Tag Archive: libya


It’s official, as of this morning, January 20, 2017, Donald J. Trump is the 45th POTUS.    In watching the various “mainstream media” coverages of the event this morning, FOX interviewed a number of random people asking them to “give a message to the President”.  The vast majority were simply trite phrases such as “I’m praying for you” etc. – just basically giving him congratulations.   I thought, watching this, how much I would like to sit with him for just an hour, just as a concerned citizen, and share with him the following information concerning the machinations of the country called Israel, which he so clearly champions and promotes, and that of one “good friend” Benjamin Netanyahu.   It is my guess that he would more than likely dismiss it all as “hate speech” and “anti-semitism” – but at least he would have been warned. Then again, Donald J. Trump is a smart and savvy international businessman.   He very likely knows all that what I “expose” here is absolutely true and factual – but will simply ignore it in favor of keeping his personal financial empire, built via partnership with the same criminal elements, fully intact and growing ever larger.

Here then are a number of hard-core, indisputable facts I would like to present to President Trump.  If he want’s to truly “Make America Great Again” – then I submit he should immediately bring America’s enemies to full accountability!!!

Fact 1:  The Israeli newspaper Ma’ariv reported that Likud leader and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told an audience at Bar Ilan university that the September 11, 2001 terror attacks had been beneficial for Israel.
“We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq,” Ma’ariv quoted the former prime minister as saying. He reportedly added that these events “swung American public opinion in our favor.”
read more: http://www.haaretz.com/news/report-netanyahu-says-9-11-terror-attacks-good-for-israel-1.244044

Fact 2:  According to Bush’s own Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, as much as $2.3 TRILLION Dollars “could not be accounted for” in a recent audit.   During the time of this massive GAO audit, the “comptroller” of the Pentagon was a dual-Israeli/U.S. citizen and ordained Talmudic Rabbi named Dov Zakheim.  Zakheim was also a member of PNAC  (Project for a New American Century) which openly stated in their infamous document (dated September 2000): “Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor.” Furthermore, he was also an executive at a defense contractor System Planning Corporation (SPC),  specializing in remote controlled airplane/commercial jet systems, a subsidiary of which investigated the 93′ WTC bombing.  Following the events of 9/11 Zakheim then went to work for military contractor Booz Allen.

SPC subsidiary Tridata Corp investigated the ’93 bombing, and so Zackheim had access to the WTC blueprints.

http://www.whale.to/b/dov_zakheim5.html

Above link has biographical info on Rabbi Z and his stunning connections to Mossad and even worse, the criminal organization called Irgun.    As comptroller of the Pentagon, Zakheim had the ability and the authority to siphon off large sums of money and/or material and keep the paper trail well hidden.  Did he steal $2.3 Trillion for Israel?  No, of course not.  But it is VERY LIKELY that he was able to “cook the books” to keep auditors from tracing untold BILLIONS that may well have found their way into Israeli/Mossad hands.  I find it highly suspicious that the very area of the Pentagon that was destroyed on Sept. 11 just happened to be where the auditors were doing their investigations.  The bottom line is all HARD EVIDENCE of the “unaccounted for” trillions is now permanently destroyed.   We shall never know exactly what went where.  Remember the three primary elements needed to prove guilt in any criminal indictment?  Motive, Means, and Opportunity.   Rabbi Zakheim, working for his beloved Israel, fulfills all three elements – IN SPADES.   Why then, has he not been indicted?

Fact 3:  Russian President Vlad Putin declared recently during an international Press Conference that the rebels engaged in civil war in Syria are “highly paid mercenaries” who are primarily funded through intermediaries operating out of Libya and Iraq (aka ISIL or ISIS aka Al-Quaeda).   Follow the money trail.  Zakheim’s Mossad agents receive the embezzled Pentagon billions which are then used to fund mercenary “Revolutionaries” (as detailed in PNAC Report) to initiate “regime changes” in Arab countries historically hostile to Israel – even though these countries had absolutely NOTHING to do with September 11.  Regime change dominoes fall in this order:  1. Iraq 2. Egypt 3. Libya 4. Syria.  No wonder Netanyahu declared that Israel benefitted from 9-11 –  indeed the “New Pearl Harbor” started the dominoes of “regime changes” falling – just as the PNAC called for.   Public opinion was effectively swayed to reflect:  Arabs = Evil while Israelis = Fellow Terror Victims!

