosexual. GLAAD stressed that Sandusky is married and that most pedophile cases involve  “straight, married men.” Thus they try to transfer the stigma of gay pedophilia to heterosexuals!

Let’s be honest. Heterosexuals are repulsed by same-sexual activity.  Saying that men that rape boys aren’t homosexual is absurd.

A homosexual demands intimate contact with members of the same sex.  The history of homosexuality carries with it a strong connection to pederasty, and a disproportionate link between homosexuality and pedophilia. Why else are most child molestation victims boys when less than 2% percent of the population is homosexual?

The mass media is afraid of the “H” word because it is run by the Illuminati, and it is afraid of gay lobbies.

CONCLUSION

The Illuminati use pedophilia to blackmail and control their members. Perhaps the public can wield the stick.

The Penn State scandal demonstrates that the Illuminati are made extremely vulnerable by their sadistic pedophile practices. So far they have been able to cover up the extent of this network. Further investigation and public pressure could expose and neutralize more Illuminati perverts.

There are many more Jerry Sandusky’s in the Halls of Power, and this is a  way to identify and remove them.

Related – Masculine Vs. Effeminate Homosexuals

Victims Plan Lawsuits Against Penn State

Penn State Football Staff Must Go

American Teenager Serviced Royals

Reprint of 1999 Article by John Torell

Sometimes you come across the writings of another author that mirrors your own research and study completely.   So it is with this 1999 evangelical warning to all Americans.

In light of the CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE  – PENN STATE SAGA – this becomes especially relevant.

Enjoy!

 

European-American Evangelistic Crusades, Inc.

 

July 1999 Newsletter

 

John S. Torell

In my June 1999 newsletter, I disclosed that the Russian revolution was in reality a Jewish Zionist takeover of Russia. I am sure this must have shocked some of the readers, who have little historical knowledge. In order to correct this possible lack of knowledge, I will use this month’s newsletter to inform you more about this matter.

HOW THE WORLD GOVERNMENT RULES THE NATIONS
For many years, how the World Government rules the nations has been a secret that I have not been able to discover. I have been able to understand the moves of this secret ruling elite, but no one outside of their circles has been able to understand how national governments can be forced to turn against themselves and do the bidding of these evil people.

During the last two years a number of books have come into my possession, including documents from different places in the world. The books have been written by different kinds of people, a number of them are Jewish and their books are only distributed in Jewish circles, and not available to Gentiles. Others are strongly antiCommunistic, having access to earlier closed records in the Soviet Union and in former East European communist nations. Then there are written records by former government officials and intelligence officers, who have used declassified records to tell the world what really happened behind the scenes during the last few hundred years. There is also the work of historical scholars, who have spent a lifetime digging up the facts and presenting them in book form.

It has taken me some 27 years of research, and then praying over the information, before I have come to what I consider, THE MOST DANGEROUS TRUTH OF WHICH TO HAVE KNOWLEDGE! God has strongly impressed upon me that the believers in Christ must have access to this knowledge, as we are rapidly moving to the time in which the Antichrist will reign.

DOES THE BIBLE SUPPORT THE IDEA OF A WORLD GOVERNMENT?
Any born again believer in Christ, who reads the Bible from Genesis to the book of Revelation, cannot escape the teaching that God has written down. God has told us in the Bible, that someday before Jesus comes back to the earth, there will be a period when the earth shall be ruled by Satan himself, through a man who is called
“The Beast, The Son of Perdition, the Man of Sin, the Wicked, the Antichrist, the Abomination of Desolation, and a Vile Person.”

 

God began to speak to the prophet Daniel about this coming time on the earth some 550 years before Christ (Daniel 11:21-39). From the writings of Daniel we are given some insight on this last world ruler. He will be of Jewish descent and a practicing homosexual. Jesus tells us that this wicked ruler shall descend upon Jerusalem, and that he will occupy a Jewish temple in that city (Matthew 24:1-24). This is detailed by the apostle Paul in II Thessalonians 2:1-12. Since the temple in Jerusalem that Jesus visited when he walked in the flesh on the earth was destroyed in 70 AD, we know that one of the signs of the Antichrist will be that a new Jewish temple will once more be built in Jerusalem.

The kingdom of the Antichrist will be a political alliance of many nations that will give their power to this evil man (Revelation 17:1-18). Its financial strength will come from global trading (Revelation 18:23). The Man of Sin will receive his power from Satan, he will use war to enforce his rule; he will mandate Satan worship as the state religion and there will be total control over all business so that no human being can buy or sell without having taken the mark of the Beast in their forehead or right hand (Revelation 13:1-18).

Knowing these facts from the Bible, we can now set forth the following definitions for the kingdom of the Antichrist:

  • Its leadership and core group must be Jewish.

  • They must be able to have their own people in all nations of the world.

  • They must have physical political control over the land of Israel.

  • They must be working on world control over all commerce.

  • They must be working on world control over all banking.

