Years ago I had a troubling debate with a colleague who was employed as a “theoretical physicist” at UCLA.   He was counseling me that I would never be “taken seriously” in the scientific brotherhood unless and until I abandoned any belief in the Holy Bible.   One of his issues was the Genesis account wherein we read that God, the Creator, actually created light BEFORE He created the sun, the apparent source of all visible light spectrum in the known universe.

My great-uncle John Ott did a lot of ground-breaking work studying the very nature of light.  He called it “Exploring the Spectrum”.  He documented how the seven visible colors of the spectrum – red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo and violet each has measurable vibrational signatures.  Indeed, it is now pretty much agreed among physicists that light can best be defined as: “A combination of both an electric and a magnetic field, oscillating together”.

Physicist also now maintain that a changing (or oscillating) electric field actually creates a magnetic field, while a changing magnetic field creates an electric field. The two fields oscillate in step, the fields “reinforcing” each other, as the light propagates through space. It would not be correct to say that the magnetic field “has a frequency;” it would be more correct to say that oscillations of the field have a frequency. Light is one such oscillation of the fields, and those oscillations can be made at many different frequencies.  This gives us the different colors of the spectrum of light.


What is amazing is that there are now machines that can actually take literal pictures of the magnetic patterns called the TORUS of a magnetic field.  If all LIGHT is nothing more than an electrically charged magnetic field, then what exactly is the SUN itself?   Could it be possible that the writer of Genesis had it right all along?  Did God create LIGHT BEFORE CREATING THE SUN?  Indeed, it does appear that is exactly correct.

Look closely at the events documented in Genesis Chapter 1. The first step of all started with this primal act: the “Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters”.  Notice waters is plural, not singular “water”.

3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. 4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness. 5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.  Again, notice this was done BEFORE the sun and the moon were created and placed in the firmament.

6 ¶ And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. 7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. 8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.

Think about the next step in the creation account.  God created the dry land and separated it from the “waters” below the firmament of heaven.  Again, this was BEFORE the sun was created, He caused the land to grow grasses and other plants.  So is “photosynthesis” of plants truly dependent upon the SUN to create energy for the plants?

9 ¶ And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so. 10 And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good. 11 And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so. 12 And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good. 13 And the evening and the morning were the third day.

So, why exactly did God create the “greater light” of the Sun to “rule (or measure) the day” and the “lesser light” of the moon to rule (or measure) the night?  Was it to give life-giving “light” to the earth, or was it specifically done to measure “time”?  Remember, God had already created “light”.

14 ¶ And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years: 15 And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so. 16 And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also. 17 And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth, 18 And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good. 19 And the evening and the morning were the fourth day.

What this clearly tells us is that God made light first, then set the sun, moon and stars to ALSO be a source of this light to the earth plane he created.  But PRIMARILY the sun, moon and stars are the veritable clockwork of creation – and precisely measures days, months, years and the equinox SEASONS.  This is exactly correct.

This, to me, is the PRIMARY PROBLEM of why the so-called “heliocentric model” cannot be meshed with the Genesis.  One has to be true, and one has to be false.  Is the sun really a gigantic mass of gas 96 million miles away from earth?  Is the earth’s ROTATION and yearly orbit around the sun what actually calculates days, months, and years – and not the moving sun and moon?  That is why only one account can be true.  They both cannot be truth.  Genesis 1 is clearly not a figurative metaphor, for it is the very structural foundation of the entire Bible.

The world is awakening to truth.  Using LOGIC and SOUND SCIENCE, we can now begin to unveil the satanic lies and delusion that is Heliocentrism.    We can now show the geocentric Bible account is indeed true.  We can do it by understanding the principles of “level” water, as well as studying the TRUTH about the sun – that it may well indeed be a totally MAGNETIC creation of light and that it is indeed in motion above the earth and NOT 96 million miles away.


So, considering the Holy Bible to be true and literal, and thus there is an electromagnetic “firmament” structure above our earth plane, then could “Quantum Levitation” give us a strong clue as to exactly how the sun and the moon, electromagnetic discs of energy, could be following their “circuits” in the firmament?