Keep in mind that any “revolution”, unless it is 100% peaceful and bloodless, needs large amounts of MONEY and MATERIAL to operate and effect “regime change”.  Mr. Trump, the real-live “Gordon Gecko” of Wall Street knows how to read a balance sheet.  He knows how to follow the money.  So – where did the rebel factions get their funding in Egypt, in Libya, and now in Syria?  According to ABC News, Saddam Hussein withdrew over ONE BILLION US FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES in 100 dollar bills from the Iraqi “central” bank – just before he was attacked by the American Military.  How exactly did the Iraqi bank get that many FED RESERVE notes when there was supposed to have been sanctions against Hussein and Iraq because of non-existent “weapons of mass destruction”.   After the successful, quick invasion of Iraq, whatever happened to those funds which supposedly were captured?  That’s an ongoing mystery to this very day.  See http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/Investigation/story?id=129291&page=1

Fact 4.   Libya’s leader Muammar Qadafi was able to successfully raise the standard of living of the Libyan people to shocking heights.   After taking power in 1969, FOLLOWING A PEACEFUL, BLOODLESS COUP, this supposed “Mad Dog of the Middle East” (as Ronald Reagan called him), raised the Libyan literacy rate from an abysmal 22% to over 80% in less than three decades.  Hospitals and schools were built.  Housing was improved.  Libya was tagged the “Switzerland of the Middle East” by many Western visitors. How many ruthless “dictators” accomplished this type of change in their countries?

Hollywood Movie Star? Nope - Moammar Qadafi in the early 70's

Hollywood Movie Star? Nope – Moammar Qadafi in the early 70’s

Qadafi had an over-riding philosophy that some would call “socialist”.   He firmly believed that all national assets located within sovereign borders belonged exclusively to “the People” of that country – and not to private multinational corporations.   Thus, he “liberated” the Libyan oilfields from the private oil companies in 1969, and placed all national Libyan revenues and assets in “trust” for the people of Libya.  He adamantly refused to allow private central bankers to control the nation’s wealth.  He successfully established a 100% gold and silver backed national currency called the Dinar.   In short, he did EXACTLY what past American HEROES such as Andrew Jackson and Thomas Jefferson did.  He formed and defended a PURE REPUBLIC, “of the People, by the People, and FOR THE PEOPLE”.    All the time, his only “excesses” was owning and driving a green VW beetle personal car and living with his wife and children in a modest dwelling instead of a “palace” unlike the “House of Saud”.

Following the lifting of international economic “sanctions”, “THE LEADER” began spending untold millions of Libya oil dollars on a vast water project designed to turn Libya into an agricultural Eden that clearly had the potential to feed all of Africa – and end the famines and poverty so prevalent on that continent.  This incredibly humane project was just beginning to come to full fruition in the summer of 2011 when NATO bombs supposedly aiding the poor “rebels” targeted this incredible infrastructure and effectively destroyed a decade of work.  Again, how many “ruthless dictators” engage in such a large humanitarian undertaking?

0302_rb_libya_oil

Yes, Qadafi made some mistakes, but I submit they were honest mistakes.  He was NOT a career politician.  Imagine, an honest Dinar currency being circulated throughout all of North Africa instead of the U.S. Federal Reserve Note?  Imagine what would happen if all Arab nations took his lead and demanded oil payments in Dinars instead of fiat Dollars? This was the primary mistake that led to his downfall.   His inspiration was to simply unite all Arabian countries, not for personal manipulation nor power, but with an apparently honest desire to help his people, and his country achieve greater heights.   In a sincere interview just a year before his violent death at the hands of paid Mossad Mercenaries, he was asked what words he would like to see carved on his tombstone.  His answer was genuine and humble: “He Served the People”.   Surely this man deserved better than to be killed by paid foreign mercenaries in the way that he was.