  • Somehow they must be able to rule the leaders of all nations in the world.

  • They must be working to merge all religions in the world into one mega religion.

  • They will be very hostile to true believers of Christ.

  • They must develop a military force which no nation can resist and still survive.

  • Food, energy, water, clothing and shelter must be controlled by the forces of the antichrist before they can have control over all people on the earth.

HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE WAITING FOR A MESSIAH?
Most people become emotionally hysterical when the subject of the Jewish people is discussed. Great fear of being “ANTISEMITIC” rolls over the Christians, and they begin to shudder and flee. This is exactly what you have been programmed to feel through the public schools and the media. Asking questions and studying the Bible does not make any person anti-Semitic. As Christians, we should study the Word of God and learn the truth.

There are only two types of people on the earth who believe in the concept of a Messiah. First, the Jewish people have believed this and have been waiting for the Messiah since the day of Abraham. Secondly, the Christians, who are the spiritual children of Abraham, have been waiting, ever since Jesus walked on the earth, for their Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, to come back. What is the difference between the two groups?

When Jesus was born on the earth some 2000 years ago, he was rejected by the Jewish leadership as the Messiah and crucified. His Jewish disciples believed that he was the Messiah, and when he was resurrected on the third day after his death on the cross, the Christian church was born. Thousands upon thousands of Jews living at that time believed that Jesus was the son of God, the Messiah, and they were converted to the Christian faith. Later these Jews spread their faith into other nations, thus bringing the Gentiles into the Christian church.

Judaism, as a religion, is teaching its people that the Messiah they are waiting for is:

  1. Going to be a World Dictator who will set up his throne in Jerusalem and that only Jews are going to be in charge in his kingdom.

  2. Has only come to save Jews and make them, as a nation, world rulers over all Gentile nations.

  3. Will make slaves of the Gentiles whose task in the kingdom will be to serve the Jews.

Christianity teaches that Jesus is the Messiah who first came into the world as the “SUFFERING SERVANT” and who came to die for the sins of all people in the world. Jesus is a Messiah to all nations on the earth, including the Jews. Christians are now waiting for Jesus to return and set up his reign in Jerusalem, but his kingdom will consist of all believers. At that time Jesus will not arrive as a Suffering Servant, but as the King of kings and Lord of lords, and he will take control over all nations, which he shall rule with a “rod of iron.” (Revelation 19:15)

Judaism is divided up into many groups, just like the Christians are. Orthodox Jews believe that the Messiah is going to come in his own divine power and set up the kingdom. Reform or Conservative Judaism does not really believe that there will be a Messiah. Cabalistic Jews believe that there will be a Messiah, but that he can only come if the Cabalistic Jews prepare the way for him.

Most Christians believe that Jesus will not need any help from them to return, but that he shall return with divine power when the appointed time is here.

WHICH GROUP IS PREPARING FOR THE ANTICHRIST?
Jews in general do not believe in an Antichrist, despite what the prophet Daniel said. This teaching about an Antichrist is strongly revealed in the New Testament of the Bible, and it is clearly stated in the first letter of John:

Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world. Hereby know you the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God: And every spirit that confesses not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof you have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world. I John 4:1-3

If you are a born again believer in Christ and believe that the New Testament is part of the Bible, there is only one conclusion that you can come to, and that is that Judaism is the vehicle that Satan will use to bring the Man of Perdition to the world as its dictator.

To those of you who do not know what Judaism teaches, here are the facts: It was the leaders of Judaism that demanded the crucifixion, rejecting Jesus as the Son of God. (Matthew 26:3-5) All Jewish leaders today in the religion of Judaism are strongly rejecting Jesus of Nazareth as the Son of God. They are rejecting that Jesus Christ in the flesh was God. ACCORDING TO THE BIBLE, THAT PLACES JUDAISM IN THE CAMP OF THE ANTICHRIST!

ARE ALL JEWS ACTIVELY WORKING FOR THE ANTICHRIST?
Absolutely not! Of the some 13 million Jews living in the world (1998), only a small percentage are actively working to bring their messiah to the earth. Most Jews are like most Christians; they have never read the Old Testament, many do not attend synagogue services and they are Jews by birth only. However, most Jews have a very strong feeling concerning the physical, political state of Israel and will go to any length to support Israel, regardless of their religious status. Also, having been brought up with a strong teaching emphasis on the killing of Jews by the Nazis during World War II, the average Jew believes that he must support and preserve Judaism as an ethnical and social movement in order to preserve his own life and identity.

Most American Jews belong to either Conservative or Reform Judaism, neither of whom teaches that there is a divine God. Rather, Judaism has become their god and there is no life after death. Since American Jews (some 6 million) make up about half of the Jewish world population, it has a great impact on Judaism.

It is the Cabalistic group in Judaism which is actively working to bring a messiah to the earth. I will give you a brief summary of what they believe, and refer you to several articles I have written in previous issues of The Dove. concerning this subject. (If you have not seen these articles, write us and ask for copies).

