US. Constitution: Amendment I. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

The very essence  of the 1st Amendment is that Americans are free to publicly express their opinion.  This is called “Freedom of Speech”.   Hopefully, such opinions are based on fact rather than fiction, and are rooted in logic as opposed to paranoia and/or UNFOUNDED prejudice.   Conversely, any consciously seditious restriction of such expression typically is designed to further some form of despotic design.  Welcome to the discussion of Senate Bill `10 – aka the “Anti-Semitism Awareness Act of 2016”.

When a colleague told me about the dangerous language inherent in this bill, I honestly thought at first that he was joking.  If not joking, then surely he must be mistaken.  Imagine a bill designed specifically to fiscally penalize U.S. colleges, universities, and public schools if they allowed ANY public denigration or disapproval of the FOREIGN NATION called Israel to occur on their campuses.  Such a concept is the epitome of Orwellian control, I reasoned.  Surely he must be mistaken!

So, I pulled up the bill on my computer, and verified its language.  I discovered it had already passed the Senate on Dec. 1 – and that it was scheduled to be voted on in the H.R. on Friday, January 13.

For your edification, here is the pdf link to download S.10 yourself.

S.10 basically expands what is known as Title VI of the 1963 Civil Rights Act to specifically define “anti-Semitism” as “Racism”.    Schools found guilty by the Dept. of Education of violating Title Vi can lose their “accreditation” status – which in turn spells financial ruin for that specific institution of “learning”.   The question then is: ‘What exactly is the definition of anti-Semitism”??  S.10 then refers to a specific State Department document to give us the definition of what constitutes “anti-Semitism”,  The State Department Document referred to is specifically named “Contemporary Global Anti-Semitism — A Report Provided to the U.S. Congress”.   This is where the Hidden Hand that spawns the devilish tool called incrementalism is exposed.

Incrementalism is the process of destroying the moral strengths of any given society by getting that society to accept small bites of glaring falsehoods until the entire colossal, fundamental lie is eventually consumed and digested.  This immoral tool has been successfully used on “progressive” college campuses over the years – and now it is “politically correct” to allow “diversity” in sexual orientations and “experimentation”.  In the words of arch-Satanist Aleister Crowley: ‘Do as Thou Wilt is the Whole of the Law.”    Now, according to Senate Bill 10 – it is “anti-Semitism” to publicly citizen the foreign nation of Israel.  Doing so can result in financial penalties and sanctions.   The next step will be to enact criminal penalties in the private sector for such “crimes of hate”.

Download the defining “report” here:

Some notable quotes from this “State Department” document:

Anti-Semitism is officially defined as (among other things):

Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as a collective—such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.

Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g., gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust)

Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.

Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.

On page 28 we read:

“Perhaps the oldest-surviving anti-Semitic conspiracy theory is that of “blood libel,” or the allegation that Jews perform murders to gather blood for religious purposes. According to this myth, Jews needed Christian blood for the production of matzoh (un- leavened bread consumed during the Jewish holi- day of Passover)”.

So – my question is simply this:  Can a Jewish person be accused of being an Anti-Semite, if that specific Jew honestly study the facts and come to an honest conclusion that such things are completely true?   Fact: Professor Ariall Toaff, an Israeli, published an intellectually honest book on this “conspiracy theory – myth” of blood libel and ritual sacrifice – and he documented that it was indeed not only true – but was a VALID EXPLANATION for WHY so many Jewish people have been expelled from so many nations over the years.  Funny how the State Department document conveniently ignored Toaff’s work.  See the pdf file of his book (which was confiscated and destroyed by Israeli government censors” here:

Is it anti-semitism to show the highly disproportionate number of organized crime (mafia) figures are actually Jewish?  Is it anti-semitism to document that the billion-dollar pornography industry is dominated by Jews?  Is it anti-semitism to document that the Federal Reserve fiscal policies that rule America’s banks are dictated by Jewish individuals?  Is it anti-semitism to document that all major news media outlets in America are controlled by Jews?  Is it anti-semitism to point out that the movie moguls and television execs that shape and mold public opinion and “norms” are primarily Jewish?  Is it anti-semitism to document that the LGBT agenda is financed and promoted by Jews?  Finally, is it anti-semitism to document that many of the German “high command” under Hitler were not only “full blood Jews” but many received the highest military honors personally from “Der Fueher” himself?”   See

It seems to me that the proverbial playground bully not only is pilfering lunch money from all the kids in the school in the guise of “protection” – but has the teachers, the school principals, and even the Department of Education, as well as the parents muzzled via financial and social blackmail to simply look the other way and allow the bullying to not only continue his abhorrent behavior – but to accelerate in in activity and scope!    Enough is enough!