In a documentary on Qadafi’s enigmatic life competed years before his death – consider that his mentor and hero was then Egyptian President Nasser.   In a biography titled “Nasser – The Last Arab” we learn that Nasser’s favorite movie was Frank Capra’s classic: ‘It’s a Wonderful Life” and that he watched it constantly, not just at Christmas.  We also learn that Nasser was assassinated by CIA/MOSSAD operatives in 1970 via what was labeled “Operation Sipony”.   Nasser,you see, was slipped a lethal dose of sodium morphate – causing a sudden and deadly heart attack.   Anwar Sadat, who replaced Nasser, was little more than a shill and toady for Israel.  No more “Six Day Wars” and thus no more need for Israeli jets to attack USS Liberty type vessels and to foment nuclear war.  Yes, it was definitely in America’s interest to assassinate Nasser.

The  lesson the honest-in-heart MUST learn from what happened in Libya is the role that the nation of Israel and the MOSSAD played in manipulating public opinion and the eventual destruction of a sovereign government that refused to yield to the Kosher Nostra – the hidden hand of Zionist world control.   If these godless miscreants can do this to Qadaffi and Libya, they can do it to any country.  The end result is suspension of the rule of law and chaos and fear is the ultimate result.

So, was Qaddafi responsible for the airline bombing at Lockerbie Scotland, and other “mad dog” terrorist acts, or was he a victim of multiple Mossad false flag operations designed to inflame international opinion against him?  According to allegations made by a former Mossad operative and whistleblower named Victor Ostrovsky, that’s exactly what Israel staged against Libya.   Remember the motto of the Mossad is chillingly: “By Means of Deception, Thou Shalt Wage War.”    In the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, October/November 1999 , pages 22-23, we find a very interesting report written by Richard H. Curtiss entitled simply: “The Israeli Deception that Led to the Bombing of Pan American Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland”.  Curtiss writes:

“Is Colonel Qaddafi, Libya’s principal leader ever since he led a successful military coup against the pro-Western monarchy there in 1969, a seemingly incurable troublemaker or have his actions and eccentricities been exaggerated deliberately by the Western media?

Surprisingly, the Israel lobby’s principal American think tank, the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, predicts “a fundamental reorientation of Libya’s foreign policy” in a study it released Aug. 16. It complains, however, that Qaddafi’s “antagonism toward Israel” has not “ameliorated.” This means that Israel’s backers in the U.S. media will continue an unrelenting campaign to keep alive the memory of his transgressions, real or imagined.

There is a sinister aspect to this campaign of which Americans should be aware in making judgments about where U.S.-Libyan relations should go from here. That is the fact that the current U.S.-Libyan problems were deliberately instigated by Israeli actions. Unfortunately, and this is the sinister part of it, the U.S. media observe a nearly total taboo in discussing this Israeli role, although the facts are indisputable.

For example who, besides the Libyans themselves, remembers that the first victims in the brutal and seemingly endless tit-for-tat acts of retaliation involving Libya and, later, the U.S. were the 111 passengers and crewmembers killed in the crash of a Libyan commercial airliner downed on Feb. 23, 1973 by Israeli guns as it descended, slightly off course during a dust storm, over Israeli-occupied Egyptian Sinai for a routine landing at Cairo International Airport?

The Israelis called it a case of mistaken identity. It is not clear whether U.S. journalists ever asked why the Israeli soldiers along the Suez Canal were firing ground-to-air missiles at a civilian airliner at all, regardless of its identity. Nor why the U.S. media obstinately refuse to recognize the role of this early outrage, only four years after Qaddafi came to power, and Western indifference toward it, in the shaping of his mindset about the West in general, and the U.S. in particular.

Whether the Israeli killing of such a large number of Libyan and Egyptian civilians was or was not accidental, the next documented Israeli intervention was a deliberate and successful attempt to instigate hostilities between Libya and the United States in February 1986. It led directly to the April 1986 U.S. bombing of Libya’s two major cities, Tripoli and Benghazi, in which there were some 40 Libyan casualties, including the death of Qaddafi’s infant adopted daughter. (She had been orphaned when her father, a former Syrian air attaché in Libya, was killed in aerial combat with Israel.) If, indeed, the two accused Libyans were responsible for the Lockerbie bombing, it clearly was direct retaliation for the U.S. attack.