It was King Solomon who in his apostasy developed the “hidden religion” within Judaism about 1000 years B.C. It was Solomon who took the number “666” as his identification number (I Kings 10:14), and who built a throne that was designed as “666.” (I Kings 10:18-20). It was Solomon who took the ancient occult teachings and began to develop them into what today is known as the “CABALA.” (Kabbalah) Today, the Jewish writings known as the “Cabala” consists of some 550 books. (It is important that you do not confuse the Cabala with the Talmud. The Talmud is another set of Jewish writings, consisting of some 650 books, which is a compilation of rabbinical interpretations of the Torah. Jesus strongly rejected the Talmud.) Matthew 23

It is sad that the majority of Christian pastors have never heard of the Cabala. I can personally testify to this fact, having attended a Southern Baptist Seminary where I received a Master’s Degree of Divinity. I never once heard any teaching or material disclosing the existence of the Cabala. Thus, the people in the Christian churches will never know, since pastors cannot teach something of which they have no knowledge.

Here is a very short synopsis of what the Cabala teaches:
At the time of creation, the god of creation became confused and depressed, and withdrew himself into himself. The part of him that makes up the “messiah essence” fell from heaven into the bottomless pit, where it took the form of ‘THE HOLY SERPENT.” Another part of him, which is the female part, called “Sophia,” is in charge of wisdom.

When Moses went up on the mountain to meet God, the Cabala states that in reality Moses met “the evil part of God” while the 70 elders at the foot of the mountain met the “good part of God.” This, they say, is how they received the beginning of the Cabala. They teach that the Holy Serpent is held captive in the bottomless abyss, and there are two ways to bring him out and up to the earth. (1) To make all people on the earth good. (2) To make all people on the earth totally evil.

The Cabalistic leadership under Solomon decided that it was easier to make people evil than good, so they chose what they call “the low road.” If they can pervert all people on the earth and make them sin and break every commandment that is found in the five books of Moses, that will open the legal road for the Holy Serpent to escape out of the bottomless pit and arrive as the messiah on earth in the form of “THE HOLY SERPENT.”

However, the only people this messiah is going to save will be Jewish, since all other people do not have a soul, but are animals (beasts). The more a Cabalistic Jew can sin and lead others into sin, the “GREATER HE IS SERVING GOD.”

CAN MY STATEMENTS ON THE CABALA BE VERIFIED?
Absolutely! First of all, at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem there is a full department dedicated to the study of the Cabala. For many years it was chaired by professor Gershom Scholem, who has written at least four textbooks on the Cabala, which have been translated into English and sold in Jewish outlets. They are listed in my bibliography at the end of this article. This Jewish scholar cannot be refuted in his work on the Cabala as he is looked upon by the Jewish people as the foremost expert of this subject.

Secondly, the Bible itself refutes the teachings of the Cabala. The prophet Isaiah (740-700 B.C.) is used by God to issue a strong rebuke to the teachers and followers of the Cabala, and you will find this in Isaiah, Chapter 4, verses 13-23. Here is another statement from God spoken by the prophet:

Wherefore hear the word of the Lord, you scornful men, that rule this people which is in Jerusalem. Because you have said, We have made a covenant with death, and with hell are we at agreement; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, it shall not come unto us: for we have made lies our refuge, and under falsehood have we hid ourselves: Therefore thus says the Lord God, I lay in Zion for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner stone, a sure foundation; he that believes shall not make haste.

Judgement also will I lay to the line, and righteousness to the plummet: and the hail shall sweep away the refuge of lies, and the waters shall overflow the hiding place. And your covenant with death shall be disannulled, and your agreement with hell shall not stand; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, then you shall be trodden down by it. Isaiah 28:14-18

The prophet Jeremiah, who began preaching in 627 B.C. was told by God that there is a conspiracy found among the men in Jerusalem (Jeremiah 11:9-10). The same word from God was given to the prophet Ezekiel who was a contemporary of Jeremiah. In Ezekiel 22:23-29, God speaks out clearly against the conspiracy of the Cabala among the Jewish people. The apostle Paul defends himself when he is accused of teaching the Cabala (Romans 3:8)

The strongest denunciation comes from the risen Christ himself, when he makes the following statements:

I know your works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but you are rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are of the synagogue of Satan. Revelation 2:9

Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before your feet, and to know that I have loved you. Revelation 3:9

I did not understand these Bible references that I have shared with you were not understood by me while in seminary. It was years later, when I learned about the Cabala, that I understood them. Unless you know what the Cabala teaches, these verses will make no sense to you.