The manner in which Israel’s Mossad tricked the U.S. into attacking Libya was described in detail by former Mossad case worker Victor Ostrovsky in The Other Side of Deception, the second of two revealing books he wrote after he left Israel’s foreign intelligence service. The story began in February 1986, when Israel sent a team of navy commandos in miniature submarines into Tripoli to land and install a “Trojan,” a six-foot-long communications device, in the top floor of a five-story apartment building. The device, only seven inches in diameter, was capable of receiving messages broadcast by Mossad’s LAP (LohAma Psicologit—psychological warfare or disinformation section) on one frequency and automatically relaying the broadcasts on a different frequency used by the Libyan government.

The commandos activated the Trojan and left it in the care of a lone Mossad agent in Tripoli who had leased the apartment and who had met them at the beach in a rented van.  “By the end of March, the Americans were already intercepting messages broadcast by the Trojan,” Ostrovsky writes.

“Using the Trojan, the Mossad tried to make it appear that a long series of terrorist orders were being transmitted to various Libyan embassies around the world,” Ostrovsky continues. As the Mossad had hoped, the transmissions were deciphered by the Americans and construed as ample proof that the Libyans were active sponsors of terrorism. What’s more, the Americans pointed out, Mossad reports confirmed it.”

“Operation Trojan was one of the Mossad’s greatest successes,” Ostrovsky writes. “It brought about the air strike on Libya that President Reagan had promised—a strike that had three important consequences. First, it derailed a deal for the release of the American hostages in Lebanon, thus preserving the Hezbollah as the number one enemy in the eyes of the West. Second, it sent a message to the entire Arab world, telling them exactly where the United States stood regarding the Arab-Israeli conflict. Third, it boosted the Mossad’s image of itself, since it was they who, by ingenious sleight of hand, had prodded the United States to do what was right… 

In conclusion, in light of Ostrovsky’s book and the clear parallels of the events of September 11, it needs to be emphasized that Qadaffi had accumulated over 143 metric tons of gold as well as the same tonnage of silver as backing for the Libyan Dinar currency.  Enter U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her private e-mails from Benghazi Libya.   She refuses to release some 50,000 pages of “classified” personal e-mails, while around 10% of the e-mails have been made public and can be read at WikiLeaks.  One e-mail from “Sid” (Blumenthal – her Jewish “confidant” and Clinton Foundation head) spills the beans as to what the criminal elite headed by Rothschild really desired in Libya.   Here is the e-mail dated April 2, 2011 as the “rebellion” was just recognized and backed by NATO (primarily  France):

For: Hillary

From: Sid

Re: France’s client & Qaddafi’s gold

1. A high ranking official on the National Libyan Council states that factions have developed within it. In part this reflects the cultivation by France in particular of clients among the rebels. General Abdelfateh Younis is the leading figure closest to the French, who are believed to have made payments of an unknown amount to him. Younis has told others on the NLC that the French have promised they will provide military trainers and arms. So far the men and materiel have not made an appearance. Instead, a few “risk assessment analysts” wielding clipboards have come and gone. Jabril, Jalil and others are impatient. It is understood that France has clear economic interests at stake. Sarkozy’s occasional emissary, the intellectual self-promoter Bernard Henri-Levy, is considered by those in the NLC who have dealt with him as a semi-useful, semi-joke figure.

2. Rumors swept the NLC upper.  echelon this week that Qaddafi may be dead or maybe not. 

3. Qaddafi has nearly bottomless financial resources to continue indefinitely, according to the latest report we have received:   On April 2, 2011 sources with access to advisors to Salt al-Islam Qaddafi stated in strictest confidence that while the freezing of Libya’s foreign bank accounts presents Muammar Qaddafi with serious challenges, his ability to equip and maintain his armed forces and intelligence services remains intact. According to sensitive information available to this these individuals, Qaddafi’s government holds 143 tons of gold, and a similar amount in silver. During late March, 2011 these stocks were moved to SABHA (south west in the direction of the Libyan border with Niger and Chad); taken from the vaults of the Libyan Central Bank in Tripoli.
This gold was accumulated prior to the current rebellion and was intended to be used to establish a pan-African currency based on the Libyan golden Dinar. This plan was designed to provide the Francophone African Countries with an alternative to the French.franc (CFA).
(Source Comment: According to knowledgeable individuals this quantity of gold and silver is valued at more than $7 billion. French intelligence officers discovered this plan shortly after the current rebellion began, and this was one of the factors that influenced President Nicolas Sarkozy’s decision to commit France to the attack on Libya. According to these individuals Sarkozy’s plans are driven by the following issues:


a. A desire to gain a greater share of Libya oil production,
b. Increase French influence in North Africa,
c. Improve his intemai political situation in France,
d. Provide the French military with an opportunity to reassert its position in the world,
e. Address the concern of his advisors over Qaddafi’s long term plans to supplant France as the dominant power in Francophone Africa)
On the afternoon of April 1, an individual with access to the National Libyan Council (NLC) stated in private that senior officials of the NLC believe that the rebel military forces are beginning to show signs of improved discipline and fighting spirit under some of the new military commanders, including Colonel Khalifha Haftar, the former commander of the antiQaddafi forces in the Libyan National Army (LNA). According to these sources, units defecting from Qaddafi’s force are also taking a greater role in the fighting on behalf of the rebels.

So – what happened to all of that gold and silver??   Could this be what is funding the Syrian mercenaries?   Keep in mind who owns the lion’s share of the world’s gold – the House of Rothschild located in the heart of the City of London financial district.  For many decades, the Rothschilds have “fixed” the spot price of gold worldwide.   The Rothschilds also control the purse strings of France as well.  They simply couldn’t allow oil and other commodities to be pegged on gold values.   It was THE biggest threat to their world monopoly since Napoleon!  All of this caused by a simple Bedouin GOY who came out of the desert with an idea and a good heart!!

 

 Comments on the video “AGENDA: Grinding America Down!”  vimeo.com/52009124

Do you not think God inspires GOOD MEN through the simple faith of Children?  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=P8rZJhr8W5M

Truly, it is not a “conspiracy” – it is the open, declared WORLDWIDE AGENDA of the “New World Order” envisioned by the  godless, United Nations.  It is in your face and as real as it can be!!!!   Above all this one most important TRUTH must be understood:   it is an all-out WAR TO THE DEATH against PURE  BIBLICAL CHRISTIANITY!!!!!!  When the U.N. finalizes its world-wide “Treaty” banning all “small arms” during the Ides of March (Jewish Purim celebration) – when the Jewish-Communist “Frankfurt School” Superman Barak Obama invokes the gun-banning U.N. Treaty under “authority” of Article 6 Sec. II of the U.S. Constitution;  effectively trumping the 2nd Amendment and any individual states rights, there WILL THEN BE OPEN REVOLUTION IN THE UNITED STATES – just as there was in 1860 America, just as there was/is in Libya, and just as there is today in Syria.   The stage is set, Dear Reader, and the actors of the script are hereby clearly identified.  

Are you adequately prepared,  for this, Dear Reader?  Is your Christian Pastor and Congregation even AWARE OF THE AGENDA?  Have they even heard of the “Frankfurt School”, the Fabians, and their devilish agenda of death??   Do they even care?  If not, I submit they are a part of the problem.     

“It was”, said Ralph de Toledano (1916-2007), the conservative author and co-founder of the National Review, “a meeting more harmful to Western civilization than the Bolshevik Revolution itself.”   


“We must organise the intellectuals and use them TO MAKE WESTERN CIVILIZATION STINK! Only then, after they have CORRUPTED ALL ITS VALUES AND MADE LIFE IMPOSSIBLE, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat.” (Emphasis added)

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      – Willi Munzenberg

Satan’s Secret Agents: the Frankfurt School and their Evil Agenda

Based on an original article (see here) by Timothy Matthews.
Abbreviated and adapted with additional material  by Lasha Darkmoon (LD) and A. True Ott (Ott).

The Frankfurt School Logos and Banner (Flag).

“GOD  IS  DEAD! . . . BEHOLD, I GIVE YOU THE SUPERMAN!”
— Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spake Zarathustra

Let’s begin by considering the corrosive work of the Frankfurt School: a group of German-American scholars, mostly Jewish, (actually ALL were Jewish – a few were crypto-Jew “Jesuits” —– Ott) who developed highly provocative and original perspectives on contemporary society and culture, drawing on Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, and Weber.

Their idea of a “cultural revolution” was not particularly new. Joseph, Comte de Maistre (1753-1821), who for fifteen years had been a Freemason, had this to say: “Until now, nations were killed by conquest, that is by invasion. But here an important question arises: can a nation not die on its own soil, without resettlement or invasion, by allowing the flies of decomposition to corrupt to the very core those original and constituent principles which make it what it is?”