THE FORMATION OF A WORLD GOVERNMENT
In previous articles of The Dove, I have documented how the Jewish Cabalistic leaders were able to establish a control over all world banking through the Rothschild family, and how the political power was captured through the work of Adam Weishaupt. Here is how it was done: Meyer Amschel (a rabbinically trained German Jew who later took the name Rothschild) was firmly established in the German city, Frankfurt am Main, with an emerging banking house as early as 1764. The leader of the Cabala at that time, Jakob Frank (a Polish born Jew with the family name of Leibowicz) lived in the German city of Offenbach (just south of the city of Frankfurt) from 1773. Johann Adam Weishaupt (from a Jewish family that had converted to the Roman Catholic Church) was at Ingolstadt in 1770, a German city in Bavaria. With these three men, the stage was set to ignite a hell fire that would forever bring changes to the world.

At this point in time, it is not known who “supervised” these three Jewish men, but it is obvious that someone directed their efforts. On May 1, 1776, just two months before the declaration of Independence in America, the Order of Illuminati was founded by Weishaupt. At this time Weishaupt was 28 years old, Amschel was 32 years old and Frank was 50 years old. Meyer Amschel financed Adam Weishaupt and Jakob Frank laid the cabalisic theological foundation for the Order of the Illuminati.

In order for the reader to understand that events do not just happen, I want to share the following information: The Illuminati Order was not invented by Adam Weishaupt, but rather renewed and reformed. The first known Illuminati order (Alumbrado) was founded in 1492 by Spanish Jews, called “Marranos,” who were also known as “crypto-Jews.” With violent persecution in Spain and Portugal beginning in 1391, hundreds of thousands of Jews had been forced to convert to the faith of the Roman Catholic Church. Publicly they were now Roman Catholics, but secretly they practiced Judaism, including following the Talmud and the Cabala. The Marranos were able to teach their children secretly about Judaism, but in particular the Talmud and the Cabala, and this huge group of Jews has survived to this very day. After 1540 many Marranos opted to flee to England, Holland, France, the Ottoman empire (Turkey), Brazil and other places in South and Central America. The Marranos kept strong family ties and they became very wealthy and influential in the nations where they lived. But as is the custom with all Jewish people, it did not matter in what nation they lived, their loyalty was to themselves and Judaism.

 

The following information is going to be a “shock” to all Roman Catholics. In 1491 San Ignacio De Loyola was born in the Basque province of Guipuzcoa, Spain. His parents were Marranos and at the time of his birth the family was very wealthy. As a young man he became a member of the Jewish Illuminati Order in Spain. As a cover for his crypto Jewish activities, he became very active as a Roman Catholic. On May 20, 1521 Ignatius (as he was now called) was wounded in a battle, and became a semi-cripple. Unable to succeed in the military and political arena, he started a quest for holiness and eventually ended up in Paris where he studied for the priesthood. In 1539 he had moved to Rome where he founded the “Jesuit Order,” which was to become the most vile, bloody and persecuting order in the Roman Catholic Church. In 1540, the current Pope Paul III approved the order. At Loyola’s death in 1556 there were more than 1000 members in the Jesuit order, located in a number of nations.

 

Setting up the Jesuit order, Ignatius Loyola devised an elaborate spy system, so that no one in the order was safe. If there was any opposition, death would come swiftly. The Jesuit order not only became a destructive arm of the Roman Catholic Church; it also developed into a secret intelligence service. While the Popes relied more and more on the Jesuits, they were unaware that the hardcore leadership were Jewish, and that these Jews held membership in the Illuminati Order which despised and hated the Roman Catholic Church.

 

In 1623 Marranos formed an order in France called “Guerients,” which in 1722 was changed to an Illuminati Order.

 

HOW SATAN MOVED IN THE CENTURIES
A baby boy was born on February 6, 1748, in Ingolstadt, a city in the German state of Bavaria, 192 years after the death of Ignatius Loyola. His parents were crypto Jews. The name of the boy was Joseph Johann Adam Weishaupt. The Father of Adam held a position of professor at the city university. Adam was educated in the Jesuit Order where he was exposed to the Jesuit organization and its political agenda. Here is a young Jew, who from early childhood learned that he had a secret allegiance to the Talmud and the Cabala, but outwardly he was a dedicated Roman Catholic.

 

In 1773, the 25 year old Adam broke all ties with the Jesuit Order and three years later formed the Bavarian Illuminati Order. In 1773, Pope Clemens XIV dissolved the Jesuit order, but 41 years later, in 1814 under Pope Pius VII, the Jesuit Order was reinstated, becoming the most powerful institution, next to the Knights of Malta, in the Roman Catholic Church. (This incident alone should forever destroy the doctrinal lie that a Pope is infallible and that a papal edict can never be changed).

 

The name of the new order Adam founded was “Orden Der Perfektibilisten.” Around 1779 the name was changed to “Orden Der Illuminaten,” and its members would bring hell and destruction to the world, the death of millions, the destruction of nations and the formation of the coming “New World Order.”