What was the Frankfurt School?

Well, in the days following the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, it was believed that a Workers’ Revolution would sweep into Europe and, eventually, into the United States. It failed to do so. Towards the end of 1922, the Communist International (Comintern) began to consider the reasons for this failure.

On Lenin’s initiative, a meeting was organized at the Marx-Engels Institute in Moscow. The aim of the meeting was to throw light on the meaning of Marx’s Cultural Revolution. What did “cultural revolution” entail?  What was it all about?

First, among those present, was Georg Lukács, a Jewish Hungarian aristocrat and son of a banker. He had become a Communist during World War I. A good Marxist theoretician, he had developed the idea of “Revolution and Eros” — sexual instinct used as an instrument of destruction.

Then there was Willi Münzenberg, another revolutionary Jew whose proposed solution to the problems besetting society was to organize the intellectuals and use them to make Western civilization stink. Only then, after they have corrupted all its values and made life impossible, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat.”

“It was”, said Ralph de Toledano (1916-2007), the conservative author and co-founder of the National Review, “a meeting more harmful to Western civilization than the Bolshevik Revolution itself.”

Lenin died in 1924, but by that time Stalin had risen to power and was beginning to look on Willi Munzenberg, George Lukács and other Jewish revolutionaries (like Trotsky) as dangerous Marxist “revisionists”, introducing concepts into Marxism that were alien to Marxism and which served only a Jewish agenda.  (Actually, since Karl Marx and collectivism itself is a 100% Jewish “agenda” – Stalin’s “purge” was more about a personal vendetta and internal leadership “power struggle” than about protecting the “party”.  It amounts to the Jewish-American mob boss mowing down any potential competition to his power base. —- Ott)

In June 1940, on Stalin’s orders, Münzenberg was hunted down to the south of France by a NKVD assassination squad and hanged from a tree.

In the summer of 1924, after being attacked for his writings by the Fifth Comintern Congress, Lukács moved to Germany. Here he chaired the first meeting of a group of Communist oriented sociologists. This gathering was to lead to the foundation of the Frankfurt School.

This “School”, designed to put flesh on their revolutionary program, was started at the University of Frankfurt in the Institut für Sozialforschung. To begin with, school and institute were indistinguishable. In 1923, the Institute had been officially established, and funded by Felix Weil (1898-1975). Weil, born in Argentina into a wealthy  Jewish family, was sent to attend school in Germany at the age of nine. He attended the universities in Tübingen and Frankfurt, where he graduated with a doctoral degree in political science. While at these universities he became increasingly interested in socialism and Marxism.

Carl Grünberg, the Institute’s Jewish director from 1923-1929, was an avowed Marxist, although the Institute did not have any official party affiliations. But in 1930 Max Horkheimer (also Jewish) assumed control. He believed that Marx’s theory should be the basis of the Institute’s research.

When Hitler came to power, the Institute was closed and its members, by various routes, fled to the United States and ended up as academics at major US universities: Columbia, Princeton, Brandeis, and California at Berkeley.

LD:  The fact that they spoke very poor English was no disqualification. They were Jewish, and so they managed to obtain prestigious academic appointments through Jewish influence, i.e., through networking — a system that works exceptionally well even today and which accounts for the huge and unfair preponderance of Jews in academia.

The School included among its members the 1960s guru of the New Left Herbert Marcuse — denounced by Pope Paul VI for his theory of liberation which “opens the way for [sexual] licence cloaked as liberty” — Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, the popular writer Erich Fromm, Leo Lowenthal, and Jurgen Habermas. All these individuals except Habermas were of Jewish origin.

Basically, the Frankfurt School believed that as long as an individual had the belief — or even the hope of belief — that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to provoke a socialist revolution.

Their task, therefore, was as swiftly as possible to undermine the “Judaeo-Christian legacy.”

LD:  “Judeo-Christian” is an oxymoron, a contradiction in terms, given that Judaism and Christianity are at opposite ends of the religious spectrum. Since most Jews are  actively hostile to Christianity, and since Talmudic Jews actually take pleasure in the thought of Christ being boiled in excrement in hell, to speak of the “Judeo-Christian legacy” is clearly nonsensical.

To undermine Western civilization, the Frankfurt School Jews called for the most negative and destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life. To de-stabilize society and bring it to its knees, to engineer collapse, to produce crisis and catastrophe — this became the aim of these maladjusted and mentally sick Jewish revolutionaries masquerading as high-powered intellectuals.

Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a virus — “continuing the work of the Western Marxists by other means”, as one of their members noted.

To further the advance of their “quiet” cultural revolution, the Frankfurt School made the following twelve recommendations — all of them calculated to undermine the foundations of society and create the dystopia we now see all around us:

1.  The creation of racism offences and hate speech laws.
2.  Continual change to create confusion (e,g., in school curricula).
3.  Masturbation propaganda in schools, combined with the homosexualization of children and their corruption by exposing them to child porn in the classroom.
4.  The systematic undermining of parental and teachers’ authority.
5.  Huge immigration to destroy national identity and foment future race wars.
6.  The systematic promotion of excessive drinking and recreational drugs.
7.  The systematic promotion of sexual deviance in society.
8.  An unreliable legal system with bias against the victims of crime.
9.  Dependency on state benefits.
10. Control and dumbing down of media. (Six Jewish companies now control 96 percent of the world’s media. LD).
11.  Encouraging the breakdown of the family.
12.  All all-out attack on Christianity and the emptying of churches.

LD:  In the Soviet Union, under Stalin and his Communist Jews, the emptying of churches was accomplished by the simply expedient of burning the churches down—thousands of them—and building synagogues instead. See here.

Coincidentally, most of these same aims and objectives were set out prominently in the pages of that alleged  “forgery”, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. The Jewish philosophers of the Frankfurt School, it seems, had been heavily influenced by the Protocols. They were clearly impressed by what they read there and decided to implement its recommendations in their own sinister agenda.

One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s idea of “pansexualism”: the search for indiscriminate sexual pleasure, the promotion of “unisex”, the blurring of distinctions between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women, and, finally, the undermining of heterosexuality at the expense of homosexuality — as, for example, in the idea of “same-sex marriage” and the adoption of children by homosexual couples.

Willi Münzenberg summed up the Frankfurt School’s long-term operation thus: “We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks.”

WILLI  MUNZENBERG, JEWISH REVOLUTIONARY OF THE FRANKFURT SCHOOL

“We must organise the intellectuals and use them TO MAKE WESTERN CIVILIZATION STINK! Only then, after they have CORRUPTED ALL ITS VALUES AND MADE LIFE IMPOSSIBLE, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat.” (Emphasis added)

LD:  According to Sean McMeekin’s The Red Millionaire: A political biography of Willi Münzenberg, Münzenberg was “the perpetrator of some of the most colossal lies of the modern age…. He helped unleash a plague of moral blindness upon the world from which we have still not recovered.”

The Frankfurt School believed there were two types of revolution: (a) Political revolution and (b) Cultural revolution. They were more concerned with cultural revolution, the demolition of the established order from within. “Modern forms of subjection are marked by mildness”, they taught. So-called “reforms” were to be made so slowly and subtly that these changes for the worse were barely perceptible. The School saw the undermining of the social order as a long-term project.

LD:  The systematic erosion of Christian moral values and the promotion of sexual perversion is known as cultural Marxism. Today, thanks to the efforts of organized Jewry which controls 96 percent of the world’s media, cultural Marxism has largely triumphed and Christianity lies in ruins. To many dispassionate observers, society has now reached its rockbottom moral nadir — as Jewish Marxists such as Willi Munzenberg (see quote above) would have been only too happy to witness — had he been around today. 

These iconoclasts kept their sights firmly fixed on the family, education, media, sex and popular culture. Each of these would be their target. If things did not go from bad to worse, year after year, they were not succeeding. To these revolutionary Jewish thinkers, bad was good — and worse was better.

The Destruction of the Family and the Promotion of Feminism

The School’s Critical Theory preached that the “authoritarian personality” was a product of the patriarchal family — an idea directly linked to Engels’ Origins of the Family, Private Property and the State, which promoted matriarchy.

Already Karl Marx had written, in the Communist Manifesto (1848), about the radical notion of a “community of women”. In The German Ideology (1845), he had written disparagingly about the idea of the family as the basic unit of society. This was one of the basic tenets of the Critical Theory: the need to break down the family unit.