 

COPYING THE JESUIT ORDER
It is hard for a born again Christian to understand how evil operates. A truly born again Christian does not have a “Criminal Mind Set .” The Jesuit Order is not just bad, IT IS A VERY EVIL ORGANIZATION, hidden from the public. Its first publicly known terror project took place in South America in 1609, when the Jesuits created a slave state in what is now known as Paraguay. For 158 years the Jesuit Order ran a brutal slave encampment of more that 150,000 Guarani Indians who were divided into 30 concentration camps, called “reducciones.” Indians were lured to the settlements where they were received with festivities, music and plenty of food. Once the free Indians had entered the area to be entertained by these friendly Jesuits, the trap was sprung and they were overpowered by soldiers. They were then chained and taken to the camps, where they lost all freedom and had to work for no pay to produce for the Jesuit order. In 1767 enough information had filtered back to Europe to cause a political backlash. The Spanish king, Carl III, issued a decree and drove the Jesuits out of all Spanish colonies. The brutal murders, the rape of the women and the terrible working conditions were part of the daily routine in these concentration camps. If the reader has any doubts that this really took place, he should first do some research and then come to an intelligent conclusion.

 

THE CRADLE OF COMING HOLOCAUSTS
A huge area had been fenced in, similar to the Iron curtain in the 20th century. Jesuit priests (many of them crypto Jews) from Italy, England and Germany made up the camp leadership. The system was called “encomienda,” which means task or protection. The Jesuits used soldiers from Europe to make sure that the Indians were held in subjection. Once Indians had been subjected to the rule of the Jesuits, and their will power was broken, they were forced to form “councils,” which were used to make sure that the rank and file Indians carried out the slave work. The Jesuits would pick out certain Indians, who were given the role of supervising their own people. By giving these Indians some privileges, they became brutal oppressors in order to keep their own status. Both men and woman had to work in the slave camps. They were not allowed to own any property. The Jesuits enforced a work quota, if an Indian did not meet his quota, he received less food and clothing. The entire camp system was totally centralized. Punishment was swift and without mercy. If an Indian was going to be executed, he first had to kiss the hand of the executioner, thank him for the punishment and repent of his crime. Then the Indian was killed in front of the masses of people. Specialized Jesuit priests were used to politically and religiously indoctrinate the Indians and to forever break their ability to think for themselves. The result was that after one or two generations the Indians born in the slave camp accepted their lives as normal and were willing to die for their slave leaders. In the Communist countries they are called “politruks.”

 

It is clear that the model built by the Jesuits in Paraguay was used by Lenin when he set up the “Gulag system” in the Soviet Union, and by Hitler when he built the concentration camps in Germany. It is currently (1998) in use in China, North Korea and some day it will be used by the kingdom of the Antichrist.

 

The blame will forever be laid to Adam Weishaupt and his followers, who were responsible for the French Revolution, the American Civil War, World War I, the Russian Revolution, the rise of Adolf Hitler to power in Germany, World War II, the Communist takeover of China and many other nations after World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War and the list goes on and on.

 

It is noteworthy that the Jesuit Order is busy in all areas where the Roman Catholic church is operating, and that they have developed an elaborate educational system. Most people who have attended Jesuit schools do not know the dark secrets of the Order, since they are today forced to operate on a more benign scale. But that the Jesuits have not changed can be seen in the atrocities they had a part in during World War II, in what was then known as Yugoslavia. When the time for the rise of the Antichrist comes, expect to see the Jesuits with their leader, “the Black Pope,” take control of the people and set up camps once again.

 

HOW THE ILLUMINATI GAINED ITS POWER
Centuries earlier, the foundation for a World Government organization had been laid when Free Masonic lodges were formed in Europe, Russia and in the North American colonies. With these in place, Weishaupt moved very swiftly, and in 1775 Adam Weishaupt (now a professor of law) became a member in the Theodore Lodge in Munich, which was part of the Ekletical Masonry.

 

The Illuminati Order is organized very similarly to the Jesuit Order, since Weishaupt was educated by the Jesuits and was 20 years old in 1768 when the slave camps in Paraguay were closed. The Jesuits have four degrees, the Illuminati has three. The lowest degree consists of initiates, which are classified as the least illuminated. The second degree is made for Freemasons, including the Scottish Knights. The third degree is called “the degree of Mystery” and is reserved for priests, royal rulers and magicians. The supreme ruler in the Jesuit Order is called “General,” in the Illuminati he is called “King.” Adam Weishaupt became the first Illuminati king. In conjunction with these degrees, Weishaupt also founded a secret service which had members infiltrated into all degrees. They were called “Stealth Brothers,” and their job was to inform if there was any disloyalty. They used blackmail, provocation and terror. All members of the Illuminati Order had sworn a death oath to eternal silence, total loyalty and subjection to the Order. Any member who would betray the Order was promised a swift death. The Order does not joke; many have been murdered trying to leave the Order and expose it.