LD: All families were essentially evil, these thinkers believed — even happy families — so they had to be destroyed. It was better if children had no parents, or did not know who their parents were. Or if they were orphans of the state. It was better if romantic love between the sexes, leading to stable long-term marriages, were destroyed in favor of short-term, unstable, promiscuous relationships. After all, the former might lead to happiness for all concerned, and that was clearly impermissible — for the whole point of the Cultural Revolution was “to create a culture of pessimism” (Lukács) and “to make life impossible for everyone.” (Münzenberg).

Georg Lukács (1885–1971):
“I want a culture of pessimism … a world abandoned by God”

The Institute scholars therefore preached that “Even a partial breakdown of parental authority in the family might tend to increase the readiness of a coming generation to accept social change.”

LD:  These neo-Freudian Marxist philosophers of the Frankfurt School were clearly out to create trouble: to drive a wedge between parent and child and sow division in the family. Whatever was good in human relationships simply had to be destroyed. If people didn’t have problems, then problems would have to be manufactured “to make life impossible.” (Munzenberg).

All this prepared the way for the warfare against the masculine gender promoted by Marcuse under the guise of “Women’s liberation” and by the New Left movement in the 1960s. They proposed transforming our culture into a female-dominated one.

LD:  The idea that women should run society and wear the trousers, telling men what to do, had an enormous appeal to certain bossy types of women with a surplus of testosterone, particularly to butch lesbians and man-hating matriarchs. Many of these misguided females were to become evangelists for radical  Feminism, some even proposing to cut themselves off from the male sex completely and live in communes of their own. Curiously enough, the number of Jewish feminists is huge—out of all proportion to their percentage in the population.

In 1933, Wilhelm Reich, an honored and adulated member of the Frankfurt School, wrote in The Mass Psychology of Fascism that matriarchy was the only genuine family type of “natural society.” He was, as such, to be an inspiration to the feminists.

LD:  Reich, incidentally, a compulsive masturbator and sexual pervert, had entertained incestuous longings for his own mother and practiced bestiality with horses while still a child. (See here).

This versatile sexual deviant, now a cult figure on the left, along with the equally sex-obsessed Herbert Marcuse—popularizer of the slogan MAKE LOVE, NOT WAR—were to be godfathers of the Sexual Revolution of the 1960s as well as the patron saints of the Feminist movement.

The Indoctrination of Children through Education

Bertrand Russell was to join the Frankfurt School in their efforts at mass social engineering. He spilled the beans in his 1951 book, The Impact of Science on Society. He wrote:

The social psychologists of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. Various results will soon be arrived at. First, that the influence of home is obstructive. Second, that not much can be done unless indoctrination begins before the age of ten. Third, that verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective. Fourth, that the opinion that snow is white must be held to show a morbid taste for eccentricity.

But I anticipate. It is for future scientists to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black, and how much less it would cost to make them believe it is dark gray.

When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen.

LD:  The irony is unmistakable, but that is beside the point. Russell was all for turning the world upside down and ushering in Brave New World: atheism, feminism, and “sexual liberation” i.e., the green light to promiscuity, perversion, and abortion on demand.

The devaluation of values so sought after by the luminaries of the Frankfurt School  has now largely been achieved through sex education and media propaganda: in particular, by the promotion of masturbation, pornography, and the systematic high pressure salesmanship of  homosexuality in schools.   

POSTER ON A “CHRISTIAN” SCHOOL CLASSROOM WALL

LD:  This, then, is the secret agenda of organized Jewry as represented by the Cultural Marxists of the Frankfurt School: the destruction of traditional values, the destruction of the moral order, the destruction of the family unit, the destruction of religion, the destruction of meaning and purpose, and, finally, the destruction of happiness itself.

These are the people who now rule over us. They are in control. They create new wars with the same rapidity that a stage magician pulls rabbits from a hat. And they make sure that the people they rule over, their subject populations, are either demoralized debt slaves in insecure jobs or unemployed bums living on state benefits and a diet of junk food and sleazy junk entertainment laid on by the Jews.

Satan’s Secret Agents have been only too successful in creating a New World Order that bears a remarkable resemblance to hell.