 

Back to 1999 Newsletters

 

Any scripture references are taken from the King James Bible.
Copyright © 1999 – European American Evangelistic Crusades (EAEC), Inc.
P.O. Box 41001, Sacramento, California 95841 USA

 

This data file/publication is the sole property of European American Evangelistic Crusades (EAEC), Inc. This data file/publication may not be used without the permission of EAEC for release or the enhancement of any other product sold; this includes all of its content with the exception of a few brief quotations. It may be reproduced only in its entirety for circulation as “freeware,” without charge.

 

Permission is granted for printing or copying in its entirety this data file/publication for the reader’s personal use or to pass on to family and friends. Permission is also granted to post this data file/publication in its entirety on a website, web page or ftp site as long as it is not altered or edited in any way, and all reproductions of this data file/publication MUST contain this copyright notice:

 

Copyright © 1999 – European American Evangelistic Crusades, Inc.
P.O. Box 41001, Sacramento, California 95841 USA
http://www.eaec.org

 

There is an epic “Story Behind the Story” concerning Penn State University and the firing of PSU President Graham Spanier and of course “legendary” football coach Joe Paterno last week.

Let’s review what has been ALLOWED to be released by the heavily censored, Jewish-dominated Main Stream Media concerning this.   America has been told, (and most Americans believe) that Spanier and Paterno were fired solely because they failed to fully report to law enforcement an incident of homosexual  pedophilia allegedly performed by assistant Penn State coach Sandusky that reportedly was witnessed by another assistant coach in the Penn State football training facility shower months ago.   Oh really?  Are you actually naive enough to believe that is all that has happened in “Happy Valley”?

Friends, don’t get me wrong!  I am not downplaying the perversity nor the criminal severity of that single WITNESSED event – but think about it.  In an age of widespread PROTECTED sexual perversion and promiscuity – where pedophilia between men and young boys is not only organized but is often promoted as wholesome activity (see http://nambla.org/)  and is publicly sanctioned and even protected by such perversely  powerful individuals as Congressman Barney Frank, do you really think a non-reported Man-Boy “Love Act” in a public shower on the campus of a liberal eastern University would be the sole driving force behind the firing of Spanier and Paterno?  No indeed, this story is much more shockingly sordid.  In reality, it involves MURDER, and a massive conspiratorial coverup of SILENCE – not just a “failure to report.”

First of all, it must be remembered that coach Joseph Vincent Paterno is Roman Catholic and Penn State Football is sacrosanct and omnipotent at University Park.  Just like Cardinal Law and the pedophile priests in Boston, Paterno apparently figured the best thing to do was just simply ignore the allegation in order to protect the sacred institution (not to mention his million-dollar salary); – hey it seemed to work for his beloved Catholic church, right?

Powerful people tend to think they are above the law – especially when they have the emotional support of an INFALLIBLE AND POWERFUL RELIGION behind them.     This truth was hammered home by Pennsylvania governor Tom Corbett who told the press that in his career, particularly when he was attorney general that he has: “seen many instances where people who have power believe that they’re beyond the law.”  Indeed.

No, I submit there is much, much more to this sordid tale, and I submit it is not just limited to the campus of Penn State University.

You see, the firings came after a very detailed STATE INVESTIGATION was conducted.  Sandusky is facing at least 40 counts of criminal sex abuse.  More victims are still coming forward – and the Story Behind the Story may or may not spread beyond the walls of Penn State University.

Victims are alleging that more than just pedophile acts between a coach and a 10-year-old boy occurred privately at Beaver Stadium.   It is quietly being alleged that wealthy and powerful PENN STATE ATHLETIC BOOSTERS were supplied with under-age children for perverse and highly illegal sex acts in exchange for larger monetary and/or political considerations.

I fully believe this to be true.  Why?  To begin with, Sandusky is facing more than 40 counts.  At least one such activity occurred in a public shower.   Think about the mentality of this.  A pedophile must have a very confident and fearless mindset to risk doing such a thing in such a public facility.   Furthermore, what happened at Happy Valley is EXACTLY what occurred at Catholic-Church’s Boy’s Town in Omaha, Nebraska.    The gruesome details are outlined by John DeCamp in the pages of his horrific non-fiction book entitled “THE FRANKLIN COVERUP: Child Abuse, Satanism, and Murder in Nebraska.”    (Isn’t it sort of “poetic justice” perhaps that NEBRASKA plays Penn State directly after the firings of Paterno and Spanier?)

In a nutshell, the FRANKLIN COVERUP is the all-too-true story of a nationwide pedophile ring that pandered children to a cabal of the rich and powerful elite of America’s politicos. The ring’s pimps were a pair of political powerbrokers who had access to the highest levels of our government. Nebraska legislators nearly exposed the ring in 1990, but its unveiling clearly had the potential to produce seismic political aftershocks on not only a national, but a GLOBAL scale.  The Nebraska state legislators’ efforts resulted in rash of mysterious deaths and the overpowering corruption of federal and local law enforcement, including the FBI, Secret Service, and Justice Department, effecting an elaborate and comprehensive cover-up of the trafficking network.

The FRANKLIN SCANDAL   

Author Nick Bryant came to John DeCamp with the sole intent of “debunking the lies” of the Franklin Coverup, according to DeCamp’s testimony to me personally.  Instead, Bryant eventually published a fully corroborating book he named THE FRANKLIN SCANDAL.   As both Bryant and DeCamp detail in their pages, these elite “power brokers” have never been brought to justice for their crimes — and clearly the “network” is widespread and involves iconic “institutions” of “above-the-law” religionists.   Are these “institutions” (Roman Catholicism, Mormonism, Judaism primarily) truly “above the law” – even to the point of committing cold-blooded MURDER??   It would appear so!

Again, the similarities between the Nebraska scandal and Penn State’s are eerily  similar.   Consider that the Nebraska chief investigator Gary Caradori died suddenly and violently and all his collected evidence destroyed in a fiery plane crash.   Caradori was not alone – more than a dozen key witnesses and investigators linked to this sick scandal in Nebraska also died violently.

So it is with the Pennsylvania investigation into one Jerry Sandusky’s activities at University Park.   Allegations against Sandusky first surfaced way back in 1998, yet his “activities” continued unabated for 13 years.  WHY?

According to the NBC affiliate in Philadelphia, the investigating Centre County District Attorney named Ray Gricar “disappeared” in 2005, and foul play is still suspected.   Gricar did not immediately arrest and charge Sandusky because the victims were not believable, but rather because the victims had a much bigger complaint that Gricar needed to fully investigate.  For the full NBC story on this, go to:

http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/DA-Who-Never-Charged-Sandusky-Has-Been-Missing-Since-2005-133615093.html

and

http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/10/ex-penn-state-pedophile-coach-jerry-sandusky-may-have-sold-young-boys-to-rich-donors/

I want my readers to know and understand that for three full days in September, 2010 – I, along with Dane Phillips, John Scura, et. al.  personally met with and Videotaped both John DeCamp and retired FBI Bureau Chief Ted Gunderson;  there we confirmed the breadth and depth of this very deep and darkest of all national secrets.   One of the reasons why the “Coverup” and “Conspiracy of Silence” is so pervasive, according to Ted Gunderson’s testimony, is that the investigative road inevitably leads to the door of the most powerful JEWISH SYNAGOGUES, CATHOLIC DIOCESE, AND MORMON (LDS) TEMPLES.   You see, the scandal once again rearing its ugly head at Penn State is not just about child rape in a shower.  It is all about Ritual Murders and what the Rabbis call “BLOOD LIBEL”.

Sex with under-age boys in Happy Valley showers is just a symptom of a much more pervasive cancer plaguing this once-great nation.   At the very least, the firings of Paterno and company is very definitely a step in the right direction – and COLLEGE FOOTBALL must take its lumps.   Hopefully, the investigation will continue and the ENTIRE TRUTH disclosed!!!  If not, hypocrisy is the only word to describe what is happening.

Still not convinced?  Then take some time and watch this video below in its entirety.  Then ask yourself, WHAT GROUP HAS THE POWER OVER THE NETWORKS TO SO QUICKLY AND COMPLETELY CENSOR THIS INVESTIGATIVE REPORT – after it had been listed in the TV Guide?

It is my personal prayer that the Nittany Lions of AMERICA will prevail here.   You see, Penn State’s “mascot” is the American Lion – aka Mountain Lion, Puma, or Cougar – but is specifically named Nittany because the University Park Campus is located in the “Nittany Valley” near “Mount Nittany” – the high point of a local mountain range likewise called “Nittany”.    Nittany is a Pennsylvania Native American term simply meaning: “A Protective Barrier Against the Elements.”    If ever America needs a “protective barrier” a “lion of truth” against this dark and pervasive practice – it is now.

For a more complete and clearer copy of “Conspiracy of Silence” – go to:

http://www.archive.org/details/ConspiracyOfSilence1994-LongVersion-TheFranklinScandal-2010

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=866739408240639313

A Libyan Woman from Quebec Tells the Truth!

As you listen to this testimony, consider the following FACTS that the JEWISH-CONTROLLED MEDIA will never tell you.  These policies and philosophies are exactly what Gadaffi outlined in his “Green Book” – he practiced what he preached – and THE PEOPLE benefited immensely.  To download and read this book (VERY SIMILAR TO AMERICAN THOMAS PAINE’S “Common Sense”) click on:

http://911-truth.net/other-books/Muammar-Qaddafi-Green-Book-Eng.pdf

Consider America, with students saddled with student LOANS (their first debts), more and more people losing their HOMES, and not even able to afford rent.  Who is right and who is wrong?

Please understand that I am not talking about Government going into DEBT to Robber Baron Banksters to provide for its citizens, I am talking about Government PROTECTING THE NATURAL RESOURCES, and DEVELOPING THEM FOR THE PEOPLE TO PROFIT – not for the billionaire KHAZAR ROBBER BARONS!   That’s the difference in the systems.
1. There is (was) no electricity bill in Libya; electricity is (was) free for all its citizens.

2. There is (was) no interest on loans, banks in Libya are (were) state-owned and loans given to all its citizens at 0% interest by law.  (The NEW regime will change this immediately.)

3. Housing is considered a human right in Libya – Gaddafi vowed that his parents would not get a house until everyone in Libya had a home. Gaddafi’s father died while Gaddafi, his wife and his mother were still living in a tent.

4. All newlyweds in Libya receive (d) $60,000 Dinar (US$50,000) by the government to buy their first apartment so to help start up the family.

5. Education and medical treatments are free in Libya. Before Gaddafi only 25% of Libyans were literate. Today the figure is 83%.

6. Should Libyans want to take up farming careers, they would receive farming land, a farming house, equipments, seeds and livestock to kick-start their farms – all for free.  (This was supported by the single largest WATER DEVELOPMENT PROJECT in Africa and the Middle East.)

7. If Libyans cannot find the education or medical facilities they need in Libya, the government funds them to go abroad for it – not only free, but they also get US$2,300/month for accommodation and car allowance.

8. If a Libyan buys a new car from Libya, the government subsidized 50% of the price.

9. The price of petrol in Libya is only $0.14 per liter.  (The raw cost of refinement and distribution.  The PROFIT on oil belonged to the PEOPLE, not to Rothschild’s BP and Rockefeller’s Standard Oil.)

10. Libya has (had) no external debt TO ROTHSCHILD CENTRAL WORLD BANKERS and its reserves amount to $150 billion – now frozen globally.  The Transitional National Council, however, begins their “reign” billions of dollars in debt to Rothschild as payment for NATO’s bombs!)

11. If a Libyan is unable to get employment after graduation, the state would pay the average salary of the profession as if he or she is employed, until employment is found.  (Paid for via Libyan oil sales abroad – not by INDEBTEDNESS!)

12. A large portion of all Libyan oil sales abroad is credited directly to the bank accounts of all Libyan citizens.  The more Libyan oil is sold, the wealthier the citizenry becomes.  IMAGINE THAT!!!

13. A mother who gives birth to a child receives US$5,000 ;

14. 40 loaves of bread in Libya costs only $0.15 ;

15. 25% of Libyans have a University degree. 15% have advanced degrees;

16. Gaddafi carried out the world’s largest irrigation project, known as the Great Man-Made River project, to make water readily available throughout the desert country. The water is free of charge.

Prior to the international sanction placed on Gaddafi & Libya in the 1980s, the country was one of the richest in the world by GDP per capita – with a living standard higher than Japan. It was the richest in Africa before the revolution.  It was known as the “Switzerland of the Middle East.”

The living standard – GDP per capita is $11,314 for Libya. One cannot claim the Libyans are poor if they live better than many of the Western citizens. Gaddafi always looked after the average Libyan.

A country’s wealth used to depend on how much gold it had in the treasury, not how many dollars it traded. Libya also has 144 tons of gold. The UK, for example, has twice as much, but ten times the population.


“If Gaddafi had intent to try to re-price his oil or whatever else the country was selling on the global market and accepts something else as a currency or maybe launches a gold dinar currency. Any move such as that would certainly not be welcomed by the power elite today, who are responsible for controlling the world’s central banks,” says Anthony Wile, founder and chief editor of the Daily Bell.

17. Under Gaddafi’s oil-revenue-sharing program, each Libyan gets $500 (DOLLARS) dumped into his or her bank account, each and every month.

18. Women in Libya have (had) equal rights, not only as a philosophy, but also in practice.  Under the Shariah-law-based “Transitional National Council” – this will likely change quickly.

19. Libyans have (had) a direct participatory democracy based on People’s Conferences that puts other “democracies” to shame.

A Google search on these will give you answers or more questions. One thing is certain: the Libyans never knew the meaning of poverty under Gaddafi.

Regarding the so called terrorists: Libya is the only country in North Africa where terrorists do not exist. Fundamentalists have no voice whatsoever in Libya. Not a single terror-incident has been recorded in Libya during Gaddafi’s regime. (inamibia.co.na)

After reading this, I ask you:
Do you think it was a people’s revolution or another well-planned coup?
and
Was Gaddafi a tyrant or a hero of the Libyan people?

Jesse Ventura Vents

I really don’t know what to think of Mr. Ventura.   His “conspiracy theory” shows on TruTV are pretty popular, and seem to touch many fringe issues.  However, the heart of the matter – the biggest single “conspiracy” of all – the worldwide empire of the Khazar money machine bankster House of Rothschild is completely ignored.

Go figure.

It would seem that Ventura should understand who ultimately controls Homeland Security and thus the TSA.  He should understand Khazar Chertoff’s connections to the full-body scanning machines and the millions he has pocketed from their deployment.  He should understand that no citizen Goy can challenge the “system” in a Babylonian court.   Perhaps someday, he will understand who the “foreign and domestic enemy” truly is.